Which firms benefit more from being located in a Science and Technology Park? Empirical evidence for Spain

Vásquez-Urriago, Angela and Barge-Gil, Andrés and Modrego, Aurelia (2014): Which firms benefit more from being located in a Science and Technology Park? Empirical evidence for Spain.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyse the heterogeneous effect of Science and Technology Parks (STPs) on firms’ innovation outcomes, contingent on firms’ size and innovation effort. Despite the worldwide diffusion of STPs and the increasing literature aimed at analyzing their effect on tenants’ performance, empirical evidence on the heterogeneous effect of STPs location on different firms is very scarce. We use information for a representative sample of 39,722 Spanish firms, 653 of them located on 22 of the 25 official Spanish STP. Results show, on the one hand, that firm size is negatively related to an STP location effect and, on the other, that only a small amount of internal innovation effort is required to achieve a very high return from park location. However, firms without innovation efforts do not benefit from a park location. Finally, as internal innovation efforts increase, the park effect reduces, but is still at a high level.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Science and Technology Parks, heterogeneous treatment effects, product innovation, firms’ internal innovation capabilities, size
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis ; Public Investment and Capital Stock

References

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69 (4), 567-574.

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78 (4), 678-690.

Angrist, J., & Pishke, J. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: an Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Aschhoff, B., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation – happy together? Review of Industrial Organization, 33, 41-62.

Audretsch, D.B., & Feldman, M.P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-645.

Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Open, semi-open and closed innovators. Towards an explanation of degree of openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577-607.

Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1996). Firm size, small business presence and sales of innovative products: a micro-econometric analysis. Small Business Economics, 8, 189-201.

Caniëls, M. C. J., & Romijn, H. A. (2003). Firm-level knowledge accumulation and regional dynamics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (6), 1253-1278.

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52, 68-82.

Chun H., & Mun S.-B. (2012). Determinants of R&D cooperation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Small Business Economics, 39, 419-436.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.

Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2009). Are local milieus the key to innovation performance? Journal of Regional Science, 49 (1), 81-112.

Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238-250.

Falk, M. (2007). Cross-country and cross-industry patterns in the determinants of innovation output: evidence for 12 EU countries based on CIS 3 micro data. The 2nd European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Utrecht School of Economics: University of Utrecht, Netherlands.

Forman, C., Goldfarb, A., & Greenstein, S. (2008). Understanding the inputs into innovation: Do cities substitute for internal firm resources? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(2), 295-316

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Ed.). London:The MIT Press.

Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38, 1125-1135.

Giuliani, E. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 139-168.

Guo, S., & Fraser, M. (2010). Propensity Score Analysis. Statistical Methods and Applications. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series, 11. SAGE Publications.

Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2009). The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 263-283.

Huang, K.-F., Joseph Yu, C.-M., & Seetoo, D.-H. (2012). Firm innovation in policy-driven parks and spontaneous clusters: the smaller firm the better? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (5), 732-754.

IASP (2002). International Board of Directors, Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation – IASP, February 6, 2002.

Imbens, G., & Wooldridge, J. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 5-86.

Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 984-1001.

Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfor, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 109-121.

Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185-205.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150.

Lazerson, M. H., & Lorenzoni, G. (1999). The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8 (2), 235-266.

Love, J., & Roper, S. (1999). The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43-64.

Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2005). The importance of R&D for innovation: a reassessment using French survey data. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 183-197.

Maskell, P. (2001). The firm in economic geography. Economic Geography, 77 (4), 329-344.

Mohnen, P., Mairesse J., & Dagenais, M. (2006). Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Scientific Series, CIRANO.

Negassi, S. (2004). R&D co-operation and innovation a microeconometric study on French firms. Research Policy, 33, 365-384.

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48 (1), 44-69.

OECD (2005). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2005. OECD Publishing.

Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2013). Is money all? Financing versus knowledge and demand constraints to innovation. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2013-029.

Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33 (1), 35-58.

Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22, 141-153.

Shaver, J., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economics, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1175-1993.

Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31, 10-21.

Tsai, K. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38, 765-778.

Vásquez, A., Barge-Gil, A., Modrego, A., & Paraskevopoulou, E. (2011). The impact of science and technology parks on firms´ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. MPRA Paper 30555, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press