Nguyen Viet, Cuong and Van den Berg, Marrit (2011): The impact of Informal Credit on Poverty and Inequality: The Case of Vietnam.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54758.pdf Download (156kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The informal credit market remains an important source of finance for the poor in Vietnam. Yet, little if anything is known about the ultimate impact of informal loans on poverty and inequality. If informal credit is an important means to decrease poverty, the government may want to reconsider its policy focus. Although it is possible to stimulate the availability of informal credit, the Vietnamese government has no policies to do so and focuses solely on direct provision of microfinance. In this paper we therefore estimate the average effect of informal credit on expenditures of borrowing households, and subsequently assess its impact on poverty and inequality. By using fixed-effect regressions with instrumental variables, we intend to eliminate the potential bias caused by differences between participants and non-participants in credit markets. We find that the poor borrowed proportionally more from informal sources than the non-poor and that informal credit was quite effective in decreasing poverty: it reduced the poverty incidence of borrowers by 8 percentage points and the overall poverty incidence of population by 1.4 percentage points in 2006. Similarly, informal credit significantly decreased the poverty gap index and the poverty-severity index. The effects on expenditure inequality were small.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The impact of Informal Credit on Poverty and Inequality: The Case of Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Micro-credit, informal credit, poverty, inequality, Vietnam |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty |
Item ID: | 54758 |
Depositing User: | Cuong Nguyen Viet |
Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2014 15:10 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:29 |
References: | Agénor, P.R. and Montiel, P. J. 1999. Development Macroeconomics (2nd edn), Princeton, NJ: Armendáriz de Aghion, B. and J. Morduch. 2005. The Economics of Microfinance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Barslund, M. and Tarp, F. 2008. “Formal and Informal Rural Credit in Four Provinces of Vietnam.” Journal of Development Studies Vol. 44, No. 4, 485–503. Bell, C., T.N. Srinivasan, and C. Udry. 1997. “Rationing, Spillover, and Interlinking in Credit Markets: The Case of Rural Punjab.” Oxford Economic Papers 49:557–85. Bose, P. 1998. “Formal–informal Sector Interaction in Rural Credit Markets.” Journal of Development Economics Vol. 56: 265–280 Boucher, S., Carter, M., & Guirkinger, C. 2008. “Risk Rationing and Wealth Effects in Credit Markets: Theory and Implications for Agricultural Development.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2), 409–423. Conning, J., & Udry, C. 2005. “Rural Financial Markets in Developing Countries.” In R. Evenson, P. Pingali, & T. Schultz (Eds.). The Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 3). North-Holland: Elsevier. Deaton Angus. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. Foster, James., J. Greer, E. Thorbecke. 1984. “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures.” Econometrica 52, 761-765. Fuentes, GA. 1996. “The Use Of Village Agents In Rural Credit Delivery.” Journal of Development Studies 33(2): 188-209. Guirkinger C. 2008. “Understanding the Coexistence of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Piura, Peru.” World Development Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 1436–1452. Heckman, J., R. Lalonde and J. Smith. 1999. "The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs", Handbook of Labor Economics 3, Ashenfelter, A. and D. Card, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Hoff, K., and J. Stiglitz. 1990. “Imperfect Information and Rural Credit Markets: Puzzles and Policy Perspectives.” World Bank Economic Review 5:235–50. Jain, S. 1999. “Symbiosis vs. Crowding-out: the Interaction of Formal and Informal Credit Markets in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics Vol. 59: 419–444. Kochar, A. 1997. “An Empirical Investigation of Rationing Constraints in Rural Credit Markets in India.” Journal of Development Economics 53:339–71. McCarty, A. 2001. “Microfinance in Vietnam. A Survey of Schemes and Issues.” State Bank of Vietnam. Morduch, J. 1999. The Microfinance Promise.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (4): 1569-1614. Morduch, J. and B. Haley. 2002. “Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction, NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014, New York University Nagarajan G., Meyer R. L., and L. J. Hushak. 1995. “Segmentation in the Informal Credit Markets: the Case of the Philippines.” Agricultural Economics 12 (1995) 171-181 Nguyen, V.C. 2008. “Is a Governmental Microcredit Program for the Poor really Pro-poor? Evidence from Vietnam.” The Developing Economies 46 (2), pp: 151 – 187. Pham, T. T. T. and Lensink R. 2007. “Lending Policies of Informal, Formal and Semiformal Lenders.” Economics of Transition, Volume 15(2) 2007, 181–209. Pham, T. T. T. and Lensink R. 2008. “Is Microfinance an Important Instrument for Poverty Alleviation? The Impact of Microcredit Programs on Self-employment Profits in Vietnam.” The Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. Quach, M. H. and A. W. Mullineux. 2007. “The Impact of Access to Credit on Household Welfare in Rural Vietnam.” Research In Accounting In Emerging Economies Vol. 7, pp: 279–307. Varghese, A. 2005. “Bank-Moneylender Linkage as an Alternative To Bank Competition In Rural Credit Markets.” Oxford Economic Papers 57(2): 315-355 Ravallion M. 2001. “The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation.” The World Bank Economic Review 15(1), 115-140. Wooldridge, J. M. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54758 |