If they're so rich, why ain't they smart? Another prelude to the critique of economic theory

Freeman, Alan (1997): If they're so rich, why ain't they smart? Another prelude to the critique of economic theory. Published in: SSRN accepted papers series No. Paper 2217892 (14 February 2013)

Abstract

This is a mirror, deposited with MPRA for completeness, of the same paper at the Social Science Research Network, which can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2217892.

It should be cited as 'Freeman, Alan. 1997. If They're so Rich, Why Aren't They Smart? Another Prelude to the Critique of Economic Theory (November 6, 1997). European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy (EAEPE), 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2217892'

Economics, it argues, has lost its way and has proven itself incapable of reasoning or explaining the world we observe. Increasingly, it plays a religious rather than an explanatory role. The reason for this is the substitution of a dogma – equilibrium, or comparative statics – for scientific enquiry.

This is illustrated by a detailed discussion of the profession’s treatment of Marx’s value theory. It has substituted, for Marx’s own theory, an equilibrium ‘reading’ of Marx that removes, from the theory, its capacity to explain crisis.

The article was written at a time when an alternative reading of Marx – which became known as the TSSI or Temporal Single System Interpretation – had been made available to the academic world, at a time when there were still grounds to expect that this discovery might be received in a scientific manner.

The article presages subsequent development of the debate, in the course of which the defenders of the equilibrium reading have systematically refused to engage with the temporal alternative. The fact that the temporal reading was not accepted, it argues, is evidence of a profound malaise at the heart of economics, to which academic Marxist economics is no exception. The equilibrium paradigm is at the root of what is now, in 2009, coming to be called the ‘systemic failure’ of economics. It is what renders economics impervious, theoretically, to theoretical comprehension of the world around it.

In the dock, the paper argues, is not Marx but Marx’s target: the economics profession. This is not just a question for scholars but millions – probably billions – of victims of the market economics of the 20th Century. If the conclusions of this paper are true, then a very powerful weapon is available to these victims, of which they have been deprived for more than eighty years by the neoclassical reading of Marx: Marx’s own ideas.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: TSSI, Value Theory, Crisis
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian

References

Andrews, M. (1984), 'On the Importance of the Equilibrium Assumption to the Okishio Theorem Result', Working Paper, Rutgers University.

Bortkiewicz, L von. (1952), 'Value and Price in the Marxian System'(part I), in International Economic Papers, 1952(2), 5-60. Originally published in two parts in German as 'Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System', (part I) Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Band XXIII (I), July 1906; (parts II and III) Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Band XXV, July and September 1907.

Bortkiewicz, L von. (1984), 'On the Correction of Marx's Fundamental Theoretical Construction in the Third Volume of Capital', in Sweezy (1984), German edition 'Zur Berichtigung der grundlengenden theoretischen Konstruktion von Marx im dritten Band des Kapital', Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Serie 3, Band XXIV, July 1907.

Brewer, A (1995) ‘Marx as an Economist’, History of Political Economy 27:1

Card, David and Krueger, Paul (1995) Myth and Measurement

De Brunhoff, S. (1976). Marx on Money. Urizen (Original: “La Monnaie Chez Marx”, Éditions Sociales, Paris, 1976).

Dobb, M. (1989), Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith. Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press.

dos Santos Ferreira, R (1997) ‘Le chômage involuntaire, un concept refoulé’, manuscript, 1997 conference of the European Society for the History of Economic Thought

Ernst, John R. (1982), 'Simultaneous Valuation Extirpated: A Contribution to the Critique of the Neo-Ricardian Concept of Value', Review of Radical Political Economics 14(2):pp85-94.

Foley, D. (1982). ‘Realization and accumulation in a Marxian model of the circuit of capital’. Journal of Economic Theory 28(2): 300-319.

Foley, D. (1986). Money, Accumulation and Crisis. New York: Har¬wood Academic.

Foley, D. (1986). Understanding capital : Marx’s economic theory. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.

Foley, D. (1995) ‘Comment on Brewer’, History of Political Economy 27:1

Foley, D. (1997) review of Freeman and Carchedi (1995) in Eastern Economic Journal, forthcoming.

Freeman, A and Carchedi, G(1995) Marx and non-equilibrium economics, Edward Elgar.

Freeman, Alan and Guglielmo Carchedi, eds. 1996. Marx and Non- cquhlibrium Economics. Brookfield, Vemiont: Edward Elgar.

Freeman, Alan. (1996a). The psychopathology of Walrasian Marxism. In Free¬man and Carchedi, eds., 1996,1-28.

Freeman, Alan. 1996b. Price, value and profit-a continnolLs, general, treat¬ment. In Freeman and Carchedi, eds., 1996, 225-279.

