PAC Congressional Election Campaign Contributions and Other Political or Economic Influences on the Voter Participation Rate

Cebula, Richard (2006): PAC Congressional Election Campaign Contributions and Other Political or Economic Influences on the Voter Participation Rate. Published in: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology , Vol. 66, No. 2 (30 April 2007): pp. 399-412.

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the potential impact of political action committee (PAC) election campaign contributions and other factors on the aggregate voter participation rate in the United States. For the study period 1960-1998, the aggregate voter participation rate appears to have been positively and significantly affected by the opportunity to vote in presidential elections and by the Vietnam War, as well as by "excessive" inflation and slow real GDP growth . The latter two findings of this study appear to be unique to this literature. In addition, the Watergate scandal and increased public dissatisfaction with government appear to have significantly discouraged voter participation. Finally, there appears to be strong evidence that PAC congressional election campaign contributions may have also acted to reduce the voter participation rate over the study period, a finding that also is unique to this study.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: voter participation rate; expected benefits from voting; expected costs of voting; PAC election campaign contributions
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D10 - General; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R20 - General

References

Buchanan, J.M., and G. Tullock. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Cebula, R.J. (2001). "The Electoral College and Voter Participation: Evidence on Two Hypotheses Using Results from the 1996 Presidential Election." Atlantic Economic Journal 29: 304-311.

Cebula, R.J., and C. Paul. (2002). "A Note on the Determinants of Public Dissatisfaction with Government: Economic and Political Factors Affect­ing the Public's Attitude Toward Government." American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61: 495-501.

Copeland, C., and D. Laband. (2002). "Economic Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior." Public Choice 110: 351-363.

Council of Economic Advisors. (2001). Economic Report of the President, 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Cox, G.W., and M.C. Munger. (1989). "Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in 1982 U.S. House Elections." American Political Science Review 83: 217-231.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Lapp, M. (1999). "Incorporating Groups into Rational Choice Explanations of Turnout: An Empirical Test." Public Choice 98: 171-185.

Matsusaka, J.G., and F. Palda. (1999). "Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?" Public Choice 98: 431-446.

Riker, W.H., and P.C. Ordeshook. (1968). "A Theory to the Calculus of Voting." American Political Science Review 62: 25-43.

Tiebout, C.M. (1956). "A Pure Theory of Public Expenditures." Journal of Political Economy 64: 416-424.

Tullock, G. (1971). "Public Decisions as Public Goods." Journal of Political Economy 79: 913-918.