Matei, Ani and Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia (2012): Coordination of Public Policies through Strategic Planning Instruments: Romania Case study. Published in: NISPAcee Annual Conference, Ohrid, 2012 , Vol. CD, No. CD (2012): pp. 1-12.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53674.pdf Download (209kB) | Preview |
Abstract
If improved public administration can be characterized as “doing things right” then the policy making process might be described as determining the appropriate things to do, so that government is “doing the right things”.
In Romania as in other transition economies, public action through government has been restructured to meet the needs of modern “market economies”. Aware of its policy-making weaknesses, Romania’s government has pursued various reforms in the last few years. The reforms introduced followed among others the strengthening of the government to create the system and mechanisms for horizontal coordination of public policies. The reasons are numerous and various, including the need to manage and maximize the efficacy of limited resources, intermission between international policies and public policy areas.
Solving the problems in a coherent manner require efficient coordination, improving cooperation between ministries and involving citizens in planning. The quality of public policy depends on a large extent on the activities of consultation and coordination, developed on one hand inside the public institutions belonging to the executive power, and on the other hand between public institutions and representatives bodies, group of interest, and the strategic planning.
Therefore, an important role in the public policy process is played by the strategic planning; its various elements can contribute directly to the understanding and formulation of policy priorities and goals. Strategic planning may be though as a “way of knowing” intended to help policy makers and managers to discern what to do, how and why.
Moreover, the institutional and legislative approach of the public policies is based on one side on the institutional management, by using instruments such as: planning of the resources or the strategic planning, and on the other side the adaptation and actualization of the necessary legislative framework.
In Romania, according to the strategy of improvement the elaboration, coordination and planning system of the public policies at the level of central public administration, the strategic planning is introduced in two stages: the management component of the strategic plans and the program budgeting component. The strategic plan plays the role of an instrument that promotes coherent public policies, ensures quality and the right justification of the public policies, and backs up the main policies to be financed.
Using the theoretical, analytical, and empirical framework, described by various scholars and by strategic documents carried out by Romania, this paper aims:
- to explore the conceptual dimension of policy instruments and strategic planning;
- to identify the mechanisms and institutions involve within strategic planning process and public policies coordination;
- to achieve a progressive analysis of the efforts made by Romania to improve the public policy process, outlining the using of strategic planning within public policy making;
The conclusions will reveal the progresses made by Romania to use the strategic planning and the possible inconsistencies and weaknesses within public policy process.
For achieving the aims of the actual paper we have used bibliographical research and study of legislation applied to domestic public policies as well as the study of procedural and strategic documents carried out by Romanian authorities for supporting the public policy-making.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Coordination of Public Policies through Strategic Planning Instruments: Romania Case study |
English Title: | Coordination of Public Policies through Strategic Planning Instruments: Romania Case study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | public policymaking, strategic planning, policy instruments |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation |
Item ID: | 53674 |
Depositing User: | Assist. Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2014 01:36 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:51 |
References: | Acheson, Dean. 1969. Present at the Creation. New York, W.W. Norton, in Drezner, Daniel. 2009. The Challenging Future of Strategic Planning”, Avoiding Trivia, vol. 33:1. Bakvis, Herman and Luc Juillet. 2004. Le défi de l'horizontalité: ministères responsables, organismes centraux et leadership. Ottawa: École de la fonction publique du Canada available at: http://www.cspsefpc. gc.ca/pbp/pub/pdfs/P124_e.pdf. Bondar, Florin. 2007. Reforma formulării politicilor publice între schimbarea premiselor şi schimbarea presupoziţiilor in Bondar, Florin. 2007. Politici publice şi administraţie publică” (in Romanian), Iaşi, Polirom Collegium. Browne, Murray, Jeanine Lanine, and Deo, Kathryn. 2006. Strategic Planning and Policy Development, available at http://www.woodwardandcompany.com/media/pdfs/Strategic_Planning.pdf. Chilosi, Alberto. 2004. Coordination, cooperation and the extended Coasean approach to economic policy, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496169. Dietmar Braun. 2008. Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies, Science and Public Policy, 35(4). Hinţea, Călin and Cristina Mora. 2003. Management strategic în administraţia publică, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, IX. Hogl Karl. 2002. Background Paper on “Inter-Sectoral Co-ordination”. COST-Action E19. Matei, Ani and Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru. 2011. Instruments of Policy Analysis. The Impact Assessment development by public authorities in Romania. Case Study”, NISPAcee, 2011. Matei, Lucica. 2007. Globalization and Public Policies. Transnational actors’ involvement”, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1372064. Matei, Lucica. 2008. Representing the Local Interests in Governmental Policy Making. The Romanian Experiment. Theoretical and Applied Economics, no. 8 (525). Metcalfe, Les. 1994. International Policy Co-ordination and Public Management Reform. in International Review of Administrative Sciences. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, Sage, vol. 60. Metcalfe, Les. 1996. Building Capacities for Integration: The Future Role of the Commission. Eipascope no. 2. OECD. 1996. Globalisation: What challenges and opportunities for governments?. OECD. OECD. 2004. Institutional Approaches to Policy Coherence for Development. OECD Policy Workshop. Pelkonen, Antti, Tuula Teräväinen and Suvi-Tuuli Waltari. 2008. Assessing policy coordination capacity: higher education, science, and technology policies in Finland. Science and Public Policy 35. Pierre, Judith and Goran, C., Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan. PUMA. 1996. Building Policy Coherence: Tools and Tensions. Occasional Papers no. 12 in OECD. 2005. Policy Coherence for Development. Promoting Institutional good practice. OECD Publishing. General Secretariat of Government. 2009. Strategic planning Guideline. available at http://www.sgg.ro/docs/File/UPP/doc/manual%20de%20planificare%20strategica.pdf. SIGMA. 2004. Coordonarea la nivel Guvernamental central: Funcţiile şi organizarea Cabinetului Guvernamental. SIGMA, nr. 35, trans. in Romanian by Public Administration Trainning Department, National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, coordinator, Lucica Matei. Young, Richard, D. 2001. Perspectives on Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. available at http://www.ipspr.sc.edu/publication/perspectives%20on%20Strategic%20Planning.pdf. Zomorrodian, Asghar and Lucica Matei. 2010. Program Evaluation: Its Significance and Priority for Shaping and Modification of Public Policies: A Comparative Analysis. available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1715642. GD no. 870/2006 that approves the Strategy for improving the development, coordination and planning of public policies at central government level. GD. no.750/2005, regarding the Creation of Permanent Inter-ministerial Commissions, published in O.J. of Romania no. 676/28.07.2005. General Secretariat of Government, The Methodology for monitoring and assessing the strategic planning and budgetbased programme documents within Ministry of Administration and Interior, approved through Minister Order no. 269/2010. Government Strategy for strengthening the public administration reform (2001 - 2004), available at: http://www.gov.ro/upload/articles/100008/reforma-admin-public.pdf. Minister Order no. 283/2009, for approval the Organization and Functioning Statute of Public Policy Unit. The Strategy for a better regulation at central level (2008 - 2013) available at: http://www.sgg.ro/docs/File/UPP/doc/proiecte_finale/Strategia_BR_varianta_finala_aprobata_de_Guvern.pdf, accessed on May 20, 2012. http://www.mie.ro/_documente/politici_publice/informatii_utile/elaborare_pp.pdf accessed on March 14, 2012. http://www.sgg.ro/docs/File/UPP/doc/coordonarea-pp-Florin_Bondar.pdf, accessed on March 10, 2012. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53674 |