Morone, Andrea and Morone, Piergiuseppe (2014): The focal point in the Traveller’s Dilemma: An Experimental Study.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_58071.pdf Download (342kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper provides an experimental test of the traveller’s dilemma. Our investigation aims to address the research hypothesis that introducing a reference point à la Schelling (set equal to the Pareto optimal solution) might drive people away from rationality even when the size of the penalty/reward is high. Experimental findings reported in this paper provide answers to this question showing that the reference point did not encourage coordination around the Pareto optimal choice.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The focal point in the Traveller’s Dilemma: An Experimental Study |
English Title: | The focal point in the Traveller’s Dilemma: An Experimental Study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | traveller’s dilemma; focal point; individual decision |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making |
Item ID: | 58071 |
Depositing User: | Andrea Morone |
Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2014 03:42 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:30 |
References: | Basu, K. (1994). “The Traveler’s Dilemma: Paradoxes of Rationality in Game Theory”, American Economic Review, 84(2), 391-395. Basu, K., L. Becchetti and L. Stanca (2011). “Experiments with the traveler's dilemma: welfare, strategic choice and implicit collusion”, Social choice and welfare, 37: 575-595. Becker, T., M. Carter and J. Naeve (2005). “Experts playing the traveler’s dilemma” Department of Economics – working paper Nr. 252/2005, University of Hohenheim, Germany. Bosman, R., and F. van Winden (2002). “Emotional Hazard in a Power-to- Take experiment”, Economic Journal, 112: 147-169. Bosman, R., M. Sutter and F. van Winden (2005). “The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 26: 407-429. Brañas-Garza, P., M.P. Espinosa, P. Rey-Biel (2011). “Travelers’ types”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 78: 25–36. Capra, C.M., J.K. Goeree, R. Gmez and C.A. Holt (1999). “Anomalous behavior in a traveler’s dilemma?” American Economic Review, 89(3): 678-690. Cherry, T.L., P. Frykblom and J.F. Shogren (2002). “Hardnose the Dictator.” American Economic Review, 92:1218-21. Chakravarty, S., E. Dechenaux and J. Roy (2010). “Ill-defined versus Precise Pre-play Communication in the Traveler's Dilemma”, Southern Economic Journal, 77(2): 351-368. Guth, W., and A. Ortmam (2006). “A behavioral approach to distribution and bargaining”, in: Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: foundations and developments, M. Altman (ed.), Armonk, New York. Fischbacher, U. (2007). “z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments” Experimental Economics, 10: 171-178 Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York: Harcourt Brace and Co. Morone, A. and P. Morone (2008). “Guessing Games and People Behaviours: What Can we Learn?”, in: M. Abdellaboui and J.D. Hey (eds.), Advances in Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty, Springer. Morone, A. and P. Morone (2010). “Boundary and interior equilibria: what drives convergence in a p-beauty contest?”, Economics Bulletin, 30(3): 2097-2106. Morone, A., S. Sandri and T. Uske (2008), “On the absorbability of the Guessing Game Theory - A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis”, in: A. Innocenti and P. Sbriglia (eds.), Games, Rationality and Behaviour, Palgrave. Morone, A., and P. Morone (2014), “Individual and group behaviour in the traveler's dilemma: An experimental study”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 1(49): 1-7. Moulin, H. (1986) Game Theory for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: NYU Press. Nagel, R. (1995). “Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study”, American Economic Review, 85(5): 1313-1326. Rubinstein A. (2006). “Dilemmas of an economic theorist.” Econometrica, 74: 865-884 Schelling, T.C. (1980). The strategy of conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/58071 |