Hwang, In Chang and Reynes, Frederic and Tol, Richard (2014): The effect of learning on climate policy under fat-tailed uncertainty.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53681.pdf Download (864kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We construct an endogenous (Bayesian) learning model with fat-tailed uncertainty on the equilibrium climate sensitivity and solve the model with stochastic dynamic programming. In our model a decision maker updates her belief on the climate sensitivity through temperature observations each time period and takes a course of action (carbon reductions) based on her belief. We find that the uncertainty is partially resolved over time, although the rate of learning is relatively slow, and the decision maker with a possibility of learning lowers the efforts to reduce carbon emissions relative to the no-learning case. The larger the tail effect, the larger the counteracting learning effect. Learning at least partly offsets the tail-effect of deep uncertainty. This is intuitive in that the decision maker fully utilizes the information revealed to reduce uncertainty, and thus she can make a decision contingent on the updated information. In addition, with various scenarios, we find that learning enables the economic agent to have less regrets for her past actions after the true value of the uncertain variable turns out to be different from the initial best guess. Furthermore the optimal decisions in the learning case are less sensitive to the true value of the uncertain variable than the decisions in the uncertainty case. The reason is that learning lets uncertainty converge to the true value of the state in the sense that the variance approaches 0 as information accumulates.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The effect of learning on climate policy under fat-tailed uncertainty |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Climate policy; deep uncertainty; Bayesian learning; integrated assessment; stochastic dynamic programming |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 53681 |
Depositing User: | Dr. IN CHANG HWANG |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2014 04:19 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 13:19 |
References: | Allen M, Andronova N, Booth B, Dessai S, Frame D, Forest C, Gregory J, Hegerl G, Knutti R, Piani C (2006) Observational constraints on climate sensitivity. In: Schellnhuber HJ (ed) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Annan JD, Hargreaves JC (2011) On the generation and interpretation of probabilistic estimates of climate sensitivity. Climatic Change 104:423-436. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2008) The Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution (FUND), Technical Description, Version 3.3. Available at www.fund-model.org Arrow KJ (1957) Statistics and economic policy. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society 523-531. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. The review of economic studies 155-173. Arrow KJ, Fisher AC (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 88:312-319. Baker MB, Roe GH (2009) The shape of things to come: why is climate change so predictable? Journal of Climate 22:4574-4589. Bartz S, Kelly D (2008) Economic Growth and the Environment: Theory and Facts. Resource and Energy Economics 30:115-149. Blackwell D, Neyman J (1951) Comparison of experiments. Proceedings of the second Berkeley 1:415-418. Cai Y, Judd KL, Lontzek TS (2012a) Open Science is Necessary. Nature Climate Change 2(5):299. Cai Y, Judd KL, Lontzek TS (2012b) DSICE: A dynamic stochastic integrated model of climate and economy. The Center for Robust Decision Making on Climate and Energy Policy Working Paper No. 12-02. Christiano LJ, Fisher JDM (2000) Algorithms for solving dynamic models with occasionally binding constraints. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24:1179-1232. Cyert RM, DeGroot MH (1974) Rational expectations and Bayesian analysis. The Journal of Political Economy 82:521-536. Etner J (2012) Decision theory under ambiguity. Journal of Economic Surveys 26(2):234-270. Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18:149-157. Grossman SJ, Kihlstrom RE, Mirman LJ (1977) A Bayesian approach to the production of information and learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies 44(3):533-547. Guillerminet ML, Tol RSJ (2008) Decision making under catastrophic risk and learning: the case of the possible collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Climatic Change 91:193-209. Hansen J, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms. Geophysical Monograph Series 29:130-163. Hennlock M (2009) Robust control in global warming management: An analytical dynamic integrated assessment. RFF Discussion Paper No. 09-19 University of Gothenburg. Henry C (1974) Investment decisions under uncertainty: the irreversibility effect. The American Economic Review 64:1006-1012. Hwang IC, Reynès F, Tol RSJ (2013a) Climate policy under fat-tailed risk: An application of Dice. Environmental and Resource Economics 56(3):415-436. Hwang IC, Tol RSJ, Hofkes M (2013b) Active learning about climate change. Sussex University Working Paper Series No. 65-2013. Hwang IC (2014) Fat-tailed uncertainty and the learning-effect. Unpublished manuscript. Available upon request by the author. Ingham A, Ma J, Ulph A (2007) Climate change, mitigation and adaptation with uncertainty and learning. Energy Policy 35:5354-5369. Judd KL (1998) Numerical methods in economics.The MIT press, Cambridge, MA, U.S. Judd KL, Maliar L, Maliar S (2011) Numerically stable and accurate stochastic simulation approaches for solving dynamic economic models. Quantitative Economics 2:173-210. Keller K, Bolker BM, Bradford DF (2004) Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48:723-741. Kelly DL, Kolstad CD (1999) Bayesian learning, growth, and pollution. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23:491-518. Kelly DL, Tan Z (2013) Learning and Climate Feedbacks: Optimal Climate Insurance and Fat Tails. University of Miami Working Paper. Kendrick DA (2005) Stochastic control for economic models: past, present and the paths ahead. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29:3-30. Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes. Nature Geoscience 1:735-743. Kolstad CD (1996a) Learning and stock effects in environmental regulation: the case of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31:1-18. Kolstad CD (1996b) Fundamental irreversibilities in stock externalities. Journal of Public Economics 60:221-233. Koop G, Poirier DJ, Tobias L (2007) Bayesian Econometric Methods (Econometric Exercises). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Lemoine D, Traeger C (2014) Watch Your Step: Optimal Policy in a Tipping Climate, American Economics Journal:Economic Policy (forthcoming). Marten A (2011) Transient temperature response modeling in IAMs: The effects of over simplification on the SCC. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 5, 2011-18. Leach AJ (2007) The climate change learning curve. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31:1728-1752. Maliar L, Maliar S (2005) Solving nonlinear stochastic growth models: iterating on value function by simulations. Economics Letters 87:135-140. Millner A, Dietz S, Heal G (2013) Scientific ambiguity and climate policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 55:21-46. Miranda MJ, Fackler PL (2004) Applied computational economics and finance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, U.S. Nordhaus WD, Popp D (1997) What is the value of scientific knowledge? An application to global warming using the PRICE model. The Energy Journal 18:1-46. Nordhaus WD (2008) A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press, New Haven and London. Oppenheimer M, O’Neill BC, Webster M (2008) Negative learning. Climatic Change 89:155-172. Peck SC, Teisberg TJ (1993) Global warming uncertainties and the value of information: an analysis using CETA. Resource and Energy Economics 15:71-97. Pindyck RS (2002) Optimal timing problems in environmental economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26:1677-1697. Prescott E (1972) The multi-period control problem under uncertainty. Econometrica 40:1043-1048. Roe GH, Baker MB (2007) Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318(5850):629-632. Rust J (1996) Numerical dynamic programming in economics. Handbook of computational economics 1:619-729. Stocky NL, Lucas RE (1989) Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Harvard University Press. Tol RSJ (2003) Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis? Climatic Change 56:265-289. Tol RSJ (2013) Targets for global climate policy: An overview. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37:911-928. Tol RSJ, De Vos AF (1998) A Bayesian statistical analysis of the enhanced greenhouse effect. Climatic Change 38(1):87-112. Ulph A, Ulph D (1997) Global warming, irreversibility and learning. The Economic Journal 107:636-650. Webster M (2002) The curious role of learning in climate policy: should we wait for more data? The Energy Journal 23(2):97-119. Webster M, Jakobovits L, Norton J (2008) Learning about climate change and implications for near-term policy. Climatic Change 89:67-85. Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 91:1-19. Weitzman ML (2012) GHG Targets as Insurance Against Catastrophic Climate Damages. Journal of Public Economic Theory 14(2):221-244. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53681 |