Synergies or overpayment in European corporate M&A

Díaz Díaz, Belén and Sanfilippo Azofra, Sergio and López Gutiérrez, Carlos (2013): Synergies or overpayment in European corporate M&A. Published in: Journal of contemporary issues in business research , Vol. 2, No. 5 (2013): pp. 135-153.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test whether the price paid for corporate takeovers in Europe is related to the synergies expected or whether bidders are overpaying for acquisitions. We analyzed the relationship between the premium paid in 147 mergers and acquisitions, and the bidders’ abnormal returns around the date of the transaction from 1995 to 2004. A quadratic relationship between the premiums and returns was found. When the amount paid in a transaction does not exceed the value of the target organization by more than 39.69–40.03%, the premium becomes a sign of the future synergy and will have a positive effect on the bidders’ returns. However, when the premium exceeds these values, the relationship between premiums and returns become negative and therefore the market considers bidders are overpaying. This paper show the importance of the correct valuation of the targets and of the premiums paid to ensure value creation in M&A.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Corporate takeovers; premium; overpayment hypothesis; synergy hypothesis
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance

References

Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. and Mandelker, G. (1992). The post-merger performance of acquiring firms, A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance, 47 (4), 1605–1621.

Akhigbe, A., Martin, A. D., & Whyte, A. M. (2007). Partial acquisitions, the acquisition probability hypothesis, and the abnormal returns to partial targets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(10), 3080-3101.

Antoniou, A., Arbour, P. and Zhao, H. (2008). How much is too much, are merger premiums too high?. European Financial Management, 14 (2), 268–287.

Becher, D. A. (2004). The valuation effects of bank mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 189–214.

Beitel, P., Schiereck. D. and Wahrenburg, M. (2004). Explaining M&A success in European banks. European Financial Management, 10 (1), 109–139.

Berger, P.G. and Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37 (1), 39–65.

Berkovitch, E. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers, An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (3), 347–362.

Bharadwaj, A. and Shivdasani, A. (2003). Valuation effects of bank financing in acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 113–148.

Bradley, M., Desai, A. and Kim, E. H. (1983). The rational behind interfirm tender offers,Information of synergy?. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 183–206.

Brewer, E., Jackson, W. E. and Jagtiani, J. A. (2000). Impact of Independent directors and the regulatory environment on bank merger prices, evidence form takeover activity in the 1990s. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago WP 2000-31.

Bris, A. (2002). Toeholds, takeover premium, and the probability of being acquired. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(3), 227-253.

Brown, D. T. and Ryngaert, M. D. (1991). The mode of acquisition in takeovers, taxes and asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, 46 (2), 653–669.

Bruner, R. F. (2004). Applied mergers and acquisitions. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.

Campa, J.M. and Hernando, I., 2004. Shareholder value creation in European M&As. European Financial Management, 10 (1), 47–81.

Campa, J. M. and Kedia, S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance, 57, 1731–1762.

Chen, S., Ho, K. W., Lee, C. and Shrestha, K. (2004). Nonlinear Models in Corporate Finance Research, Review, Critique, and Extensions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22, 141-169.

Cheng, L. T. and Lung, T. Y. (2004). A comparative analysis of the market-based and accounting-based performance of diversifying and non-diversifying acquisitions in Hong Kong. International Business Review, 13, 763–789.

Conklin, D. W. (2005). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions, a response to environmental transformation. Journal of World Business, 40 (1), 29–40.

Datta, D. K., Pinches, G. E. and Narayanan, V. K. (1992). Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions, A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (1), 67–84.

DeLong, G. L. (2001). Stockholder gains from focusing versus diversifying bank mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 221–252.

Desai, A., Kroll, M. and Wright, P. (2005). Outside board monitoring and the economic outcomes of acquisitions, a test of the substitution hypothesis. Journal of Business Research, 58, 926–934.

Díaz, B., García, M. and Sanfilippo, S. (2004). Bank acquisitions and performance, evidence from a panel of European credit entities. Journal of Economics and Business, 56 (5), 377–404.

Díaz, B., Sanfilippo, S. and López, C. (2009). Are M&A Premiums too high? Analysis of a quadratic relationship between premiums and returns. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48 (3), 3-22.

Dodd, P. and Warner, J. (1983). On corporate governance, a study of proxy contest. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 401–438.

Draper, P. and Paudyal, K. (2008). Information Asymmetry and Bidders' Gains. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35 (3/4), 376–405.

Eckbo, E. and Thorburn, K. (2000). Gains to bidder firms revisited, Domestic and foreign acquisitions in Canada. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (1), 1– 25.

Eckbo, E. (2009). Bidding strategies and takeover premiums, A review. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, 149-178.

Fishman, M. J. (1989). ‘Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions’, Journal of Finance, 44 (1), 41–57.

Flanagan, D. J. and O’Shaughnessy, K. C. (2003). Core-related acquisitions, multiple bidders and tender offer premiums. Journal of Business Research, 56, 573–585.

