Liddle, Brantley (2009): Long-Run Relationship among Transport Demand, Income, and Gasoline Price for the US. Published in: Transportation Research D: Transport and Environment , Vol. 14, (2009): pp. 73-82.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_52080.pdf Download (170kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Energy used in transport is a particularly important focus for environment-development studies because it is increasing in both developed and developing countries and is largely carbon-intensive. This paper examines whether a systemic, mutually causal, cointegrated relationship exists among mobility demand, gasoline price, income, and vehicle ownership using US data from 1946 to 2006. We find that those variables co-evolve in a transport system; and thus, they cannot be easily disentangled in the short-run. However, estimating a long-run relationship for motor fuel use per capita was difficult because of the efficacy of the CAFE standards to influence fleet fuel economy. The analysis shows that the fuel standards program was effective in improving the fuel economy of the US vehicle fleet and in temporarily lessening the impact on fuel use of increased mobility demand. Among the policy implications are a role for efficiency standards, a limited impact for fuel tax, and the necessity of using a number of levers simultaneously to influence transport systems.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Long-Run Relationship among Transport Demand, Income, and Gasoline Price for the US |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Transport demand; Energy consumption and development; Cointegration; Granger-causality; CAFE program |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q41 - Demand and Supply ; Prices R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion ; Travel Time ; Safety and Accidents ; Transportation Noise |
Item ID: | 52080 |
Depositing User: | Dr Brantley Liddle |
Date Deposited: | 10 Dec 2013 20:33 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:26 |
References: | Akarca, A.T. and Long, T.V., 1980. On the relationship between energy and GNP: reexamination. Journal of Energy and Development 5, 326-331. Akinboade, O., Ziramba, E., and Kumo, W., 2008. The demand for gasoline in South Africa: An empirical analysis using cointegration techniques. Energy Economics, in press. Alves, D. and De Losso da Silveria Bueno, R., 2003. Short-run, long-run and cross elasticities of gasoline demand in Brazil. Energy Economics 25, 191-199. American Automobile Association (Various years). Your Driving Costs, Heathrow, FL. Ben-David, D., Lumsdaine, R., and Papell, D., 2003. Unit roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: Evidence for two structural breaks. Empirical Economics 28, 303-319. Bentzen, J., 1994. An empirical analysis of gasoline demand in Denmark using cointegration techniques. Energy Economics 16 (2), 139-143. Dahl, C. and Sterner, T., 1991. Analyzing Gasoline Demand Elasticities: A Survey. Energy Economics 3(13), 203-210. Davis, S.C., 1997. Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 17, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. De Vita, G., Endresen, K., and Hunt, L.C., 2006. An empirical analysis of energy demand in Namibia. Energy Policy 34, 3447-3463. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J., and Stock, J.H., 1996. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813-836. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55 (2), 251-276. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., and Chen, D., 2007. Growing Cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC. Graham, D. and Glaister, S., 2002. The demand for automobile fuel: A survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36(1), 1-26. Granger, C., 1980. Forecasting in Business and Economics, Academic Press, New York. Hall, A., 1994. Testing for a unit root in time series with pretest data-based model selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, 461-470. Hughes, J., Knittel, C., and Daniel, S., 2008. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. The Energy Journal 29(1), 113-134. Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254. Johnston, L. D. and Williamson, S.H., 2008. What Was the U.S. GDP Then?, Measuring Worth. http://www.measuringworth.org/usgdp/# Kraft, J. and Kraft, A., 1978. On the relationship between energy and GDP. Journal of Energy and Development 3, 401-403. Liddle, B., 2004. Demographic dynamics and per capita environmental impact: Using panel regressions and household decompositions to examine population and transport. Population and Environment 26(1), 23-39. Liddle, B., 2006. How Linked are Energy and GDP: Reconsidering Energy-GDP Cointegration and Causality for Disaggregated OECD Country Data. International Journal of Energy, Environment and Economics 13 (2), 97-113. Maddala, G.S. and Kim, I., 2000. Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Murrell, J.D., Hellman, K.H., and Heavenrich, R.M., 1993. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends Through 1993, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, Ann Arbor, Michigan. National Research Council, 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards, National Academy Press. Polemis, M., 2006. Empirical assessment of the determinants of road energy demand in Greece. Energy Economics 28, 385-403. Polzin, S. and Chu, X., 2005. A closer look at public transportation mode share trends. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 8(3), 41-53. Stern, D.I., 1993. Energy use and economic growth in the USA, a multivariate approach. Energy Economics 15, 137-150. Stern, D.I., 2000. A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics 22, 267-283. Yu, E.S.H. and Hwang, B.K., 1984. The relationship between energy and GNP: further results. Energy Economics 6, 186-190. Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K., 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 251-70. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52080 |