Cooperation between Russian research organizations and industrial companies: factors and problems

Simachev, Yuri and Kuzyk, Mikhail and Feygina, Vera (2014): Cooperation between Russian research organizations and industrial companies: factors and problems.

Abstract

The study is focused on the cooperation of Russian companies with research organizations in implementing R&D projects during technological innovation. Taking into account behavioral changes, authors carry out a micro-level analysis based on empirical data of executive survey of over 600 Russian industrial firms (2011—2012) and about 350 research organizations and universities (2012). The authors emphasize the key factors of firms’ demand for outsourcing R&D reveal the main barriers to the development of university-industry cooperation and their particularities for different cooperation actors. The analysis shows that there is a positive relation between the size of a company and R&D outsourcing. As for the factor of age, the highest cooperation activity of Russian firms is observed among enterprises founded over 20 years ago. As far as concernes cooperation activity of research organizations, large ones are significantly more likely to cooperate with business. A common prerequisite for research organizations' R&D cooperation with business is sufficient academic ranking. Business and science evaluate differently various obstacles to effective cooperation. For firms, the main problems are the inflated costs of national R&Ds, insufficient research organizations’ orientation at company needs, and low quality of developments. As for representatives of research organizations, they mention as barriers primarily the lack of companies' receptivity to innovation and inadequate information about promising developments. Businesses are more optimistic about cooperation with science if they already have a relevant experience of interaction. In the case of research organizations we observe a different pattern: most problems seem more significant to organizations conducting R&D in business interests.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: innovations; university-industry cooperation; barriers to research and development; firm behavior
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L20 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Antonelli C., Crespi F. (2011). Matthew Effects and R&D Subsidies: Knowledge Cumulability in High-tech and Low-tech Industries // University Roma Tre Working Paper. No 11/2011.

Arundel A, Geuna A. (2004). Proximity and the Use of Public Science by Innovative European Firms // Economics of Innovation and New Technologies Vol. 13, No 6. P. 559—580.

Bach L., Mats M. (2005). From Economic Foundations to S&T Policy Tools: A Comparative Analysis of the Dominant Paradigms // Innovation Policy in a Knowledge—Based Economy: Theory and Practice / M. Matt, P. Llerena (eds). Heidelberg: Springer.

Barnes T., Pashby I., Gibbons A. (2002). Effective University — Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of collaborative R&D Projects // European Management Journal. Vol. 20, No 3. P. 272—285.

Bjerregaard T. (2009). Universities-Industry Collaboration Strategies: A Micro-Level Perspective // European Journal Of Innovation Management. Vol. 12, No 2. P. 161—176.

Borrell-Damian L. (2009). Collaborative Doctoral Education: University-Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge Exchange // Doc CAREERS Project. EUA Publications.

Bowie N. (1994). University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Casey J. (2004). Developing Harmonious University-industry Partnership // University of Dayton Law Review. Vol 30, No 2. P. 245—263.

Cohen W., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. (2002). Links and Impacts: the Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D // Management Science. Vol. 48, No 1. P. 1—23.

D’Este P., Perkmann M. (2011). Why do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36, No 3. P. 316—339.

Dezhina I. G., Kiseleva V. V. (2008). State, Science, and Business in Russian Innovation System. Moscow: Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ. (in Russian).

Dezhina I. G., Simachev Yu. V. (2013). Matching Grants for Stimulating Partnerships Between Companies and Universities in Innovation Aria: Initial Effects in Russia // Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii. Vol. 3, No 19. P. 99—122. (in Russian).

Edquist C. (1997). System of Innovation Approaches — Their Emergence and Characteristics // System of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions And Organizations / C. Edquist (ed.). L.: Pinter. P. 1—35.

Ervin D., Lomax T., Buccola S., Kim K., Minor E., Yang H., Glenna L., Jaeger E., Biscotti D., Armbruster W., Clancy K., Lacy W., Welsh R., Xia Y. (2002). University-Industry Relationship: Framing the Issues for Academic Research in Agricultural Biotechnology / Report of Workshop “University- Industry Relationships and the Public Good: Framing the Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology”, November 19—20. http://www.agri-biotech.pdx.edu/Pew_UIRreport-FINAL%20use%20this.pdf.

Fontana R., Geuna A., Matt M. (2005). Factors Affecting University-Industry R&D Collaboration: The importance of screening and signaling // Document de travail No 2005-07. Strasburg.

