Iwata, Hiroki (2014): Disclosure of environmental information and investments of firms.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54784.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In recent years, voluntary approaches are expected to function as new environmental protection tools. This article analyzes whether environmental information of firms should be mandatorily disclosed or disclosed voluntarily, where consumers consider the environmental burdens of firms when buying their goods. If a mandatory policy is implemented, every firm in the market will be required to disclose their environmental burdens. On the contrary, only firms that want to disclose their environmental burdens will share their environmental information if a voluntary approach is implemented. This article particularly demonstrates the effects of the disclosure rule (mandatory or voluntary) on investment to reduce environmental burdens. The model has two types of firms, clean and dirty ones. Firms that investigate their environmental burdens and turn out to be dirty can invest to reduce them and become clean before they disclose their environmental information. The main conclusions in this article are as follows. (1) Mandatory disclosure policies may induce firms to invest more than a voluntary approach. (2) Firms may have lower expected profit under the mandatory rule than the voluntary approach. (3) Under full information disclosure policy, the environmental burden is smaller than that of other policies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Disclosure of environmental information and investments of firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Environmental information disclosure; Investment; Asymmetric information |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L15 - Information and Product Quality ; Standardization and Compatibility Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation |
Item ID: | 54784 |
Depositing User: | Hiroki Iwata |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2014 04:41 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:05 |
References: | (1) Arora, S. and T. Cason, 1996, Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in the EPA’s 33/50 Program. Land Economics, 72, pp. 413-432. (2) Arora, S. and S. Gangopadhyay, 1995, Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28, pp. 289-309. (3) Blanco, E., J. Rey-Maquieria and J. Lozano, 2009, The economic impacts of voluntary environmental performance of firms: a critical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33, pp. 462-502. (4) Cohen, M. A. and V. Santhakumar, 2007, Information disclosure as environmental regulation: a theoretical analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, pp. 599-620. (5) Conrad, K. 2005, Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 31, pp. 1-19. (6) Eriksson, C. 2004, Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated products example. Resource and Energy Economics, 26, pp. 281-293. (7) Friesen, L. 2006, The social welfare implications of industry self-auditing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51, pp. 280-294. (8) Innes, R. and J. J. Bial, 2002, Inducing innovation in the environmental technology of oligopolistic firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, pp. 265-.287. (9) Khanna, M., W. R. H. Quimio, and D. Bojilova, 1998, Toxic release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, pp. 243-266. (10) Kleindorfer, P. R. and E. W. Orts, 1998, Informational regulation of environmental risks. Risk Analysis, 18, pp. 155-170. (11) Lyon, T. P. and J. W. Maxwell, 2003, Self-regulation and public voluntary environmental agreements. Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp. 1453-1486. (12) Polinsky, A. M. and S. Shavell, 2006, Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure of product risk. NBER Working Paper, No. 564. (13) Segerson, K. and T. Miceli, 1998, Voluntary environmental agreements: good or bad news for environmental protection? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, pp. 109-130. (14) Shavell, S. 1994, Acquisition and disclosure of information prior to sale. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, pp. 20-36. (15) Sinclair-Desgagné, B. and E. Gozlan, 2003, A theory of environmental risk disclosure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, pp. 377-393. (16) Tietenberg, T. 1998, Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, pp. 587-602. (17) Tietenberg, T. and D. Wheeler, 2001, Empowering the community: information strategy for pollution control. In: Frontiers of Environmental Economics, (eds Folmer, H., H. L. Gabel, S. Garkin, and A. Rose), pp. 85-120. Edward Elgar, Northampton. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54784 |