Divided Loyalists or Conditional Cooperators? Creating Consensus about Cooperation in Multiple Simultaneous Social Dilemmas

McCarter, Matthew and Samek, Anya and Sheremeta, Roman (2014): Divided Loyalists or Conditional Cooperators? Creating Consensus about Cooperation in Multiple Simultaneous Social Dilemmas. Forthcoming in: Group and Organization Management

Abstract

The current social dilemma literature lacks theoretical consensus regarding how individuals behave when facing multiple simultaneous social dilemmas. The divided-loyalty hypothesis, from organizational theory, predicts that cooperation will decline as individuals experience multiple social dilemmas with different compared to the same group members. The conditional-cooperation hypothesis, from behavioral economics, predicts that cooperation will increase as individuals experience multiple social dilemmas with different compared to the same group members. We employ a laboratory experiment to create consensus between these literatures and find support for the conditional-cooperation hypothesis. The positive effect of interacting with different group members comes from participants having an opportunity to shift their cooperative behavior from the less cooperative to the more cooperative group.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: cooperation, conditional cooperation, defection, loyalty, experiments, public goods, social dilemmas
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior

References

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (1998). A social dilemma perspective on cooperative behavior in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 23(4), 390-413.

Bednar, J., Chen, Y., Liu, T. X., & Page, S. (2012). Behavioral spillovers and cognitive load in multiple games: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), 12-31.

Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of experiments. American Psychologist, 37(3), 245-257.

Bernasconi, M., Corazzini, L., Kube, S., & Marechal, M. (2009). Two are better than one! Individuals’ contributions to “unpacked” public goods. Economic Letters, 104(1), 31-33.

Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Explaining cooperation in groups: Testing models of reciprocity and learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(2), 89-105.

Cason, T. N., Savikhin, A. C., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2012). Behavioral spillovers in coordination games. European Economic Review, 56(2), 233-245.

Cassar, A., & Friedman, D. (2004). Economics lab: An intensive course in experimental economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cross, J. G., & Guyer, M. J. (1980). Social traps. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.

De Cremer, D. (2003). How self-conception may lead to inequality: Effect of hierarchical roles on the equality rule in organizational resource-sharing tasks. Group and Organization Management, 28(2), 282-302.

De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2009). Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 45-55.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-636.

Falk, A., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2013). Living in two neighborhoods: Social interaction effects in the laboratory. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 563-578.

Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me?: A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group and Organization Management, 32(4), 465-499.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171-178.

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economic Letters, 71(3), 397-404.

Friedman, D., & Sunder, S. (1994). Experimental methods: A primer for economists: Cambridge University Press.

Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gifford, R. (2008a). Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(4), 273-280.

Gifford, R. (2008b). Toward a comprehensive model of social dilemmas. In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Garling & M. Gustafson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 265-279). New York, NY: Springer.

Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290-302.

Gold, D. (1969). Statistical tests and substantive significance. American Sociologist, 4(1), 42-46.

Greiner, B. (2004). The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A guide for the organization of experiments in economics, Working Paper Series in Economics #10). University of Cologne.

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.

Hardin, G. (1974). Living on a lifeboat. BioScience, 24(10), 561-568.

Hollenbeck, J. R. (2008). The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinus & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Journal editing: Opening the black box (pp. 16-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Ichino, A., & Maggi, G. (2000). Work environment and individual background: Explaining regional shirking differentials in a large Italian firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 1057-1090.

Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Governing social-ecological systems. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (pp. 1465-1509). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Kirk, R., E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746-759.

Koger, S. M., & Winter, D. D. (2010). What on Earth are we doing? In S. M. Koger & D. D. Winter (Eds.), The psychology of environmental problems: Psychology for sustainability (pp. 1-29). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.

Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H.-Y. (2005). An action pattern model of inter-firm cooperation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1123-1153.

March, J. G. (1994). A primer of decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: Free Press.

McCarter, M. W., Budescu, D. V., & Scheffran, J. (2011). The give-or-take-some dilemma: An empirical investigation of a hybrid social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 83-95.

McCarter, M. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Happy together? Insights and implications of viewing managed supply chains as a social dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 498-511.

McCarter, M. W., Rockmann, K. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2010). Is it even worth it? The effect of loss prospects in the outcome distribution of a public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(1), 1-11.

McCarter, M. W., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). You can’t place old wine in new bottles: The effect of newcomers on coordination in groups. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55058.

McCloskey, D. N., & Ziliak, S. T. (1996). The standard error of regressions. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), 97-114.

Messick, D. M. (1999). Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(1), 11-28.

Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. (1983). Solving social dilemmas. In L. Wheeler, & Shaver, P. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

O’Leary, M. B., Woolley, A. W., & Mortensen, M. (2011). Multiteam membership in relation to multiteam systems. In S. Zaccaro, M. Marks & L. DeChurch (Eds.), Multi-team systems: An organization form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 141-172). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Orlitzky, M. (2012). How can significance tests be deinstitutionalized? Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 199-228.

Polzer, J. T., Stewart, K. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1999). A social categorization explanation for framing effects in nested social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 154-178.

Rockmann, K. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2008). To be or not to be trusted: The influence of media richness on defection and deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 106-122.

Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economic and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.

Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23-44.

Savikhin, A. C., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Simultaneous decision-making in competitive and cooperative environments. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1311-1323.

Simon, J. M. (1996). The ultimate resource 2. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684-707.

Thorngate, W. (1976). Possible limits on a science of social behavior. In L. H. Strickland, F. E. Aboud & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 121-139). New York, NY: Springer.

Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125-141.

Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 281-307.

Wit, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). “Me versus just us verus all” categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 616-637.

Yamagishi, T., & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 67-73.

Young-Ybarra, C., & Wiersema, M. (1999). Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. Organization Science, 10(4), 439-459.

Zeng, M., & Chen, X.-P. (2003). Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 587-605.