Freeman, Alan.(1995) ‘Marx without Equilibrium’. Capital and Class Winter 1995

Gattei, Giorgio. (1982), 'Les Chaires “Ratées” de Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz', Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, Volume 20 No. 62.

Giussani , (1991), 'The Determination of Prices of Production', International Journal of Political Economy, Vol 21, Winter (1991-1992), pp67-87.

Harley, S and Lee, Fred(1995), The academic labour process and the research assessment exercise: Academic diversity and the future of non-mainstream economics in UK Universities. Leicester: De Montfort University

Husson , M (1982) Le problème de la transformation des valeurs en prix de production: Contre Sraffa.Unpublished book manuscript

Husson, M (writing as Perez,M) (1980) ‘Valeur et prix: un essai de critique des propositions néo-ricardiennes’, Critiques de l’Économie Politique, nouvelle Séries No 10

Jaffé, W. (ed.). (1965), Correspondence of Léon Walras and related papers. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

Kahn, R. (1976) ‘Unemployment as seen by the Keynesians’ in Worswick, G. D. N. (ed.), The Concept and Measurement of Involuntary Unemployment, London: George Allen and Unwin. Pp 19-34

Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London:Macmillan

Keynes, J. M. (1973) in Moggridge, D. (ed), The general Theory and After, I: Preparation, II:Defence and development, London:McMillan

King, John E (1996) review of Freeman and Carchedi (1995) in Economic Record.

Kliman, A. (1988), 'The Profit Rate Under Continuous Technologi¬cal Change', Review of Radical Political Economics 20:2 & 3.

Kliman, A. and McGlone, T. (1988), 'The Transformation non Problem and the non Transformation Problem', Capital and Class, 35, Summer, pp56 83.

Langston, R (1984) ‘A new approach to the relation between prices and values’ in Mandel, E and Freeman, A (eds) (1984) Marx, Ricardo, Sraffa. London:Verso

Lindert, P (1986) International Economics. Illinois: Irwin

Marx (1972), Theories of Surplus Value Volume III. London:Lawrence and Wishart

Marx, K. (1981). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume III. London, Penguin.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. London, Penguin.

Moseley, Fred (1993). “Marx's Logical Method and the Transformation Problem,”in Moseley (ed.), Marx's Method in 'Capital': A Reexamination, Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.

Naples, Michele I. (1985), 'Dynamic Adjustment and Long-run Inflation in a Marxian Model', Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics Fall (1985), Vol 8 No. 1.

Naples, Michele I. (1988a), 'Is a Uniform Profit Rate Possible? A Logical-Historical Analysis', Science and Society Vol 52 No. 1, Spring (1988), pp83-93.

Naples, Michele I. (1989), 'A Radical Economic Revision of the Transformation Problem', Review of Radical Political Economics, 21 (1 2), pp137 158.

Ormerod, P (1994) The Death of Economics. London:Faber and Faber

Pasinetti, L (1976) Lectures on the theory of Production. New York:Columbia

Ramos Martinez, A and A. Rodriguez-Herrera. (1996).’ The trans¬formation of values into prices of production: a different reading of Marx's text’. In Freeman and Carchedi, eds., (1996), 49-76.

Ross, D (1995) Aristotle. London:Routledge

Sambursky, S. (1987) The physical world of the Greeks :Princeton

Samuelson, P, Dorfman and Solow(1958) Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York:Rand

Samuelson, Paul A. 1971. Understanding the Marxian notion of exploitation: a summary of the so-called 'transformation problem' between Marxian values and competitive prices. Journal of Economic Literature 9(2): 399-431.

Savran, S (1982) PhD Thesis

Shaikh, Anwar (1984) The Transformation from Marx to Sraffa. In Mandel. E and A. Freeman (Eds.) Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa Verso. London.

Socialist Economic Bulletin research paper #1, available from Ken Livingstone, MP, House of Commons, London SW1

Sraffa, Piero. (1960), Production of Commodities By Means Of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Steedman, Ian. (1977), Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.

Todaro, M (1994) Economic Development New York and London:Longman

Walras, L. (1984), Éléments d’Économie politique pure, Translated by Jaffé as Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth, London:George Allen and Unwin (1954)

Wolff, R. D., Roberts, B. and Callari, A. (1984), 'A Marxian Alternative to the Traditional “Transformation Problem''' in Review of Radical Political Economics Vol 16(2/3) 115-135 (1984).

Wolff, R. D., Roberts, B. and Callari, A.(l982), 'Marx's (not Ricardo's) “Transformation Problem”: A Radical Reconceptualization'. History of Political Economy, Vol 14 No. 4., pp 564-582.