Huo, Dong and Motohashi, Kazuyuki (2014): Dilemma in Individual Collaboration for Invention: Should We be Similar or Diverse in Knowledge? Published in:
Preview |
PDF
papers_140220.pdf Download (389kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study integrates theories relevant to collaborative knowledge creation and provides evidence to discover effects of knowledge diversity on collaborative knowledge creation. The analysis uses a sample comprising 38,500 granted U.S. utility patents involving two collaborating inventors, from application year 1991 to 2005. Interindividual knowledge diversity is thought to affect collaborative knowledge creation in three dimensions: increasing probability of excellent ideas, increasing probability of disagreements, and lowering knowledge assimilation. Furthermore, these impacts are conditional on two proposed moderators: technology scope and affiliation scope. Empirical evidence supports the positive effect of knowledge diversity weakening as the scope of technology broadens. The effect also differs depending upon whether the collaboration occurs between organizations, within one organization, or outside any organization.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Dilemma in Individual Collaboration for Invention: Should We be Similar or Diverse in Knowledge? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | invention, collaboration, knowledge diversity, knowledge quality, technology scope, affiliation scope |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 56185 |
Depositing User: | Professor Kazuyuki Motohashi |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jul 2014 03:33 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 07:11 |
References: | Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: Sage Publications, Inc. Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. 1991. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3): 251-259. Anderson, J. R., Farrell, R., & Sauers, R. 1984. Learning to program in LISP. Cognitive Science, 8(2): 87-129. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4): 571-582. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173. Basalla, G. 1988. The evolution of technology: Cambridge Univ Pr. Benjamin, B. A., & Podolny, J. M. 1999. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 563-589. Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. 1981. Theories of learning: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Calloway, J. 2007. Work like you're showing off: the joy, jazz, and kick of being better tomorrow than you were today: Wiley. Campbell, D. T. 1960. Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6): 380. Clark, H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1): 1-39. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. 2002. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. Psycholinguistics: Critical Concepts in Psychology: 414. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386-405. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly: 128-152. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. 1987. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3): 497-509. Dixon, N. M. 2000. Common knowledge: how companies thrive by sharing what they know: Harvard Business Press. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science: 117-132. Glaser, R. 1984. Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2): 93-104. Gloor, P. A. 2006. Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks: Oxford University Press, USA. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122. Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 371-385. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8): 1365-1379. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 8498. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. 2003. An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10): 952-965. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3): 511-515. Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA. Huo, D., & Motohashi, K. 2014. When category-based indices encounter non-independent categories: Solving the taxonomy issue in resource-based empirical studies. IAM Discussion Paper Series, No.30 Ingram, P., & Baum, J. A. C. 1997. Opportunity and constraint: organizations' learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(s 1): 75-98. Jackson, S. E. 1992. Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In Stephen Worchel, Wendy Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group Process and Productivity: 138-173. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Romer, P. M. 2005. Patents, citations, and innovations: a window on the knowledge economy: The MIT Press. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 741-763. Judge, G. G. 1985. The Theory and practice of econometrics: Wiley. Keller, R. T. 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 547-559. Kneser, C., & Ploetzner, R. 2001. Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 11(1): 53-83. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495): 441-465. Lerner, J. 1994. The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics 25(2): 319-333. Millonas, M. M. 1994. Swarms, phase transitions and collective intelligence. In C. Langton (Ed.), Artificial Life III: Addison-Wesley. Morris, D., & Hergert, M. 1987. Trends in international collaborative agreements. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(2): 15-21. Mowery, D. C. 1989. Collaborative ventures between US and foreign manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 18(1): 19-32. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77-91. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. 1991. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1): 3-23. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science: 14-37. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford University Press, USA. Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3): 635-652. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697-713. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1997. The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2): 141-156. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 1-28. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review. Pirolli, P. L., & Anderson, J. R. 1985. The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 39(2): 240-272. Poincaré, H. 1956. Mathematical creation. The World of Mathematics, 4: 2041-2050. Polyani, M. 1966. The tacit dimension: Doubleday New York. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116-145. Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. 2006. The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Organization Science, 17(1): 101-117. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. 2005. University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy, 34(3): 305-320. Rumelt, R. P. 1991. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3): 167-185. Sakakibara, M. 1997. Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: an empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1): 143-164. Sampson, R. C. 2007. R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 364-386. Schmalensee, R. 1985. Do markets differ much? The American Economic Review, 75(3): 341-351. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: Harvard University Press. Shenkar, O., & Li, J. 1999. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organization Science: 134-143. Silverman, B. S. 1999. Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science, 45(8): 1109-1124. Simonton, D. K. 1999a. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: is the creative process darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4): 309-328. Simonton, D. K. 1999b. Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity: Oxford University Press, USA. Singh, J., & Fleming, L. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1): 41-56. Skilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. 2010. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 118-134. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly: 501-524. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. 1994. The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2): 503-530. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly: 685-718. Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. 1994. Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2): 133-141. Torvik, V. I., Weeber, M., Swanson, D. R., & Smalheiser, N. R. 2005. A probabilistic similarity metric for Medline records: a model for author name disambiguation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2): 140-158. Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics: 172-187. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. 2005. Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2): 447-504. Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2): 331-360. Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs, 26(1): 2-80. Williamson, O. E. 1973. Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. The American Economic Review, 63(2): 316-325. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827): 1036-1039. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56185 |