Kiselev, Eugene (2013): Lobbying, Corruption, and Regulatory Constraints: An Analysis of Eastern European Business Associations.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51936.pdf Download (428kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines lobbying and corruption as alternative ways of dealing with regulatory obstacles. I propose a model where firms facing a costly regulation can bribe a rule-enforcing bureaucrat to get around it, lobby the government to reduce its impact, or do both. I then use a firm-level dataset of Eastern European enterprises to examine whether firms use membership in a lobby group as a substitute for the bribe payments they make to rule-enforcing bureaucrats. The results indicate that firms who join lobby groups do not stop paying bribes to bureaucrats, and firms more impacted by corruption are no more likely to join a lobby group than their counterparts. On the other hand joining a lobby group increases the likelihood of a firm bribing legislators and other rule makers, suggesting that lobbying introduces the possibility of state capture by allowing firms access to policy makers that they wouldn't otherwise have.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Lobbying, Corruption, and Regulatory Constraints: An Analysis of Eastern European Business Associations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Lobbying, Corruption, Regulations |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation |
Item ID: | 51936 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Eugene Kiselev |
Date Deposited: | 08 Dec 2013 07:15 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 20:16 |
References: | [1] D. Austen-Smith. Interest groups: Money, information and influence. Perspectives on public choice: A Handbook, page 2960321, 1997. [2] B. Begovic. Corruption, lobbying and state capture. CLDS Working Paper, 2005. [3] M. Bennedsen, S. Feldmann, and D. Lassen. Lobbying and bribes-a survey-based analysis of the demand for influence and corruption. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3496, 2011. [4] M. Bennedsen and S.E. Feldmann. Informational lobbying and political contributions. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4):631–656, 2006. [5] N.F. Campos and F. Giovannoni. Lobbying, corruption and political influence. Public Choice, 131(1):1–21, 2007. [6] N.F. Campos and F. Giovannoni. Lobbying, corruption and other banes. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 930, 2008. [7] S. Coate and S. Morris. Policy persistence. The American economic review, 89(5):1327–1336, 1999. [8] R. Damania and E. Yalc`yn. Corruption and political competition. Economics Discussion Papers, 2008. [9] R.F. Doner and B.R. Schneider. Business associations and economic development: why some associations contribute more than others. Business and Politics, 2(3):261– 288, 2000. [10] D. Duvanova. Business associations in post-communist russia: Explaining sectoral variation. In Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, 2006. [11] G.M. Grossman and E. Helpman. Protection for sale. American economic review, 84(4):833–850, 1994. [12] G.M. Grossman and E. Helpman. Special interest politics. The MIT Press, 2002. [13] B. Harstad and J. Svensson. Bribes, lobbying, and development. American Political Science Review, 105(01):46–63, 2011. [14] C. Holman and W. Luneburg. Lobbying and transparency: A comparative analysis of regulatory reform. Interest groups & Advocacy, 1(1):75–104, 2012. [15] V. Kalnins. Transparency in Lobbying: Comparative Review of Existing and Emerging Regulatory Regimes. Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS, 2011. [16] W. Lehmann and L. Bosche. Lobbying in the European Union: Current rules and practices. European Parliament Luxembourg, 2003. [17] M. Olson. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, volume 124. Harvard Univ Pr, 1965. [18] M. Olson. The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale Univ Pr, 1982. [19] W. Pyle. Contractual disputes and the channels for interfirm communication. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21(2):547–575, 2005. [20] W. Pyle. Collective action and post-communist enterprise: The economic logic of russia’s business associations. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(4):491–521, 2006. [21] G. Sukiassyan and J.B. Nugent. Lobbying or information provision. Eastern European Economics, 49(2):30–63, 2011. [22] J.D. Sullivan, K.E. Bettcher, and A. Shkolnikov. Business associations, business climate, and economic growth: evidence from transition economies. In annual conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Boulder, Colorado, 2006. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51936 |