Motivational structures underlying judicial discretion: An information theoretic investigation

Bhati, Avinash (2009): Motivational structures underlying judicial discretion: An information theoretic investigation.

Abstract

Judicial discretion has rightly been termed a puzzle. Given the several competing concerns that can influence judges when they sanction offenders and the institutional structures that typically constrain their decisions, the task of uncovering the motivational structures underlying judicial discretion has proven very challenging for scholars. This paper develops a behavioral model of federal judges exercising discretion pursuant to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and derives testable implications regarding the amount of prison term they impose on convicted offenders. An information theoretic approach is used to investigate these assertions. The data reveal a host of information about judicial discretion including how various factors affect sanctioning decisions, how variation in case and offender attributes heighten or reduce judicial concerns, how judges juggle various competing concerns while exercising discretion, and how compliance with the guidelines competes with other judicial concerns.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Judicial discretion; utility maximization; information theory; limited discretionary regimes
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K40 - General

References

Abelson, Robert. 1968. “Psychological Implications.” In Theories of Cognitive Consistency, ed. Abelson, Aronson, McGuire, Newcomb, Rosenberg, and Tannenbaum. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Adams, William. 1998. An Analysis of Departures from the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, 1991–1995. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Albonetti, Celesta. 1997. “Sentencing Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Please and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenders 1991–1992.” Law and Society Review, 31(4):789–822.

Anderson, James M., Jeffrey R. Kling, and Kate Stith. 1999. “Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Journal of Law and Economics, 42:271–307.

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Baum, Lawrence. 2007. “Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Exploring the Judicial Mind (University of Virginia Law School) http://faculty.virginia.edu/judging/documents/motivation.lb.pdf (last accessed 10/01/2007)

Becker, Gary. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy, 76(2):169–217.

Becker, Gary. 1993. “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy, 101(3):385–409.

Bushway, Shawn and Anne Morrison Piehl. 2002. “Judging Judicial Discretion: Legal Factors and Racial Discrimination in Sentencing.” Law and Society Review, 35(4):733–764.

Cabranes, Jos´e A. and Kate Stith. 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Cohen, Mark A. 1991. “Explaining Judicial Behavior or What’s ‘Unconstitutional’ about the Sentencing Commission?” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(1):183–199.

Cohen, Mark A. 1992. “The Motives of Judges: Empirical Evidence from Antitrust Sentencing.” International Review of Law and Economics, (12):13–30.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1963. “Judicial Discretion.” The Journal of Philosophy, 60(21):624–638.

Engen, Rodney L. and Randy R. Gainey. 2000. “Modeling the Effects of Legally Relevant and Extralegal Factors Under Sentencing Guidelines: The Rules Have Changed.” Criminology, 38(4):1207–1229.

Engen, Rodney L., Randy R. Gainey, Robert D. Crutchfield, and Joseph G. Weis. 2003. “Discretion and Disparity Under Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Departures and Structured Sentencing Alternatives.” Criminology, 41(1):99–130.

Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual. 2005. Washington, DC: West Publishing Company.

Golan, Amos, George G. Judge, and Douglas Miller. 1996. Maximum Entropy Econometrics: Robust Estimation with Limited Data. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Griswald, David B. 1987. “Deviation from Sentencing Guidelines: The Issue of Unwarranted Disparity.” Journal of Criminal Justice, 15:317–329.

Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Raflinski, and Andrew J. Wistritch. 2001. “Inside the Judicial Mind.” Cornell Law Review, 86:777.

Heckman, James. 1979. “Sample Selection as a Specification Error.” Econometrica, 47:153–161.

Hofer, Paul J., Kevin R. Blackwell, and R. Barry Ruback. 1999. “The effects of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on Inter-judge Sentencing Disparity.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90(1):239–321.

Jaynes, Edwin T. 1957. “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics.” Physics Review, 106:620–630.

Johnson, Brian. 2005. “Contextual Disparities in Guideline Departures: Courtroom Social Context, Guideline Compliance, and Extralegal Disparities in Criminal Sentencing.” Criminology, 43(3):761–796.

Johnson, Brian. 2005. “The Multilevel Context of Criminal Sentencing: Integrating Judge and County Level Influences on Courtroom Decision Making.” Criminology, 44(2):259–298. � Isaacs, Nathan. 1923. “The Limits of Judicial Discretion.” The Yale Law Review, 32(4):339–352.

Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly and Lisa L. Sample. 2001. “Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(2):111–144.

Maxfield, Linda and John Kramer. 1998. Substantial Assistance: An Empirical Yardstick Gauging Equity in Current Federal Policy and Practice. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.

