Cason, Timothy and Sheremeta, Roman and Zhang, Jingjing (2012): Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games. Published in: Games and Economic Behavior
PDF
MPRA_paper_52107.pdf Download (785kB) |
Abstract
Costless pre-play communication has been found to effectively facilitate coordination and enhance efficiency in games with Pareto-ranked equilibria. We report an experiment in which two groups compete in a weakest-link contest by expending costly efforts. Allowing intra-group communication leads to more aggressive competition and greater coordination than control treatments without any communication. On the other hand, allowing inter-group communication leads to less destructive competition. As a result, intra-group communication decreases while inter-group communication increases payoffs. Our experiment thus provides an example of an environment where communication can either enhance or damage efficiency. This contrasts sharply with experimental findings from public goods and other coordination games, where communication always enhances efficiency and often leads to socially optimal outcomes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | contest, between-group competition, within-group competition, cooperation, coordination, free-riding, experiments |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 52107 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 10 Dec 2013 21:38 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 01:30 |
References: | Abbink. K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2010). Inter-Group Conflict and Intra-Group Punishment in an Experimental Contest Game. American Economic Review, 100, 420-447. Akerlof, G. & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 715-53. Akerlof, G. & Kranton, R. E. (2005). Identity and the Economics of Organizations. Journal of Economic Perspective, 19 (1), 9-32. Baik, K.H., Kim, I.G., and Na, S. (2001). Bidding for a Group-Specific Public-Good Prize. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 415-429. Baye, M.R., & Hoppe H.C. (2003). The Strategic Equivalence of Rent-Seeking, Innovation, and Patent-Race Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 44, 217-226. Baye, M.R., de Vries, C.G. & Kovenock, D. (1996). The all-pay auction with complete information. Economic Theory, 8, 291-305. Bernheim, B.D., B, Peleg, & M.D., Whinston, (1987). Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 1-12. Bevolo, C. (2011) Joe Public Doesn't Care About Your Hospital, RockBench Publishing. Bicchieri, C. (2002). Covenants Without Swords: Group Identity, Norms, and Communication in Social Dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 14(2), 192-228. Blume, A., & Ortmann, A. (2007). The effects of costless pre-play communication: Experimental evidence from games with Pareto-ranked equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 274-290. Bornstein, G. (1992). The Free Rider Problem in Intergroup Conflicts over Step-level and Continuous Public Goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 597-606. Bornstein, G., Gneezy, U., & Nagel, R. (2002). The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 41, 1–25. Bornstein, G., Rapoport, A., Kerpel, L. & Katz, T. (1989). Within- and Between-Group Communication in Intergroup Competition for Public Goods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 422-436. Brandts, J., & Cooper, D. J. (2006). Observability and overcoming coordination failure in organizations. Experimental Economics, 9, 407–423. Cachon, G.P., & Camerer, C.F. (1996). Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 165–194 Camerer, C. F., & Knez, M. (1994). Creating 'Expectational Assets' in the Laboratory: 'Weakest-link' Coordination Games. Strategic Management Journal, 15,101-19. Camerer, C.F., Knez, M., & Weber, R.A. (2004). Timing and Virtual Observability in Ultimatum Bargaining and Weak Link Coordination Games. Experimental Economics, 7, 25–48. Cason, T.N., Masters, W.A. & Sheremeta, R.M. (2010). Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 604-611. Cason, T.N., Savikhin, A., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Behavioral Spillovers in Coordination Games. European Economic Review, 56, 233-245. Charness, G. (2000). Self-Serving Cheap Talk: A Test Of Aumann's Conjecture. Games and Economic Behavior, 33, 177-194. Charness, G., & Grosskopf, B. (2004). What makes cheap talk effective? Experimental evidence. Economics Letters, 83, 383-389. Charness, G., Rigotti, L. & Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual Behavior and Group Membership. American Economic Review, 97, 1340-1352. Chaudhuri, A., Schotter, A., & Sopher, B. (2009). Talking Ourselves to Efficiency: Coordination in Inter-Generational Minimum Effort Games with Private, Almost Common and Common Knowledge of Advice. Economic Journal, 119(534), 91-122. Chen, Y. & Li, X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99 (1), 431-457. Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Top Guns May Not Fire: Best-Shot Group Contests with Group-Specific Public Good Prizes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Clark, D.J., & Konrad, K.A. (2007). Asymmetric Conflict: Weakest Link against Best Shot. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 457-469. Clark, K., & Sefton, M. (2001). Repetition and signalling: Experimental evidence from games with efficient equilibria. Economics Letters, 70, 357–362. Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37-46. Cooper, D.J., & Kagel, J.H., (2005). Are Two Heads Better than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. American Economic Review, 95, 477–509. Cooper, D.J., & Kühn, K.U. (2010) Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion, Working Paper, Florida State University. Cooper, R., De Jong, D., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. (1989). Communication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental results. RAND Journal of Economics, 20, 568-587. Cooper, R., De Jong, D., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. (1990). Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. American Economic Review, 80, 218–233. Cooper, R., De Jong, D., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. (1992). Communication in coordination games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 739–771. Davis, D.D., & Holt, C.A. (1998). Conspiracies and secret price discounts in laboratory markets. Economic Journal, 108, 736-756. Devetag, G., & Ortmann, A. (2007). When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 10, 331-344. Duffy, J., & Feltovich, N. (2002). Do actions speak louder than words? Observation vs. cheap talk as coordination devices. Games and Economic Behavior, 39, 1–27. Duffy, J., & Feltovich, N. (2006). Words, deeds and lies: Strategic behavior in games with multiple signals. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 669–688. Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58 (3), 371-392. Engel, C. (2007). How much Collusion? A Meta-Analysis of Oligopoly Experiments. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 3, 491-549. Feri, F., Irlenbusch, B. & Sutter, M. (2010). Efficiency Gains from Team-Based Coordination – Large-Scale Experimental Evidence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1892-1912. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. Harbring, C. (2006). The Effect of Communication in Incentive Systems—An Experimental Study. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 333-353. Henning-Schmidt, H., Li, Z.-Y. & Yang, C. (2008) Why People Reject Advantageous Offers—Non-Monotonic Strategies in Ultimatum Bargaining: Evaluating a Video Experiment Run in PR China. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 373-384. Hirshleifer, J. (1983). From Weakest Link to Best-Shot: The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods. Public Choice, 41, 371–386. Holt, C.A., & Laury, S.K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644-1655. Isaac, R.M., Ramey, V. & Williams, A. (1984). The Effects of Market Organization on Conspiracies in Restraint of Trade. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 191-222. Isaac, R.M., & Walker, J.M. (1988). Communication and Free-Riding Behavior: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism. Economic Inquiry, 26, 585-608. Kelly, R. (2009). Where Can $700 Billion in Waste be Cut Annually from the U.S. Healthcare System? White Paper, Healthcare Analytics, Thomson Reuters. Knez, M., & Camerer, F. C. (2000). Increasing Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemmas by Establishing a Precedent of Efficiency in Coordination Games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 194-216. Kocher, M. & Sutter, M. (2005). The Decision Maker Matters: Individual versus Group Behavior in Experimental Beauty-contest Games. Economic Journal, 115, 200–223. Konrad, K.A. (2009). Strategy and Dynamics in Contests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. Landis, J.R. & Koch, G. (1977). An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-Type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreeement among Multiple Observers, Biometrics, 33. 363-374. Lee, D. (2012). Weakest-link contest with group-specific public good prizes. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 238-248. Ledyard, J.O. (1995). Public Goods; A Survey of Experimental Research. In Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (editors), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. McLeish, K. N. & Oxoby, R. J. (2007). Identity, Cooperation and Punishment. IZA Discussion paper 2572, Institute for the Study of Labor. Millner, E.L., & Pratt, M.D. (1989). An experimental investigation of efficient rent-seeking. Public Choice, 62, 139–151. Münster, J. (2009). Group Contest Success Functions. Economic Theory, 41, 345--357. Nalbantian, H., & Schotter, A. (1997). Productivity Under Group Incentives: An Experimental Study. American Economic Review, 87, 314-341. Riechmann, T., & Weimann J. (2008). Competition as a Coordination Device: Experimental Evidence from a Minimum Effort Coordination Game. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 437-454. Selten, R., & Stoecker, R. (1986). End behavior in sequences of finite Prisoner's Dilemma supergames A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7, 47-70. Sheremeta, R.M. (2010). Multi-Stage Elimination Contests: An Experimental Investigation. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 731-747. Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Perfect-Substitutes, Best-Shot, and Weakest-Link Contests between Groups. Korean Economic Review, 27, 5-32. Sutter, M. (2009). Individual Behavior and Group Membership: Comment. American Economic Review, 99 (5), 2247-2257 Sutter, M., & Strassmair, C. (2009). Communication, cooperation and collusion in team tournaments - An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 66, 506-525. Szidarovszky, F., & Okuguchi, K. (1997). On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-Seeking games. Games and Economic Behavior 18, 135-140. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In Stephen Worchel and William Austin, eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient Rent Seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tullock, (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112. Van Huyck, J. B., Battalio, R. C., & Beil, R. O. (1990). Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. American Economic Review, 80, 234–248. Van Huyck, J. B., Battalio, R. C., & Beil, R. O. (1991). Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 885–911. Van Huyck, J. B., Battalio, R. C., & Beil, R. O. (1993). Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: Coordination failure, game form auctions, and tacit communication. Games and Economic Behavior, 5, 485–504. Weber, R. (2006). Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. American Economic Review, 96(1), 114–126. Zhang, J. (2009). Communication in Asymmetric Group Competition over Public Goods. McMaster University, Working Paper. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52107 |