Freitas I.M.B, Verspagen B. (2009). The Motivations, Organization and Outcomes of University-Industry Interaction in the Netherlands // UNU-MERIT Working Papers. No 2009-011.

Ghani N. (1991). European collaborative research projects // Engeneering Management Journal. Vol. 1, No 2. P. 63—70.

Goldberg I., Gobbard G., Racin J. (2011). Igniting Innovations: Rethinking the Role of Government in Emerging Europe and Central Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Hall B. H., Link A. N., Scott J. T. (2001). Universities as Research Partners // NBER Working Papers. No 7643.

Kaymaz K., Eryigit K. Y. (2011). Determining Factors Hindering University-IndustryCollaboration: An Analysis from the Perspective of Academicians in the Context of Entrepreneurial Science Paradigm // International Journal of Social Inquiry. Vol. 4, No 1. P. 85—213.

Kodcharat Ya., Chaikeaw A. (2012). University and Industrial Sector Collaboration: the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer // International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 3, No 23. P. 130—137.

Laursen K., Salter A. (2004). Searching High and Low: What Types of Firms use Universities as a Source of Innovation? // Research Policy. Vol. 33, No 8. P. 1201—1215.

Lee Y.S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 25. P. 111-133.

Liu W. H. (2009). Academia-Industry Linkages and the Role of Active Innovation Policies — Firm-level Evidence in Hong Kong // Kiel Working Papers. No 1577.

Mohnen P., Hoareau C. (2003). What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links With Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from CIS 2 // Managerial & Decision Economics. Vol. 24, No 2/3. P. 133—146.

Metcalfe J. S. (1994). Evolutionary Economics and Public Policy // Economic Journal Vol. 104, No 425. P. 931—944.

Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U. (1998). Science-based Technologies University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields // Research Policy. Vol. 27, No 8. P. 835—852.

OECD (2001). Innovative Networks: Co-operation Innovation Systems.

OECD (2011). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Russian Federation 2011.

OECD (2013). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.

Ortega-Argiles R., Piva M., Potters L., Vivarelli M.(2009). Is Corporate R&D Investment in Hightech Sectors more Efficient? Some Guidelines for European Research Policy // IPTS Working Papers. No 09/2009 / Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.

Pavitt K. (1980). The Social Shaping of the National Science Base // Research policy. Vol. 27, No 8. P. 793—805.

Schartinger D., Schibany A., Gassler H. (2001). Interactive Relations between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria // Journal of Technology Transfer.Vol. 26, No 3. P. 255—269.

Schibany A., Jörg L., Polt W. (1999). Towards Realistic Expectations. The Science System as a Contributor to Industrial Innovation. Seibersdorf: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.

Simachev Yu., Kuzyk M., Feygina V. (2014). The Nature of Innovation Channels at the MicroLevel: Evidence from Russian Manufacturing Firms // Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. Vol. 12, No 2. P. 103—123.

Smith K. (1995). Interactions in Knowledge Systems: Foundations, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods // STI-Review. No 16. P. 69—102.

Smorodinskaya N.V. (2011). Triple Helix as a New Matrix of Economic Systems // Innovatsii. No 4. P. 66—78. (in Russian).

Teubal M. (1996). R&D and technology policy in NICs as learning processes // World Development. Vol. 24, No 3. P. 449—460.

Teubal M. (2002). What is the Systems Perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) and How Can We Apply It to Developing and Newly Industrialized Economies? // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol. 12, No 1. P. 233—257.

World Economic Forum (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013—2014: Full Data Edition. Geneva.

Wu V. F.-S. (2000). An Empirical Study of University Industry Research Cooperation — The Case of Taiwan // Workshop of the OECD-NIS Focus Group on Innovation Firm and Networks. Rome. P. 1—15.

Zaichenko S., Kuznetsova T., Roud V. (2014). Features of Interaction Between Russian Enterprises and Research Organizations in the Field of Innovation // Forsait. Vol. 8, No 1. P. 6—22. (in Russian).

Zasimova L. S., Kuznetsov B. V., Kuzyk M. G., Simachev Yu.V., Chulok A. A. (2008). Problems of Switching Industry to Innovation-Driven Path // Scientific report Series. No 201. Moscow: Moscow Public Science Foundation. (in Russian).

Zucker L. G., Darby M. R. (2000). Capturing Technological Opportunity via Japan’s Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms’ Biotech Patents and Products // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 26, No 1/2. P. 37—58.