Does international trade improve environmental efficiency? An application of a super slacks-based measurement of efficiency

Honma, Satoshi (2014): Does international trade improve environmental efficiency? An application of a super slacks-based measurement of efficiency.

Abstract

This study analyzes environmental efficiency, and its determinants, for 98 countries in terms of four typical air pollutants—SO2, NOx, particulate matter 10 micrometers or less in diameter (PM10), and CO2—for the period 1970–2008. For this purpose, I propose a super slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (DEA) model with undesirable outputs—which has higher discriminating power than previous DEA efficiency indices, modifying the ones proposed in preceding articles. Furthermore, I analyze the determinants of environmental efficiency in association with the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. The panel regression results reveal that there is no Kuznets-type relationship between environmental efficiency and per-capita income. The impact of trade on environmental efficiency depends on relative per-capita income and capital–labor ratio, i.e., the higher the relative income and the lower the capital–labor ratio, the higher the environmental efficiency. Overall, the elasticities of trade openness for NOx, PM10, and CO2 are significantly negative for an average country in the sample.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Environmental efficiency; Environmental Kuznets curve; Pollution haven hypothesis; Super efficiency
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

Chung YH, Fare R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240

Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2003) Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manage 46:363–383

Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2nd edn.

Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev Econ and Stat 87(1):85–91

Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environment impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber, PM (ed) The Mexican-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2009) Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecol Econ 68(7):2168–2176

Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2011) Kuznets curve and environmental performance: Evidence from China. MPRA paper No.34312.

Honma, S (2014) Environmental and economic efficiencies in the Asia-Pacific region. J Asia-Pacific Bus. 15(2):122–135

Kijima M, Nishide K, Ohyama A (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey. J Econ Dyn Control 34(7):1187–1201

Li H, Fang K, Yang W, Wang D, Hong X (2013) Regional environmental efficiency evaluation in China: Analysis based on the super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Math Comput Model 58(5–6):1018–1031

Managi S, Jena PR (2008) Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecol Econ 65(2):432–440

Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363

Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martinez E, Hernandez-Sancho F (2005) Directional distance functions and environmental regulation. Resour Energ Econ 27(2):131–142

Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence. Background Paper for the World Development Report. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439

Taskin F, Zaim O (2001) The role for international trade on environmental efficiency: A DEA approach. Econ Model 18(1):1–17

Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

Tone K (2002) A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 143(1):32–41

Tone K (2004) Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. Oper Res Soc Japan 44–45

Wei C, Jinlan NI, Limin DU (2012) Reginal allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China. China Econ Rev 23(3):552–565

Zaim O, Taskin F (2000) A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: An application on OECD countries. Environ Res Econ 17(1):21–36

Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecol Econ 60(1):111–118

Zhou P, Poh KL, Ang BW (2007) A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur J Oper Res 178(1):1–9