Alcantud, José Carlos R. and de Andrés Calle, Rocío (2014): Hesitant fuzzy sets: The Hurwicz approach to the analysis of project evaluation problems.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55281.pdf Download (334kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We provide a methodology to perfom an extensive and systematized analysis of problems where experts voice their opinions on the attributes of projects through a hesitant fuzzy decision matrix. A weighted average of specific parametric expressions for two tenable indices of satisfaction permits to give a profuse picture of the relative performance of the projects. When the parameter grows, these indices tend to replicate the evaluation by respective simplistic expressions that only depend on the least, resp., the largest, evaluation and the number of evaluations in each cell. This provides the decision-maker with ample information on which he or she can rely in order to make the final decision.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Hesitant fuzzy sets: The Hurwicz approach to the analysis of project evaluation problems |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Hesitant fuzzy set; Group decision making; Project evaluation |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M20 - General |
Item ID: | 55281 |
Depositing User: | Jose Carlos R. Alcantud |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2014 03:46 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:55 |
References: | [1] T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 12(2), pp. 117–131, 1984. [2] J. Fodor and M. Roubens, Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. [3] J. Kacprzyk and H. Nurmi, “Grop decision making under fuzziness,” in Fuzzy sets in Decision Analysis, Operations research and Statistics, R. Slowinski, Ed. Springer, 1998. [4] L. Zadeh, “Outline of a new approach to analysis of complex systems and decision processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp. 28–44, 1973. [5] V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25(6), pp. 529–539, 2010. [6] I. Grattan-Guinness, “Fuzzy membership mapped onto intervals and many-valued quantities,” Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 22, pp. 149–160, 1976. [7] M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, pp. 395–407, 2011. [8] B.Farhadinia,“A novel method of ranking hesitant fuzzy values for multiple attribute decision-making problems, ”International Journalof Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, pp. 752–767, 2013. [9] Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. [10] X. Zhou and Q. Li, “Multiple attribute decision making based on hesitant fuzzy Einstein geometric aggregation operators,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014. [11] R. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Dover Publications, 1989. [12] I. Maddox, Elements of functional analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1970. [13] M. Fabala et al., Functional analysis and infinite-dimensional geometry. Springer, 2001. [14] C. Kahraman and I. Kaya, “A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 6270–6281, 2010. [15] R. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20(1), pp. 109–119, 2012. [16] B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22(1), pp. 35–45, 2014. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55281 |