Argumentación y guerras civiles

Estrada, Fernando (2014): Argumentación y guerras civiles.

Abstract

In this article, basic aspects of the argumentation, the argumentation relations with the concept of logical inference and illustration argumentation on international comparative policy analysis are presented. The argumentation is understood as part of a deliberative process reasons for or against a point of view that can be defended by a confrontation of ideas. Therefore who argues: proposed refutes defeat or justify a particular worldview. For this purpose, a brief preliminary description of deductive argument systems (SDA). Degree of formalization from logic to structure the foundations of argumentation in general is introduced, then an illustration is provided based on a case widely recognized in international politics: the conditions of the public debate that led to the invasion and war against Iraq.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Argumentation and Civil Wars
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Irak, Civil Wars, Logic, Argumentation, International Relations
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security ; Economic Nationalism; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F54 - Colonialism ; Imperialism ; Postcolonialism; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2005), pages 35–44, New York, NY, USA, 2005., ACM Press.

Austin, John, L., How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford., (trad. Española de G. Carrió y E. Rabossi, Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1971. [Aus62] Austin, John, L., How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford., (trad. Española de G. Carrió y E. Rabossi, Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1971.

Beckert, B., Hänle, R.- y Manya, F. The sat problem of signed cnf formulas. En Labelled Deduction, D. Basin, M.D´Agostino, D. Gabbay, S. Mattews, y L. Vignano, Editores. Kluwer Academia Publisher, 2000, pp. 1-22.

M.E.Bratman, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A, 1987.

Brewka, G. Cumulative defeault logic in defence of nonmonotonic inference rules. Artificial Intelligence 50, 2 (1991), 183 – 205.

Carbogim, D., Roberson, D., Y Lee,J. Argument-based applications to Knowdledge enginering. The Knowledge Enginering, Review 2000. [Elst. 84.98] Jon Elster., Ulises y las sirenas, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1984; Juicios Salomónicos, Barcelona, Gedisa, 1998.

Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2001. “La Retórica del Paramilitarismo”. Revista Análisis Político. Bogotá: v.44, p.39 – 57; Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2004, Las Metáforas de una Guerra Perpetua. Pragmática del discurso en el conflicto armado colombiano, Medellín Colombia: Fondo Editorial Universidad EAFIT, (Segunda reimpresión diciembre de 2004); Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2006b,, “Rumor e información. Estrategias por el poder local”. Revista SEMANA. Bogotá Colombia.

Gabbay, D. Labelling Deductive Systems (vol.1) Oxford University Press (Volume 33 of Oxford Logia Guides, 1996.

García, A-J., Programación en lógica rebatible: su definición (msc thesis). Tesis de Maestría. Departamento de Cs. De la Computación Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, Julio de 1997.

Adolfo L. Gómez, El primado de la razón práctica, Cali, Universidad del Valle, 1994.

Karacapildis N., and P. Moraitis. Engineering issues in inter-agent dialogues. Proc. of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligent (ECAI 02), Lyon, France, 2002.

Krause, P., Clark, D. Representing uncertain knowledge: an artificial intelligence approach. Intellect Books, Oxford, 1993. Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, Adversarial or inquisitorial: comparing systems. In: Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, Editors, Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice, Kluwer, New York (2003), pp. 1–19.

Loui, R.P., Defeat Among Argument: A System of Defeasible Inference. Computational Intelligence 3,3, 1987.

Loui, R.P., Ampliative inference, computation and dialectic. En A rtificial Intelligence and Philosophy, R. Cummins y J. Pollok, Editores, 1991.

Modgil, S. A Labelled System for Practical reasoning. Tesis PhD Imperial College, London, Diciembre 1998.

Alfonso, Monsalve, La teoría de la argumentación, Medellín, Universidad de Antioquia, 1995.

Mcore R., J., Semantical considerations on non-monotonic logia. Artificial Intelligence 25 (1985), 272-279.

McCarthy, J. Circumscription – A form of Non–monotonic Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980), 1-18.

Pancho Tolchinsky, Ulises Cortés, Sanjay Modgil, Francisco Caballero, and Antonio López-Navidad, Increasing Human-Organ Transplant Availability: Argumentation-Based Agent Deliberation, Vol. 21, No. 6, November/December 2006.

S. Parsons, C. