Mitchell, David and Hunsader, Kenneth and Parker, Scott (2011): A Futures Trading Experiment: An Active Classroom Approach to Learning. Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance Education , Vol. 1, No. 10 (2011): pp. 10-27.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56496.pdf Download (53kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents a classroom experiment where students participate in a simulated futures market. This experiment can be run in about an hour and allows students to interact, negotiate, try different strategies, see how their accounts are closed, and observe how spot and futures markets relate. After participating in the futures experiment, students participate in a debriefing session to help them solidify their learning. This experiment can be successfully adopted in undergraduate finance education
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Futures Trading Experiment: An Active Classroom Approach to Learning |
English Title: | A Futures Trading Experiment: An Active Classroom Approach to Learning |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | futures markets, closing, spot markets |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G13 - Contingent Pricing ; Futures Pricing |
Item ID: | 56496 |
Depositing User: | david mitchell |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jun 2014 05:58 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 13:47 |
References: | Becker, William E., Michael Watts, and Suzanne R Becker (eds.). 2006. Teaching Economics: More Alternatives to Chalk and Talk. North Hampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Bergstrom, Theodore, and John H. Miller. 1997. Experiments with Economic Principles. New York:McGraw Hill. Brauer, Jurgen, and Greg Delemeester. 2001. “Games Economists Play: A Survey of Non-computerized Classroom-games for College Economics.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (2): 221-36. Emerson, Tish L.N. and Beck A. Taylor. 2004. “Comparing Student Achievement across Experimental and Lecture-oriented Sections of a Principles of Microeconomics Course.” Southern Economic Journal, 70(3):672-693. Ewing, Bradley T., Jamie B. Kruse, and Mark A. Thompson. 2004. “Money Demand and Risk: A Classroom Experiment.” Journal of Economic Education, 35(3): 243-50. Haigh, Michael S. 2005. “Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion: An Experimental Analysis,” The Journal of Finance, 60(1): 523-534. Hazlett, Denise. 2003. “A Search-theoretic Classroom Experiment with Money.” International Review of Economics Education , 2(1): 80-90. ______. 2004. “A Classroom Unemployment Compensation Experiment.” Southern Economic Journal ,70(3): 694- 704. Hazlett, Denise, and Jeela Ganje. 1999. “An Experiment with Official and Parallel Foreign Exchange Markets in a Developing Country.” Journal of Economic Education, 30(4): 392-401. Holt, Charles A. 1999. “Teaching Economics with Classroom Experiments: A Symposium.” Southern Economic Journal , 65(3): 603-610. _____. 2006. Webgames and Strategy: Recipes for Interactive Learning. New York: Addison-Wesley.Hull, Robert M., Sungkyu Kwak, and Rosemary L. Walker. 2008. “Collusion and Stock Offerings: AClassroom Exercise for Economics and Finance Classes.” Journal of Economics and Finance Education,7(1): 52-65. Jones, Charles P. 2007. Investments. (10 th ed.) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc. Manzo, Anthony V., and Ula Manzo. 1997. Content Area Literacy: Interactive Teaching for Active Learning 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Mitchell, David, Robert Rebelein, Patricia H.H. Schneider, Nicole Simpson, and Eric O. Fisher. 2009. “AClassroom Experiment on Exchange Rate Determination with Purchasing Power Parity.” Journal of Economic Education, 40(2): 150 - 165 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56496 |