A short-but-efficient test for overconfidence and prospect theory. Experimental validation

Peon, David and Calvo, Anxo and Antelo, Manel (2014): A short-but-efficient test for overconfidence and prospect theory. Experimental validation.

Abstract

Two relevant areas in the behaviorist literature are prospect theory and overconfidence. Many tests are available to elicit their different manifestations: utility curvature, probability weighting and loss aversion in PT; overestimation, overplacement and overprecision as measures of overconfidence. Those tests are suitable to deal with single manifestations but often unfeasible, in terms of time to be performed, to determine a complete psychological profile of a given respondent. This paper contributes to provide two short tests, based on classic works in the literature, to derive a complete profile on prospect theory and overconfidence. We conduct an experimental research with 126 students to validate the tests, revealing they are broadly efficient to replicate the regular results in the literature. The experimental analysis of all measures of overconfidence and prospect theory using the same sample of respondents allows us to provide new insights on the relationship between these two areas. Finally, enhancements for future research are suggested.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Experimental economics, overconfidence, prospect theory, behavioral finance, utility measurement, overestimation, overplacement, overprecision
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

References

Abdellaoui, M. (2000), Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions, Management Science 46(11), 1497-1512.

Abdellaoui, M., H. Bleichrodt and C. Paraschiv (2007), Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement, Management Science 53(10), 1659-1674.

Abdellaoui, M., H. Bleichrodt and O. L’Haridon (2008), A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36, 245-266.

Bleichrodt, H. and J.L. Pinto (2000), A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis, Management Science 46(11), 1485–1496.

Booij, A.S., B.M.S. van Praag and G. van de Kuilen (2010), A parametric analysis of prospect’s theory functionals for the general population, Theory and Decision 68, 115-148.

Bowman, D., M. Minehart and M. Rabin (1999), Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38, 155-178.

Daniel, K.D., D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam (2001), Overconfidence, arbitrage and equilibrium asset pricing, The Journal of Finance 56, 921-965.

De Bondt, W.F.M. and R.H. Thaler (1995), Financial Decision-Making in Markets and Firms: A Behavioral Perspective, In R. Jarrow et al. (eds) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 9, Amsterdam: Elsevier:385–410.

Donkers, A.C.D., B. Melenberg and A.H.O. van Soest (2001), Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: a large sample approach, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 22, 165-195.

Gonzalez, R. and G. Wu (1999), On the shape of the probability weighting function, Cognitive Psychology 38(1), 129-166.

Hens, T. and K. Bachmann (2008): Behavioural finance for private banking, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Jemaiel, S., C. Mamoghli and W. Seddiki (2013), An experimental analysis of over-confidence, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 3, 395-417.

Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(2), 263-291.

Köbberling, V. and P. Wakker (2005), An index of loss aversion, Journal of Economic Theory 122, 119-131.

Kuyper, H. and P. Dijkstra (2009), Better-than-average effects in secondary education: A 3-year follow-up, Educational Research and Evaluation 15(2), 167-184.

Kwan, V.S.Y., O.P. John, D.A. Kenny, M.H. Bond and R.W. Robins (2004), Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach, Psychological Review 111(1), 94-110.

Lichtenstein, S., B. Fischhoff and L.D. Phillips (1982), Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980, In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press.

Lundeberg, M.A., P.W. Fox and J. Punccohar (1994), Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments, Journal of Educational Psychology 86, 114-121.

Moore, D.A. and P.J. Healy (2008), The trouble with overconfidence, Psychological Review 115(2), 502–517.

Moore, D.A. and D.A. Small (2007), Error and bias in comparative social judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(6), 972-989.

Neilson, W.S. (2002), Comparative risk sensitivity with reference-dependent preferences, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 131-142.

Peón, D., M. Antelo and A. Calvo (2014), Overconfidence and risk seeking in credit markets: An experimental game, Mimeo. Available upon request to the authors.

Prelec, D. (1998), The probability weighting function, Econometrica 66(3), 497-527.

Rabin, M. (2000), Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem, Econometrica 68(5), 1281-1292.

Rötheli, T.F. (2012), Oligopolistic banks, bounded rationality, and the credit cycle, Economics Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 961316, 4 pages, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/961316.

Sandroni, A. and F. Squintani (2009), Overconfidence and asymmetric information in insurance markets, unpublished WP available at www.imtlucca.it/whats_new/_seminars_docs/000174-paper_Squintani_April6.pdf

Schmidt, U. and S. Traub (2002), An experimental test of loss aversion, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25, 233-249.

Shefrin, H. (2008), Ending the management illusion: How to drive business results using the principles of behavioral finance, Mc-Graw Hill, 1st edition.

Soll, J.B. and J. Klayman (2004), Overconfidence in interval estimates, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30(2), 299-314.

Stankov, L., G. Pallier, V. Danthiir and S. Morony (2012), Perceptual underconfidence: A conceptual illusion?, European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28(3), 190-200.

Stott, H.P. (2006), Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32, 101-130.

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992), Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4), 297-323.

Wakker, P.P. (2008), Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family, Health Economics 17, 1329-1344. Wakker, P.P. (2010), Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity, Cambridge University Press.

Wakker, P.P. and A. Tversky (1993), An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 147-176.

Windschitl, P.D., J. Kruger and E. Simms (2003), The influence of egocentrism and focalism on people's optimism in competitions: When what affects us equally affects me more, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(3), 389-408.

Wu, G. and R. Gonzalez (1996), Curvature of the probability weighting function, Management Science 42(12), 1676-1690.

Zell, E. and M.D. Alicke (2011), Age and the better-than-average, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 41(5), 1175-88.