Irrelevance of conjectural variation in duopoly under relative profit maximization and consistent conjectures

Satoh, Atsuhiro and Tanaka, Yasuhito (2014): Irrelevance of conjectural variation in duopoly under relative profit maximization and consistent conjectures.

Abstract

We study the equilibrium with quantity setting behavior and price setting behavior of firms in duopoly under relative profit maximization with constant conjectural variations, and show mainly the following results. 1) Conjectural variations of firms are irrelevant to the equilibrium of a duopoly. 2) Quantity setting behavior and price setting behavior are equivalent with any conjectural variation of each firm. 3) Any pair of conjectural variations of firms which satisfies some relation is consistent. In particular, if firms have the same cost functions or the cost functions are linear, and both firms determine the outputs or both firms determine the prices, any conjectural variations which are common to both firms are consistent. Therefore, there are multiple consistent conjectures.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: duopoly, relative profit maximization, conjectural variation, consistent conjecture
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

References

Boyer, M. and M. Moreaux (1983), ``Consistent versus non-consistent conjectures in duopoly theory: some examples'', Journal of Industrial Economics 32, 97-110.

Bresnahan, T. (1981), ``Duopoly models with consistent conjectures'', American Economic Review 71, 934-945.

Bresnahan, T. (1981) ,``Existence of Consistent Conjectures: Reply'', American Economic Review 73, 457-458.

Gibbons, R and K. J. Murphy (1990), ``Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers'', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 30S-51S.

Lu, Y. (2011), ``The relative-profit-maximization objective of private firms and endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly'', The Singapore Economic Review, 56, 203-213.

Kamien, M. Y. and N, Schwartz (1983), ``Conjectural variations'', Canadian Economic Journal, 16, 191-211.

Klemperer, P. D. and M. A. Meyer (1988), ``Consistent conjectures equilibria: A reformulation showing non-uniqueness'', Economics Letters, 27, 111-115.

Matsumura, T., N. Matsushima and S. Cato (2013), ``Competitiveness and R\&D competition revisited'' Economic Modeling, 31, 541-547.

Miller, N. H. and A. I. Pazgal (2001), ``The equivalence of price and quantity competition with delegation'', Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 284-301.

Perry, M. (1982), ``Oligopoly and consistent conjectural variations'', Bell Journal of Economics 13, 197-205.

Robson, A. (1983), ``Existence of Consistent Conjectures: Comment'', American Economic Review 73, 454-456.

Schaffer, M.E. (1989), ``Are profit maximizers the best survivors?'', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12, 29-45.

Tanaka, Y. (1985), ``Consistent conjectures in free entry oligopoly'', Economics Letters, 17, 15-18.

Tanaka, Y. (1988), ``On multiplicity of consistent conjectures in free entry oligopoly'', Economics Letters, 28, 109-115.

Tanaka, Y. (2013), ``Equivalence of Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in differentiated duopoly under relative profit maximization with linear demand'', Economics Bulletin, 33, 1479-1486.

Vega-Redondo, F. (1997), ``The evolution of Walrasian behavior'', Econometrica 65, 375-384.