Hierarchy of Agricultural Functions: A Study of Production and Marketed Output in Purnia (North Bihar, India)

Mahmood Ansari, Mahmood Ansari (2010): Hierarchy of Agricultural Functions: A Study of Production and Marketed Output in Purnia (North Bihar, India). Published in: Komol Singha (Edited), Rural Development in India (2010): pp. 276-306.

Abstract

There may be a situation for classes of peasantry whereby a peasant-cultivator of a specific class location may not even make both ends meet. A peasant may be in debt. It may not be the net returns for a peasant of this class but the gross yield, which he/she may be seeking to maximize with the burden of debt allowed to be accumulating. In such circumstances, it is clearly futile to reduce all operators to the status of the profit maximizers. It is worth arguing that there cannot logically and realistically be a uniform technology adopted by the peasantry, who are differentiated on the basis of inequality in the resource endowments and land ownership base. In such a circumstance, the minimization of deviations from the average relation between inputs and output characterizing the least-square method of regression analysis to derive a production function is anti-thesis of the differentiation of peasantry. All the operators are not to be assumed to be uniformly profit-maximizers and a uniform technology may not posited to be accessible to all classes of peasantry. It is therefore posited that there are bound to be logically a hierarchy of production functions rather than a unique aggregate function in the agriculture. A unique production function is best suitable for a cross-section of uniformly controlled experimental farms, but not the diverse class of actual farms possessed by differentiated peasantry. What is true of an agricultural production function is equally true of a marketed surplus function. What must not be debatable is the assertion that there is logically a possibility of a hierarchy of marketed surplus functions on the divergent peasant farms of the differentiated peasantry in the district of Purnia in north Bihar, India.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: peasantry, price, labour, output, yield, acreage, regression coefficient, statistical test production function, marketed surplus function, class differentiation, rich peasant, small peasant, middle peasant, district
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

References

Acharya, S. S. (1988), Agricultural Production, Marketing and Price Policy in India, Mittal Publication, New Delhi

Anderson, J. R. and N. S. Jodha (1973), “On Cobb-Douglas Production Function and Related Myths”, Economic and Political Weekly (Reviews of Agriculture), June

Bharadwaj, Krishna (1985), “A Note on Commercialization in Agriculture” in Raj, K. N., N. Bhattacharya, S. Guha and S. Padhi (1985) (Eds.), Essays on the Commercialization of Indian Agriculture, Oxford University Press, Delhi

Kritsman, L. N. (1984), “Class Stratification of the Soviet Countryside”, in Terry Cox and Garry Littlejohn (1984) (Eds.), Kritsman and the Agrarian Marxists, Frank Cass, London

Leonard, W.H. and J.H. Martin (1963), Cereal Crops, Macmillan, New York

Lewis-Beck, Michael (1980), Applied Regression: An Introduction, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, London

Mitra, Manoshi (1985), Agrarian Social Structure: Continuity and Change in Bihar, 1786-1820, Manohar Publishers, New Delhi

Patnaik, Utsa (1975), “Output and Marketable Surplus of Agricultural Products: Contribution by Cultivating Groups in India, 1960-61”, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 10, no. 52

Patnaik, Utsa (1987), Peasant Class Differentiation: A Study in Method with Reference to Haryana, Oxford University Press, Delhi

Rahman, Atiur (1986), Peasants and Classes: A Study of Differentiation in Bangladesh, Oxford University Press, New Delhi

Raj Krishna (1962), “A Note on the Elasticity of the Marketable Surplus of a Subsistence Crop”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.18, no.3

Roy Chaudhury, P. C. (1963), Bihar District Gazetteer: Purnea, Government of Bihar, Patna

Sarkar, G. K. (1989), Jute in India: An Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, Calcutta

Shanin, Teodor (1972), The Awkward Class: Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society, Russia 1910-25, Oxford University Press, London

Soloman, S. G. (1977), The Soviet Agrarian Debate: A Controversy in Social Science, 1923-1929, West View Press, Boulder, Colorado

Thorner, Daniel, et al. (1966), A. V. Chayanov: On the Theory of Peasant Economy, Richard Irwin Inc., Homewood

Wolf, Eric (1966), Peasants, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Wolf, Eric (1969), Peasant Wars of Twentieth Century, Harper and Row, New York

Zedong, Mao (1926), "How to Differentiate the Classes in the Rural Areas?” in Zedong, Mao (1967), Selected Works, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Beijing

Zedong, Mao (1933), “An Analysis of the Classes in Chinese Society” in Zedong, Mao (1967), Selected Works, vol. I, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Peking