Gul, Ejaz and Chaudhry, Imran Sharif and Faridi, Muhammad Zahir (2014): The Classical-Keynesian Paradigm: Policy Debate in Contemporary Era.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53920.pdf Download (587kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For almost a century, the famous C-K paradigm (formally known as Classics – Keynesian Paradigm) has been the apex of economic debate and research. The paradigm represents two schools of thoughts which, somehow, have prevailed till now. Economists who believe in either of the two schools have been at loggerheads, and they still are, to prove one theory better than the other. Numerous economic scholars of present era believe that with the changes that have occurred in the economic system, the world is turning back to classical model. But, there are others who believe that Keynes theory is still alive and valid. In this paper, we have tried to draw a brief comparison that highlights the major differences between the two theories with specific reference to the economic, political and social environment prevailing at time when these theories were generated. Paper also discusses the relevance of unending policy debate about these theories in the current era with special emphasis on policy implications with a view to draw pertinent lessons for the present and future.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Classical-Keynesian Paradigm: Policy Debate in Contemporary Era |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Classical, Keynesian, economics, theories, policy, debate, implications |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B11 - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics |
Item ID: | 53920 |
Depositing User: | Mr Ejaz Gul |
Date Deposited: | 26 Feb 2014 07:42 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:49 |
References: | Barker, T.C. (1977), "The Beginnings of the Economic History Society", Economic History Review Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–19. Barro, Robert J. and David Gordon (1983), “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy” Journal of Monetary Economics, July, 12:1, pp. 101–21. Blanchard, Olivier (2011), Macroeconomics, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, pp. 203-209. Blaug, M. (2001), “No history of ideas please, we are economists” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (winter), pp.145-164. Boettke, Peter (2001), Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy, Routledge, pp 223-229. Buchholz, Todd G. (1989), New Ideas from Dead Economists, New York, Penguin Group. p. 151-153. Cameron, Rondo and Larry Neal (2003), A Concise Economic History of the World: From Paleolithic Times to the Present, Oxford, pp. 480-483. Chari, V. Lawrence J. and Patrick J. (1991), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy: Some Recent Results.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, August, 23:3, pp. 519–539. Chari, V. Lawrence J. and Patrick J. (1996), “Optimality of the Friedman Rule in Economies with Distorting Taxes.” Journal of Monetary Economics, April, 37:2, pp. 203–223. Coleman, William O. (2002), Economics and Its Enemies: Two Centuries of Anti-Economics, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 109-113. Davis, John B. (2008), “The turn in recent economics and return of heterodoxy” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, pp. 349-366. De Long, J. Bradford. (2000), “The triumph of monetarism?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (1), pp. 83–94. Dwivedi, D.N. (2001), Macroeconomics: theory and policy. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, pp. 189-193. Eichengreen B. (1992), Golden Fetters: the Gold Standard and the Great Depression 1919-1939 London, Oxford University Press, pp. 145-163. Ekelund, Robert B., Jr. and Robert F. Hébert (2007), History of Economic Theory and Method, Waveland Press, pp. 309-313. Friedman, Milton (1953), Essays in Positive Economics, London: University of Chicago Press, pp 13-35. Froyen Richard T. (2006), Macroeconomics: Theories and Policies, Prentice Hall, pp. 57-239. Garrison, Roger W. (2001), Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. New York: Routledge, pp 63-69. Goodwin, Craufurd D. (2008), “History of economic thought”, Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 133-163. Heijdra, B. J. Ploeg, F.van der (2002), Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics, Oxford University Press, pp. 211-216. Howey, Richard S. (1982), A Bibliography of General Histories of Economics 1692-1975, Lawrence, The Regent Press of Kansas, pp. 267-281. Horwitz, Steven. (2000), Micro foundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 196-199. Lawson, Tony (1997), Economics and reality: London and New York, Routledge, pp. 56-59. Lawson, Tony. (2006), “The nature of heterodox economics” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, pp. 483-505. Lee, Frederic S. (2009), A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century, Routledge, pp. 116-126. Mankiw N. Gregory. (2009), Macroeconomics, Cambridge University, pp. 3-77. Markwell, Donald. (2006), John Maynard Keynes and International Relations: Economic Paths to War and Peace, Oxford University Press, pp. 267-283. Medema, Steven G., and Warren J. Samuels. (2003), The History of Economic Thought: A Reader. Routledge, pp 86-92. Mishkin, Frederic S. (2004), The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets, Boston: Addison-Wesley, p. 517-527. Nasar, Sylvia. (2011), Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius, Simon & Schuster, pp. 313-314. Phelps, Edmund S. (1990), Seven Schools of Macroeconomic Thought, Oxford University Press. Pressman, Steven (2006), Fifty Major Economists, Routledge, pp. 136-146. Reinhart, Carmen M and Kenneth S Rogoff (2009), This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 312-329. Snowdon, Brian, H. R. Vane. (2005), Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development And Current State, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 125-176. Snowdon, Brian, H. R. Vane, and Peter W. (1994), A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics: An Introduction to Competing Schools of Thought. Edward Elgar, pp. 336-396. State Bank of Pakistan. (2012), Statements of Monetary and Fiscal Policies 2012013, pp. 23-26. Warsh, David. (2006), Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations, Norton, pp. 107-110. Weintraub, E. Roy (1999), "How Should We Write the History of Twentieth-Century Economics?" Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15(4), pp. 45-78. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53920 |