Goergen, M. and Renneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European Financial Management, 10 (1), 9–45.

Greenfield, L. (1997). Bidders still have deep pockets despite the recession. Acquisitions Monthly 1992, 8.

Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of U.K. acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24 (7/8), 971–1002.

Grullon, G., Michaely, R. and Swary, I. (1997). Capital adequacy, bank mergers, and the medium of payment. Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 24 (1), 97–124.

Gupta, A. and Misra L. (2007). Deal Size, Bid Premium, and Gains in Bank Mergers, The Impact of Managerial Motivations. The Financial Review, 42, 373–400.

Hansen, R. G. (1987). A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business, 60, 75–95.

Hayward, M. L. A. and Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premium paid for large acquisitions, Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1),103–127.

Healy, P., Palepu, K. and Ruback, R. (1997). Which takeovers are profitable, strategic of financial?. Sloan Management Review, 38 (4), 45–57.

Houston, J. F. and Ryngaert, M. D. (1997). Equity issuance and adverse selection, a direct test using conditional stock offers. Journal of Finance, 52, 197–219.

Houston, J. F., James, C. M. and Ryngaert, M.D. (2001). Where do merger gains come from? Bank mergers from the perspective of insiders and outsiders. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 285–331.

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76 (2), 71–92.

Kohers, N. and Kohers, T. (2000). The value creation potential of high-tech mergers. Financial Analysts Journal, 56 (3), 40–50.

Krug, J. A. and Nigh, D. (2001). Executive perceptions in foreign and domestic acquisitions, An analysis of foreign ownership and its effect on executive fate. Journal of World Business, 36 (1), 85–105.

Loree, D., Chen, C. and Guisinger, S. (2000). International acquisitions, Do financial analysts take note?. Journal of World Business, 35 (3), 300–313.

Loughran, T. and Vijh, A. (1997). Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions?. Journal of Finance, 52 (5), 1765–1790.

Louis, H. (2004). The cost of using bank mergers as defensive mechanisms against takeover threats. Journal of Business, 77, 295–310.

Maquieira, C., Megginson, W. and Nail, L. (1998). Wealth creation versus wealth redistributions in pure stock-for-stock Mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 3–33.

Martinova, M. y Renneboog, L. (2011). The Performance of the European Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from the Fifth Takeover Wave. European Financial Management, 17 (2), 208-259.

Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F.P. and Stulz, R.M. (2005). Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. Journal of Finance, 60 (2), 757–782.

Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1990). Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions?. Journal of Finance, 45 (1), 31–48.

Mueller, D. C. and Sirower, M. L. (2003). The causes of mergers, Tests based on the gains to acquiring firms shareholders and the size of premia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 373–391.

Paliwal, R. (2007). Takeovers and Agency Problems, A Reexamination of the Pre-Acquisition Operating Performance of Targets. The Business Review, 8 (2), 29–37.

Paul, D. L. (2007). Board Composition and Corrective Action, Evidence from Corporate Responses to Bad Acquisition Bids. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,42 (3), 759–783.

Porrini, P. (2006). Are investment bankers good for acquisition premiums?. Journal of Business Research, 59, 90–99.

Rhoades, S. A. (1994). A summary of mergers performance studies in banking, 1980–93,and an assessment of the operating performance and event study methodologies.

Staff Studies, 1990–99/ss169, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59,197–216.

Ruback, R. (1982). The Conoco takeover and stockholder returns. Sloan Management Review, 23, 13–33.

Schwert, G. W. (2000). Hostility in takeovers, In the eyes of the beholder? Journal of Finance, 55 (6), 2599–2640.

Schwert, G. W. (2003). Anomalies and market efficiency. In, Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R , eds.., Handbook of the economics of finance. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, W. R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52 (2), 737–783.

Sirower, M. L. (1997). The synergy trap, How companies lose the acquisition game. The Free Press, New York.

Slangen, A. H. L. (2006). National cultural distance and initial foreign acquisition performance, The moderating effect of integration. Journal of World Business, 41(2), 161–170.

Slusky, A. R. and Caves, R. E. (1991). Synergy, agency and the determinants of premia paid in mergers. Journal of Industrial Economics, 39, 277–296.

Sudarsanam, S. and Mahate, A.A. (2003). Glamour acquirers, method of payment and postacquisition performance, The UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30, 299–341.

Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firms’stock returns. Journal of Finance, 42, 943–963.

Varaiya, N. P. and Ferris, K. R. (1987). Overpaying in corporate takeovers, The winner’s curse. Financial Analysts Journal, 43 (3), 64–70.

Walters, B. A., Mark, J., Kroll, M. J. and Wright, P. (2007). CEO tenure, boards of directors, and acquisition performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 331–338.

Whited, T. (2001). Is it inefficient investment that causes the diversification discount?.Journal of Finance, 56, 1667–1691.