John, McGee and Tanya, Sammut-Bonnici (2002): Network Industries in the New Economy. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50623.pdf Download (749kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we discuss two propositions: the supply and demand of knowledge, and network externalities. We outline the characteristics that distinguish knowledge-intensive industries from the general run of manufacturing and service businesses. Knowledge intensity and knowledge specialisation has developed as markets and globalisation have grown, leading to progressive incentives to outsource and for industries to deconstruct. The outcome has been a mixture of more intensive competition laced with points and periods of high differentiation. The paper looks at what is potentially the most powerful economic mechanism: positive feedback, alternatively known as demand-side increasing returns, network effects, or network externalities. This section provides the basis for alternative demand curves that incorporate positive feedback and derives their potential economic and strategic consequences. We argue that the propositions of knowledge supply and demand, and the dynamics of network externalities create new situations for our traditional industrial economy such that new types of economies of scale are emerging and ‘winner takes all’ strategies are having more influence. Our second paper takes the argument further and looks at the nature of firms’ strategies in the new world arguing that attention to technology standards, technical platforms, consumer networks, and supply chain strategies have created a significant contribution to strategy models within the new economy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Network Industries in the New Economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | innovation, innovation diffusion, network effects, network externalities, standards |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 50623 |
Depositing User: | Dr Tanya Sammut-Bonnici |
Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2013 12:56 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 13:00 |
References: | Arthur W. B. (1989), ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events’, Economic Journal 99. 116-131. Arthur W. B. (1990), ‘Positive Feedback in the Economy’ Scientific American, 262, 92-99 Arthur W. B. (1989), ‘Competing technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal, 99, p116-131. Baumol W., Panzar J., Willig R. (1982), ‘Contestable markets and the Theory of Industry’, American Economic Review vol. 72. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W. (1983) 'The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields', American Sociological Review Vol. 48, April (1983) pp. 147-160. Dumont B. (2000), Book Review: Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Journal of Network Industries. Economides, N., (1996), ‘The Economics of Networks,’ International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 675-699. Economides, N., Flyer F. (1997), ‘Compatibility and Market Structure for Network Goods,’ Discussion Paper EC-98-02, Stern School of Business, N.Y.U. Evans, Philip, and Thomas S. Wurster (2000). Blown to Bits. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press Hawley A. (1968) ‘Human Ecology’, in Sills, D.L. (ed.) International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan, 1968, pp.328-337 Katz M., Shapiro C. (1985), ‘Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,’ American Economic Review, vol. 75 (3), pp. 424-440. Kelly K, Out of Control - The New Biology of Machines (1994 Addison Wesley). Liebowitz S., Margolis S. (1999), Winners, Losers & Microsoft : Competition and Antitrust in High Technology, Oakland, The Independent Institute. Quinn J.B., (2001), Services and Technology, Revolutionizing Economics, Business and Education. Darmond College Saloner G., Shepard A., Podolny J. (2001), Strategic Management, Wiley, New York. Shapiro C., Varian H. (1999), ‘Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy’, Harvard Business School Press, p. 2. Sharkey N.E., Sharkey A.J.C. (1993) Adaptive Generalisation and the Transfer of Knowledge Artificial Intelligence Review: Special Issue on Connectionism, 7, 313-328. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50623 |