McDonald, Douglas C. and Kenneth E. Carlson. 1993. Sentencing in the Federal Courts: Does Race Matter? The Transition to Sentencing Guidelines, 1986–90. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Mears, Daniel P. 1998. “The Sociology of Sentencing: Reconceptualizing Decisionmaking Processes and Outcomes.” Law and Society Review, 32(3):667–724.

Moore, Michael S. 1987. “The Moral Worth of Retribution.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, ed. Schoeman, F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mustard, David B. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic and Gender Disparity in Sentencing: Evidence from U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics, 44:285–314.

Payne, Abigail. 1997. “Does Inter Judge Disparity Really Matter? An Analysis of Sentencing Reforms in Three Federal District Courts.” International Review of Law and Economics, 17:337–366.

Peterson, Ruth D. and John Hagan. 1984. “Changing Concepts of Race: Towards an Account of Anomalous Findings of Sentencing Research.” American Sociological Review, 49:56–70.

Posner, Richard. 1985. “An Economic Theory of Criminal Law.” Columbia Law Review, 85:1193.

Posner, Richard. 1995a. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Posner, Richard. 1995b. “What Do Judges Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review, 3:1–28.

Posner, Richard. 2003. Economic Analysis of Law. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.

Posner, Richard. 2006. “Review of Steven Shavell’s Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law.” Journal of Economic Literature, 44(2):405–414.

Reuter, Peter and Shawn Bushway. ed. 2007. “Special Issue on Incapacitation” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol 23.

Rhodes, William. 1991. “Federal Criminal Sentencing: Some Measurement Issues with Application to Pre-Guideline Sentencing Disparity.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81(4):1002–1033.

Ryu, Hang K. 1993). “Maximum Entropy Estimation of Density and Regression Functions.” Journal of Econometrics, 56:397–440.

Schauer, Frederick. 2007. “Is There a Psychology of Judging?” Paper presented at the Workshop on Exploring the Judicial Mind (University of Virginia Law School). http://faculty.virginia.edu/judging/documents/psychology.fs.pdf (last accessed 10/01/2007)

Shannon, Claude. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379–423.

Shavell, Steven. 2004. Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.

Spohn, Cassie C. 2000. “Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process.” In Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, Vol.3. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

Spohn, Cassie and David Holleran. 2000. “The Imprisonment Penalty Paid by Young, Unemployed Black and Hispanic Male Offenders.” Criminology, 38(1):281–306.

Steffensmeier, Darrell and Chaster L. Britt. 2001. “Judges’ Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently?” Social Science Quarterly, 82(4): 749–764.

Steffensmeier, Darrell and Stephen DeMuth. 2000. “Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly?” American Sociological Review, 65:705–729.

Steffensmeier, Darrell and Stephen DeMuth. 2001. “Ethnicity and Judges’ Sentencing Decisions: Hispanic-Black-White Comparisons.” Criminology, 39(1):145–178.

Tobin, James. 1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependant Variables.” Econometrica, 26:24–34.

Tonry, Michael. 1987. “Prediction and Classification: Legal and Ethical Issues.” In Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, ed. Gottfredson, Don and Tonry, Michael. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tonry, Michael. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York, NY: Ofxord University Press.

Tonry, Michael. 1999. “The fragmentation of sentencing and corrections in America.” In Sentencing and Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century. Papers from the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections, No. 1. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

United States Sentencing Commission. 2003. Survey of Article III Judges on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( http://www.ussc.gov/judsurv/judsurv.htm )

Ulmer, Jeffrey T. 2000. “The Rules have Changed — So Proceed with Caution: A Comment on Engen and Gainey’s Method for Modeling Sentencing Outcomes Under Guidelines.” Criminology, 38(4): 1231–1243.

Ulmer, Jeffrey T. John Kramer, and Brian Johnson. 2001. “District Matters: An Analysis of Inter-District Variation in Federal Sentencing.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), Atlanta, GA.

von Hirsch, Andrew. 1976. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishment. New York: Hill and Wang.

Weintraub, Benson, and Benedict Kuehne. 2003. “The Feeney Frenzy: A Case Study in Actions and Reactions in the Politics of Sentencing.” Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16(2):114–118.

Wooldredge, John D. 1998. “Analytical Rigor in Studies of Disparity in Criminal Case Processing.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(2):155–179.

Wu, Ximing. 2003. “Calculation of Maximum Entropy Densities with Application to Income Distribution.” Journal of Econometrics, 115:347–354.

Zellner, Arnold and Richard A. Highfield. 1988. “Calculation of Maximum Entropy Distributions and Approximation of Marginal Posterior Distributions.” Journal of Econometrics, 37:195–209.