Managi, Shunsuke and Hibiki, Akira and Shimane, Tetsuya (2012): Efficiency or Technology Adoption: A Case Study in Waste- Treatment Technology.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50551.pdf Download (882kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Improvements in the effectiveness and efficiency of supply-side waste management are necessary in many countries. In Japan, municipalities with limited budgets have delayed the introduction of new waste-management technologies. Thus, the central government has used subsidies to encourage municipalities to adopt certain new technologies to improve waste-management efficiency. In this study, we measure the efficiency of waste management and explore how technology is related to technical efficiency. We find that municipalities are likely to adopt less-efficient technologies and that the central government's policies are likely to promote inefficient technology adoption by local governments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Efficiency or Technology Adoption: A Case Study in Waste- Treatment Technology |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Waste-Treatment Technology, Waste Management, Efficiency, Productivity, Technology Adoption |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling |
Item ID: | 50551 |
Depositing User: | Shunsuke MANAGI |
Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2013 14:31 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 01:56 |
References: | Arellano, M., and O. Bover, 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68: 29–51. Benito, B., F. Bastida, and J.A. Garcia, 2010. Explaining differences in efficiency: an application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 42(4): 515-528. Blundell, R., and S. Bond, 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143. Callan, S.J. and J.M. Thomas. 2001. Economies of scale and scope: A cost analysis of municipal solid waste services, Land Economics, 77: 548 - 560. Syverson, C. 2011. What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, forthcoming. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang, 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review 84: 66–83. Fullerton, D. and T.C. Kinnaman. 1996. Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag, American Economic Review 86(4): 971-984. Guan, Z., Oude Lansink, A., 2006. The source of productivity growth in Dutch agriculture: A perspective from finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 644–656. Ichinose, D., Yamamoto, M. 2011. On the Relationship Between Provision of Waste Management Service and Illegal Dumping, Resource and Energy Economics, 33 (2011) 79–93. Im, K., M. Pesaran, and Y. Shin, 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53–74. Kinnaman, T.C. editor, 2003. The Economics of Residential Solid Waste Management, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, USA. Kinnaman, T.C. 2006. Examining the justification for residential recycling. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 219-232. Kobe Newspaper. 2007. Rework Cost and Stressing Municipality Budget: Problem of gasification and melting system, 12/25. Kobe Newspaper (http://www.kobep.co.jp/news/shakai/0000781654.shtml accessed on 20/01/2010). Kumar, S. and S. Managi. 2009. Energy Price-induced and exogenous technological change: Assessing the economic and environmental outcomes, Resource and Energy Economics 31 (4) 334–353. Kumar, S. and R.R. Russell. 2002. Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence, The American Economic Review 92: 527–548. Ley, E., M. Macauley and S.W. Salant, 2002. Spatially and intertemporally efficient solid waste management, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(2): 188-218. Managi, S. 2010. Productivity measures and effects from subsidies and trade: an empirical analysis for Japan’s forestry, Applied Economics 42 (30): 3871-3883. Managi, S., J.J. Opaluch, D. Jin, and T.A. Grigalunas. 2004. Technological change and depletion in offshore oil and gas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (2): 388–409. Mazzanti, M. and A. Montini, editor. 2009. Waste and Environmental Policy. Routledge, UK. Ministry of Environment, Japan, 2000. Waste Management and Public Cleansing Act (Law No.5-3), Ministry of Environment, Japan, Tokyo. Ministry of Environment, Japan, 2002. White Paper on the Environment, Ministry of Environment, Japan, Tokyo. Sargan, J.D. 1958. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26: 393-415. Shinkuma, T. and Managi, S. 2011. Waste and Recycling: Theory and Empirics. Routledge, UK. Simar, L. and P.W. Wilson, 2007. Estimation and inference in two–stage, semi–parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics 136: 31–64. Watanabe, T. and T. Hayashi, 2003. Dioxin. Nihon Shincho Publisher, Tokyo (in Japanese). Yamamoto, S. 2004. Society with Burning Waste. [Gomi wo moyasu shakai], Tsukiji-Shokan, Tokyo. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50551 |