Matsumura, Toshihiro and Ogawa, Akira (2014): Inefficient but robust public leadership.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56539.pdf Download (118kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigate endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly in a differentiated product market. We find that private leadership is better than public leadership from a social welfare perspective if the private firm is domestic, regardless of the degree of product differentiation. Nevertheless, the public leadership equilibrium is risk-dominant, and it is thus robust if the degree of product differentiation is high. We also find that regardless of the degree of product differentiation, the public leadership equilibrium is risk-dominant if the private firm is foreign. These results may explain the recent revival of public financial institutions in Japan.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Inefficient but robust public leadership. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | public financial institutions, differentiated products, risk dominance, Stackelberg |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 56539 |
Depositing User: | Dr Toshihiro Matsumura |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2014 06:17 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 05:42 |
References: | Amir, R. and Stepanova, A. (2006). Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(1), 1–20. B´arcena-Ruiz, J. C. (2007). Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition. Journal of Economics, 91(3), 263–72. B´arcena-Ruiz, J. C. and Garz´on, M. B. (2005a). Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1), 247–67. B´arcena-Ruiz, J. C. and Garz´on, M. B. (2005b). International trade and strategic privatization. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 502–13. B´arcena-Ruiz, J. C. and Sedano, M. (2011). Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: weighted welfare and price competition. Japanese Economic Review, 62(4), 485–503. Bose, A., Pal, D., and Sappington, D. E. M. (2013). The impact of public ownership in the lending sector. forthcoming in Canadian Journal of Economics. Capuano, C. and De Feo, G. (2010). Privatization in oligopoly: the impact of the shadow cost of public funds. Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti, 15(2), 175–208. Corneo, G, and Jeanne, O. (1994). Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 33, 73–90. Dixit, A. K. (1979). A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 20–32. Fjell, K. and Pal, D. (1996). A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(3), 737–43. Harsanyi, J. C. and Selten, R. (1988). A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Hamilton, J. H. and Slutsky, S. M. (1990). Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior, 2(1), 29–46. Hirata, D. and Matsumura, T. (2011). Price leadership in a homogeneous product market. Journal of Economics, 104(3), 199–217. Heywood, J. S, and Ye, G. (2009a). Mixed oligopoly, sequential entry, and spatial price discrimination. Economic Inquiry, 47(3), 589–97. Heywood, J. S, and Ye, G. (2009b). Mixed oligopoly and spatial price discrimination with foreign firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(5), 592–601. Horiuchi, A, and Sui, Q. Y. (1993). Influence of the Japan Development Bank loans on corporate investment behavior. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 7(4), 441–65. Ino, H. and Matsumura, T. (2010). What role should public enterprises play in free-entry markets? Journal of Economics, 101(3), 213–30. Ishida, J. and Matsushima, N. (2009). Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining?: a mixed-duopoly approach. Journal of Public Economics, 93(3-4), 634–46. Lin, M. H. and Matsumura, T. (2012). Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics, 107(1), 71–80. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473–83. Matsumura, T. (2003a). Endogenous role in mixed markets: a two-production period model. Southern Economic Journal, 70(2), 403–13. Matsumura, T. (2003b). Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(3), 275–87. Matsumura, T. and Matsushima, N. (2004). Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach. Economica 71, 671–88. Matsumura, T. and Ogawa, A. (2009). Payoff dominance and risk dominance in the observable delay game: a note. Journal of Economics, 97(3), 265–72. Matsumura, T. and Ogawa, A. (2010). On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly. Australian Economic Papers, 49(2), 149–60. Matsumura, T. and Tomaru, Y. (2013). Mixed duopoly, privatization, and subsidization with excess burden of taxation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(2), 526–54. Megginson, W. and Netter, J. (2001). From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–89. Ono, Y. (1978). The equilibrium of duopoly in a market of homogeneous goods. Economica, 45, 287–95. Ono, Y. (1982). Price leadership: a theoretical analysis. Economica, 49, 11–20. Pal, D. (1991). Cournot duopoly with two production periods and cost differentials. Journal of Economic Theory, 55(2), 441–8. Pal, D. (1998). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters, 61(2), 181–5. Pal, D. and White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal, 65(2), 264–81. Saloner, G. (1987). Cournot duopoly with two production periods. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 183–7. Tomaru, Y. and Kiyono, K. (2010). Endogenous timing in mixed duopoly with increasing marginal costs. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 166(4), 591–613. Tomaru, Y. and Saito, M. (2010). Mixed duopoly, privatization and subsidization in an endogenous timing framework. Manchester School, 78(1), 41–59. van Damme, E. and Hurkens, S. (2004). Endogenous price leadership. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), 404–20. Wang L. F. S. and Lee, J. Y. (2013). Foreign penetration and undesirable competition. Economic Modelling, 30(1), 729–32. Wang, L. F. S. and Mukherjee, A. (2012). Undesirable competition. Economics Letters, 114(2), 175–7. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56539 |