Kasai, Katsuya (2011): A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects. Published in: Journal of Environmental Information Science , Vol. 40(5), (March 2012): pp. 1-10.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_52160.pdf Download (163kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The CDM seems to play a significant role in international GHG reduction activities. Yet, a few emerging countries have hosted majority of CDM projects whereas most LDCs have not hosted CDM projects at all. Given the current distributional imbalance, this study aims to identify determinants of CDM project hosting based on an empirical analysis using the tobit model. On the basis of the literature review, this study focuses on two factors, namely the host countries’ qualities of business environment and scientific level. As a result, this study finds the significance of business environment for both bilateral and unilateral CDM projects. Likewise, the significance of scientific and technical level is confirmed especially for unilateral CDM projects. Finally, this article suggests that eligible host countries should focus exclusively on the improvement of controllable determinants such as business environment to attract CDM investors. In addition, it is likely to be better for eligible host countries with low GHG emissions to develop CDM projects unilaterally using programmatic CDM due to their lower economic attractiveness.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects |
English Title: | A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | CDM, Kyoto Protocol, unequal distribution, business environment, tobit model |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 52160 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Katsuya Kasai |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2013 12:32 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 05:26 |
References: | Amemiya, T. (1984) Tobit models: A survey, Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3-61. Boyd, E., Hultman, N., Roberts, T., Corbera, E., Cole, J., Bozmoski, A., Ebeling, E., Tippman, R., Mann, P., Brown, K. and Liverman, D. (2009) Reforming the CDM for Sustainable Development: Lessons Learned and Policy Futures. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.12, No.7, 820~831. Dinar, A., Rahman, S., Larson, D. and Ambrosi, P. (2008) Factors affecting levels of international cooperation in carbon abatement projects. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4786. Flamos, A. (2010) The Clean Development Mechanism - Catalyst for Wide Spread Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies? or Misnomer? Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol.12, No.1, 89~102. Flues, F. (2010) Who Hosts the Clean Development Mechanism? Determinants of CDM Project Distribution. CIS Working Paper 53. Haites, E. (2004) Estimating the market potential for the CDM: review of models and lessons learned. The International Energy Agency and the International Emissions Trading Association, Washington DC, 71pp. Huang, Y. and Barker, T. (2008) The Clean Development Mechanism and Sustainable Development: A Panel Data Analysis. Working Paper, University of Cambridge 39. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) (2010) Towards CDM reform. IGES, Kanagawa, 33pp. Jahn, M., Michaelowa, A., Raubenheimer, S. and Liptow, H. (2004) Measuring the potential of unilateral CDM - a pilot study. HWWA Discussion Paper 263. Jung, M. (2006) Host county attractiveness for CDM non-sink projects. Energy Policy, Vol.34, 2173~2184. Michaelowa, A. (2007) Unilateral CDM - can developing countries finance generation of greenhouse gas emission credits on their own? International Environmental Agreements, Vol.7, No.18, 17~34. Muller, A. (2007) How to Make the Clean Development Mechanism Sustainable - The Potential of Rent Extraction. Energy Policy, Vol.35, No.6, 3203~3212. Niederberger, A. and Saner, R. (2005) Exploring the relationships between FDI flows and CDM potential. Transnational Corporations, Vol.14, No.1, 1~40. Paulsson, E. (2009) A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny? International Environ Agreements, Vol.9, 63~80. Sutter, C. and Parreño, J. (2007) Does the Current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Deliver its Sustainable Development Claim? An Analysis of Officially Registered CDM Projects. Climate Change, Vol.84, No.1, 75~90. Tobin, J. (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24~36. UNEP Risø Centre. (2008) A reformed CDM – including new Mechanisms for Sustainable Development. Roskilde, UNEP Risø Centre, 183pp. Wang, H. and Firestone, J. (2010) The analysis of country-to-country CDM permit trading using the gravity model in international trade. Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol.14, No.1, 6~13. Winkelman, A. and Moore, M. (2011) Explaining the differential distribution of Clean Development Mechanism projects across host countries. Energy Policy, Vol.39, No.3, 1132~1143. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52160 |
Available Versions of this Item
- A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects. (deposited 12 Dec 2013 12:32) [Currently Displayed]