Swinand, Gregory P and O'Mahoney, Amy (2014): Detecting abnormalities in the Brent crude oil commodities and derivatives pricing complex.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56252.pdf Download (878kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recent rapidly rising and volatile energy commodities prices and financial price manipulation scandals have brought the pricing mechanisms of crude oil derivatives to the fore of both popular press and policy initiatives. Among the most important of such commodities is Brent Crude. Brent Crude and its complex of derivative products make Brent Crude potentially more opaque and thus susceptible to price manipulation than other commodities. In spite of the importance of Brent to the world economy and world energy prices, and its complex of derivative pricing, relatively little work has been done to explore the potential for, and evidence of, price manipulation in the Brent Crude complex. This paper seeks to address this lack by proposing a method to test whether price squeezes have occurred in Brent Crude. This paper builds on previous work which proposed an a priori test for evidence of manipulation and the theory of storage. Previous work (Barrera-Rey and Seymour 1996) posited that the very close-to-delivery end of the forward curve for Brent should not be simultaneously in contango and backwardation, while other work (Geman and Smith 2012) proposed using an econometric prediction and a model based on the theory of storage to detect manipulation in commodity markets. Our work builds on these approaches by developing a more detailed model of calendar spreads in the Brent Crude complex. In Brent, a particular area of potential manipulation is from the relatively illiquid and more opaque physical OTC forward market (where prices are ‘assessed’ by Platts during a short ‘window’ of time) and the more liquid ICE futures market. Our model relates prompt ICE futures calendar spreads to prompt-over-dated OTC forward spreads. The model then tests whether the a priori indicators of manipulation as suggested by Barrera-Rey and Seymour are statistically consistent with the process which drives spreads historically. We find that in most all cases, the indicated period of manipulation is statistically different. We further investigate whether other factors, such as liquidity (volume and open interest) or world oil market conditions (using WTI spreads) or other forward market conditions could be driving our results. The statistical difference is found to be invariant to the inclusion of these other explanatory variables. We conclude that the evidence is consistent with the hypothesis of price manipulation and that the test provides a model and method for detecting such cases.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Detecting abnormalities in the Brent crude oil commodities and derivatives pricing complex |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | commodities, econometrics, market manipulation |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General |
Item ID: | 56252 |
Depositing User: | Dr Amy O'Mahoney |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2014 03:41 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 20:04 |
References: | Barrera-Rey, F. and Seymour A. (1996) The Brent Contract for Differences (CFD): A Study of an Oil Trading Instrument, its Market and its Influence on the Behaviour of Oil Prices. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Bloomberg, (2012). “Dimon Faces Image ‘Nightmare’ With Energy Probe at JPM”. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-03/jpmorgan-probed-over-potential-power-market-manipulation-1-.html CFTC, (2008). “CFTC Announces Multiple Energy Market Initiatives". CFTC. Release: 5503-08. May 29, 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-06-01. Retrieved 2008-06-11. CFTC (2008). “CFTC in talks to plug the 'London loophole'". The Financial Times. 2008-06-10. Retrieved 2008-06-11. CFTC (2012). CFTC scores 'milestone' win on oil-price manipulation-Chicago Tribune, 20 April 2012. Econbrowser (2011) “Oil price manipulation”. http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2011/05/oil_price_manip.html Geman, H. and Smith, W. (2012). “Theory of Storage, Inventory and Volatility in the LME Base Metals,” Forthcoming. Resources Policy. Horsnell, P. and Mabro, R. (1993). “Oil Markets and Prices,” Oxford University Press for the OxfordInstitute for Energy Studies, Oxford. Kaldor, N. (1939). “Speculation and Economic Stability” The Review of Economic Studies 7, 1{27). Kemp, J. (2012). “Britain’s FSA should open investigation into Brent”. Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/19/us-column-kemp-oil-brent-idUSBRE86I14D20120719. Mufson, S. (2008-05-30). "Probe of Crude Oil Trading Disclosed". Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-06-11. Pirrong, C. (2012). Commodity Price Dynamics: A Structural Approach, Bauer College of Business University of Houston; online version Reuters, (2012). “Oil price manipulation seldom prosecuted under Obama”. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/20/financial-regulation-manipulation-idUSL2E8FJ32P20120420 Reuters, (2012). “EU may criminalise commodities price distortion.” Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:58pm IST, Barbara Lewis; www.reuters.com Telser, L.G. (1958). “Futures Trading and the Storage of Cotton and Wheat," Journal of Political Economy 66, 133-144. White House (2012). “Fact Sheet: Increasing Oversight and Cracking Down on Manipulation in Oil Markets”. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/17/fact-sheet-increasing-oversight-and-cracking-down-manipulation-oil-market Williams, J. and B. Wright (1991) Storage and Commodity Markets. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Working, H., 1927. Forecasting the Price of Wheat. J. of Farm Econ. 9 (3), 273–287. Working, H. 1933. Price Relations between July and September Wheat Futures at Chicago Since 1885. Wheat Stud. of the Food Res. Inst. 9 (6). Working, H. 1934. Price Relations Between May and New-Crop Wheat Futures at Chicago Since 1885. Wheat Stud. of the Food Res. Inst. 10 (5). Working, H. (1948). “Theory of the Inverse Carrying Charge in Futures Markets" Journal of Farm Economics 30, 1-28. Working, H. (1949). “The Theory of the Price of Storage," American Economic Review 39, 1254-1262. Working, H., 1949. ‘The Theory of Price of Storage’. The Am. Econ. Rev. 39 (6), 1254–1262. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56252 |