Sour, Laura (2008): Cuáles son los resultados del Presupuesto por Resultados. Published in: Trimestre Fiscal No. 87 (October 2008): pp. 329-357.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50456.pdf Download (9MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The abundance of contemporary literature on the Budget by Results method (BBR) it is a call to researchers to analyze the advantages and limitations of this approach. The first section of this work presents a brief overview of the New Public Administration (NPA), and how the demand for new methodologies like the BBR evolved at the international level. In the second section, based on international evidence, there is a discussion regarding the concept and definition of the BBR. The third section shows that there is not a definitive set of initial conditions that guarantees the successful implementation of the BBR. In the fourth section there is a list of the organizational, political and accounting factors that also influence the implementation of the BBR. The fifth section presents a survey of the perceptions of the public servants involved in the implementation and evaluation of the BBR at the international level. The sixth section presents the main challenges for the successful implementation of the BBR system in the Mexican case. The final section questions both the methodology used to evaluate the implementation of the BBR and, the extent on which the BBR can contribute to evaluate the performance of the public sector.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cuáles son los resultados del Presupuesto por Resultados |
English Title: | What the results of the Budget by Results Have Been |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Budget by Results, Public Policy, Mexico |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H0 - General |
Item ID: | 50456 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Laura Sour |
Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2015 12:32 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 10:45 |
References: | Aguilar, Luis. (2006) Gobernanza y gestión pública. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México. Arellano, David. (2002) Nueva Gestión Pública: ¿El meteorito que mató al dinosaurio? Lecciones para la reforma administrativa en países como México. Documento de trabajo de la División de Administración Pública, número 108. CIDE. México. Arellano Gault, D (2001)Dilemas y potencialidades de los presupuestos orientados a resultados: límites del gerencialismo en la reforma Presupuestal. Documento presentado como ponencia en el VI Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y la Administración Pública. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Andrews, Matthew. (2006) Beyond “Best Practice” and “Basic First” in Adopting Performance Budgeting Reform. World Bank, DC, USA. Public Administration and Development. 26, 147-161. Chan, James L. (2003) Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards. Public Money & Management. (January). 23 (1). 13- 20. Chávez Presa, Jorge A. (2000) Para recobrar la confianza en el gobierno/Hacia la transparencia y mejores resultados con el presupuesto público. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México. Christiaens, Johan, Windels, Paul y Vanslembrouck, Sandrijn. (2004) Accounting and Management Reform in Local Authorities: A Tool for Evaluating Empirically the Outcomes. Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Economie, Bedrijfskunde. Guthrie, James and Tyrone Carlin. (1999) A review of Australian Experiences of Output Based Budgeting: a critical perspective. Presented at the Critical Management Conference, Manchester University, UK. (July). Hepworth, Noel. (2003) Preconditions for Successful Implementation of Accrual Accounting in Central Government. Public Money & Management. (January). 23 (1), 37-44. Hoge, Jeff and Martin, Ed. (2006) Linking Accounting and Budget Data: a Discourse. Public Budgeting and Finance. 26, 2:121 Kettl, Donald F. (2000) The Global Public Management Revolution: a report on the transformation of Governance. The Brookings Institution. Washington, D.C. Klase, Kenneth A. and Michael J. Dougherty. (2004) Establishing a Research Agenda for Empirically Testing the Effects of Performance Budgeting. Paper Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Association of Budgeting and Financial Management (ABFM) of the American Society for Public Administration, Chicago, IL. (October). Klase, Kenneth A., Michael J. Dougherty, AND Soo Geun Song. (1999) The Needs and Financial Problems of Small and Rural Localities: The Case of West Virginia. Public Budgeting & Finance. (Fall) Martí, Caridad. (2006) Accrual budgeting: Accounting Treatment of Key Public Sector Items and Implications for Fiscal Policy. Public Budgeting and Finance. 26, 2:45 Meny, Ives y Thoenig, Jean-Claude. (1992) Las políticas públicas, Ariel, Barcelona. Moynihan, Donald. (2006) Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform. Public Administration Review. (January-February). 77-89. Ngoyi, Mwabilu L., Gerald J. Miller and Marc Holzer. (2004) Outcome Budgeting: Assessment of its Goals and Objectives Across Government Levels. Pina, Vicente and Lourdes Torres. (2003) Reshaping Public Sector Accounting: An International Comparative View. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. (December). Robinson, Marc y Jim Brumby. (2005) “Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature”, IMF Working Paper, Fiscal Affairs Department, WP/05/210. Sanderson, Ian. (2001) Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in “Modern” Local Government. Public Administration. (Summer),79, 2: 297- 313. Schick, Allen. (1999) Oportunity, Strategy, and Tactics in Reforming Public Management. Paper presented at the OECD Symposium, Government of the future: Getting from Here to There, (September) 14-15, Paris. Citado por Donald P. Moynihan en Managing for Results in State Government Evaluating a Decade of Reform. Public Administration Review, January–February 2006. Schick, Allen. (1998) Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms. The World Bank Research Observer.13, 1:123–31. Sevic, Zeljko. (2004) Accounting aspects of NPM: Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector.Journal of finance management In Public Services. Vol. 4, num. 1. Smith, Ken and Rita Cheng. (2004) Assessing Reforms of Government Accounting and Budgeting. Presented at ABFM Conference, Chicago, IL. (November). Scorsone, Eric A. (2005) Looking for Explanations: The Relationship Between Performance Based Budgeting and Government Appropriations. Association for Budgeting and Financial Management Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. Wallace, Sally. (2003) Fiscal Architecture: A Framework for analysis of Public Expenditure Needs and Revenue Capacity. Prepared for the World Bank Thematic Group On Taxation and Tax Policy. (April). Willoughby, Katherine G. and Julia E. Melkers. (2005) Models of Performance- Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting effects. Public Administration Revie. (March/April) 65, 2:180-190. Willoughby, Katherine G. (2004) Performance Measurement and Budget Balance: State Government Perspective. Public Budgeting & Finance. (Summer), 24 (2), 21-39. Willoughby, Katherine G. (2002) Performance Measurement Importance to State Budget Process and Deliberation. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Budgeting and Financial Management of ASPA. (January). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50456 |