When Category-based Indices Encounter Non-independent Categories: Solving the Taxonomy Issue in Resource-based Empirical Studies

Huo, Dong and Motohashi, Kazuyuki (2013): When Category-based Indices Encounter Non-independent Categories: Solving the Taxonomy Issue in Resource-based Empirical Studies. Published in:

Abstract

Category-based measures such as the cosine index, Herfindahl index, entropy index, Euclidean distance, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient are widely applied in resource-based studies. However, when adopting these indices in empirical studies with respect to the categories of industry, technology, or knowledge, the inherent relatedness between the categories gives rise to a taxonomy issue, as the categories are not naturally inter-independent (as they are supposed to be in the application of the original indices) owing to inaccuracies in classification or categorization. Therefore, category-based indices may fail to produce a valid measurement, and this unmeasured relatedness can result in endogeneity in empirical analyses. To solve this issue, this study proposes new indices that can harness the relatedness information of categories. An example of mathematical constructive proof for the cosine index is given, and the development process provides a rigorous solution framework. In addition, this study thoroughly examines validity such as content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and criterion-related validity. The results reveal that this approach performs as expected in empirical analyses. Finally, the mathematical interpretation and generality of this approach for other category-based indices such as the Herfindahl index, entropy index, Euclidean distance, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient are discussed. Interestingly, other proposed measures from existing literature, such as the concentric index, can also be incorporated into this solution framework.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: measurement, taxonomy, category, diversity, relatedness, validity, metric
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure: Free Press (New York).

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1): 69–87.

Bryce, D. J., & Winter, S. G. 2009. A general interindustry relatedness index. Management Science, 55(9): 1570–1585.

Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 875–893.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2): 81.

Caves, R. E., Porter, M. E., & Spence, A. M. 1980. Competition in the open economy: A model applied to Canada: Harvard University Press (Cambridge, Mass.).

Chatterjee, S. 1990a. Excess resources, utilization costs, and mode or entry. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 780–800.

Chatterjee, S. 1990b. The gains to acquiring firms: The related principle revisited. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings.

Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 33–48.

Corrocher, N., Malerba, F., & Montobbio, F. 2007. Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field. Research Policy, 36(3): 418–432.

Cotropia, C. A., Lemley, M. A., & Sampat, B. 2013. Do applicant patent citations matter? Research Policy, 42(4): 844–854.

Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3): 297–334.

Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1107–1123.

Engelsman, E. C., & van Raan, A. F. J. 1991. Mapping of technology: A first exploration of knowledge diffusion amongst fields of technology, Report to the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs (1991) published in the Policy Studies on Technology and Economy (BTE) Series, Nr. 15 (ISSN 0923–3164), The Hague.

Fasham, M. J. R. 1977. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology, 58(3): 551–561.

Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. 2002. Understanding acquisition performance: the role of transfer effects. Organization Science, 13(1): 36–47.

Garcia-Vega, M. 2006. Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2): 230–246.

Gibbs, J. P., & Martin, W. T. 1962. Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: International patterns. American Sociological Review, 27(5): 667–677.

Givens, W. 1958. Computation of plain unitary rotations transforming a general matrix to triangular form. Journal of the Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, 6(1): 26–50.

Gower, J. C. 1967. Multivariate analysis and multidimensional geometry. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 17(1): 13–28.

Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. 2007. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1199–1228.

Herfindahl, O. C. 1950. Concentration in the steel industry. Columbia University.

Hirschman, A. O. 1964. The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5): 761–762.

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. 1993. Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 215–235.

Householder, A. S. 1958. Unitary triangularization of a nonsymmetric matrix. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 5(4): 339–342.

Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. 1991. Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5): 675.

Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. The American Economic Review, 76(5): 984–1001.

King, G., & Zeng, L. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2): 137–163.

Lanjouw, J. O., & Mark Schankerman. 2004. Protecting intellectual property rights: are small firms handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1): 45–74.

Lerner, J. 1994. The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The Rand Journal of Economics: 319–333.

Lien, L. B., & Klein, P. G. 2006. Relatedness and acquirer performance. Advances in Mergers & Acquisitions, 5: 9–23.

Lubatkin, M., & Rogers, R. C. 1989. Research notes. Diversification, systematic risk, and shareholder return: a capital market extension of Rumelt’s 1974 study. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 454–465.

Mahalanobis, P. C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences (Calcutta), 2: 49–55.

Miner, A. S., Haunschild, P. R., & Schwab, A. 2003. Experience and convergence: Curiosities and speculation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4): 789–813.

Montgomery, C. A. 1985. Product-market diversification and market power. Academy of management journal, 28(4): 789–798.

Montgomery, C. A., & Wernerfelt, B. 1988. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. The Rand Journal of Economics: 623–632.

Neffke, F., & Henning, M. 2008. Revealed relatedness: Mapping industry space. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 8.

Neffke, F., & Henning, M. 2012. Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal: 34(3): 297–316.

Norton, E., & Tenenbaum, B. H. 1993. Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5): 431–442.

Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. 2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 155–174.

Pearson, K. 1901. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11): 559–572.

Petruzzelli, A. M. 2011. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7): 309–319.

Putnam, R. D. 2007. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2): 137–174.

Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3): 492–507.

Reyment, R. A., & Jöreskog, K. 1996. Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences: Cambridge University Press.

Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. F. 1995. A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4): 277–299.

Rumelt, R. P. 1974. Strategy, structure, and economic performance: Harvard Business School Press.

Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 359–369.

Sampat, B. 2012. Examiner Citation Data. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/18735 UNF:5:mKUxLoeuskOler9Lq8l7cw== Bhaven Sampat [Distributor] V2 [Version].

Sampson, R. C. 2007. R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE, 50(2): 364–386.

Sayili, A. 1960. Thabit ibn Qurra’s generalization of the Pythagorean theorem. Isis, 51(1): 35–37.

Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., & Frietsch, R. 2003. Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research: 1.

Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148).

Stigler, G. J. 1983. The organization of industry: University of Chicago Press.

Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 179–196.

Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. 1994. Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1): 1–30.

Trefethen, L. N., & Bau III, D. 1997. Numerical linear algebra: Society for Industrial Mathematics. Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. 2005. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal: 532–547.

Vaughn, M. T. 2008. Introduction to mathematical physics: John Wiley & Sons. Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. H. 1986. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review: 71–87.

Wernerfelt, B., & Montgomery, C. A. 1988. Tobin’s q and the importance of focus in firm performance. The American Economic Review, 78(1): 246–250.

Wrigley, L. 1970. Divisional autonomy and diversification. Harvard University.