Nababan, Tongam Sihol (2014): The Importance of Understanding the General Education in Strengthening the Higher Education System. Published in: Proceeding of International Seminar on Global Education II Indonesia & Malaysia" at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Kuala Lumpur, 24-25 February 2014 , Vol. 1, No. ISBN 978-983-2267-61-4 (24 February 2014): pp. 776-785.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53910.pdf Download (72kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract Lately the system of modern education has produced reliable scientists and technocrats but has not spawned graduates with the integrity of mature personalities. To overcome this, the concept of General Education (GE) can be applied. GE is the implementation of the concept as a reaction to the tendency of modern society in idolizing the products of technology and tend to ignore human values due to the product of modern secular education system . GE is education aimed in developing the personality of the students in the community and the environment through educational programs that foster and develop all aspects of a student 's personality. Besides that, GE aims to cultivate and create mature understanding in the purpose of life according to the nature of science of all time . With GE, it is expected that students can apply the ethical behaviors and culture when they live in the society . GE programs must be maintained in the curriculum of higher education (universities), but need to be adjusted inaccordance with the times.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Importance of Understanding the General Education in Strengthening the Higher Education System |
English Title: | The Importance of Understanding the General Education in Strengthening the Higher Education System |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords : General Education ( GE ), humanistic, personality, higher education system, integrity. |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions |
Item ID: | 53910 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Tongam Sihol Nababan |
Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2014 08:58 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:09 |
References: | REFERENCES AAC & U (Association Of American Colleges And Universities). (2012), What is a 21st Century Liberal Education ?, AAC&U, 1818 R Street NW, Washington, DC 20009. BSNP (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan). (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI, Versi 1.0-Tahun 2010, http://www.dikti.go.id/dmdocuments/BSNP-ParadigmaAbad21-Editing%20tgl%201%20NOVEMBER.pdf Bunoti, Sarah. (2012). The Quality of Higher Education in Developing Countries Needs Professional Support, The 22nd International Conference on Higher Education Quality in Higher Education, www.intconfhighered.org/FINAL%20Sarah%20Bunoti.pdf City University of Hong Kong. (2012), General Education and University Curriculum Reform:An International Conference in Hong Kong, Held on June 12–14 2012. Cronk, George. (2004). Definitions and Systems of General Education : A Sampling from Various Sources, The Bergen Community College Committee on General Education, USA. Ganeswara, Ganjar Muhammad. (2009). Aktualisasi Pendidikan Umum di UPI dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Lulusannya Sebagai Warga Negara Yang Baik, Sekolah Pasca-arjana Uni-versitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung, file-upi.edu/.../DRAFT_ARTIKEL_JURNAL_DISERT... Hart Research Associates. (2009). Trends and Emergiing Practices in General Education Based On A Survey Among Members Of The Association Of American Colleges And Universities (AAC & U), Hart Research Associates, 1724 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009. Harvard University (2007, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Report of the Task Force on General Education, http://www.generaleducation.fas.harvard.edu/icb IBRD/World Bank. (2000). Higher Education in Developing Countries : Peril and Promise, Task Force on Higher Education and Society, IBRD/World Bank, Washington D.C., USA. Illinois State University. (2012). General Education Task Force Final Report, gened.illinoisstate.edu/.../taskforce/Final Imron, Ali. (2013. Strategi Mewujudkan Kepemimpinan Profetik Transformatif, Prosiding Seminar Nasional UNY, April 2013, www.academia.edu/4871630/. hal. 117-121. Jacobs, Karen Dupre & Kritsonis, William Allan. (2006). National Agenda: Ten Suggestions to Incorporate the Realms of Meaning as a Decision Making Process to Improve Student Achievement in the United States, The Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Research, Spring 2006 (pp 1-5). Karyono, Tri. (2012). Hakekat Pendidikan Nilai dalam Pendidikan Umum, www. file.upi.edu/... memahami-values-dalam-pendidikan. Kosslyn, Stephen M. (2007), Report of the Task Force on General Education, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/02/general-education-task-force-issues-final-report/ Oliver, Shawn L. & Hyun, Eunsook. (2011). Comprehensive Curriculum Reform in Higher Education : Collaborative Engagement of Faculty and Administrators, Journal of Case Studies in Education, Vol. 2, July 2011, (pp 1-20). Soedijarto. (2004). Kurikulum, Sistem Evaluasi, dan Tenaga Pendidikan sebagai Unsur Strategis dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pengajaran Nasional, Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, No.03 / Th.III / Desember 2004, hal. 89-107. Townsell, Rhodena. (2008). National Insight: Six Philosophical Strategies forImplementing The Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning in the Curriculum for General Education, National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2008, (pp 1-6). University of Kentucky. (2008). Design Principles of a Revised General Education Curriculum for the University of Kentucky, www.uky.edu/UGE/documents/Design_Prin.pdf White, Charles R. (1994). A Model for Comprehensive Reform in General Education: Portland State University, Journal of General Education, Vol. 43, No. 3 (pp 168-229). Wibisono, Eric. (1999). Tinjauan Atas Paradigma Kualitas Dalam Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia, Unitas, Vol. 7, No. 2. hal. 72-81. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53910 |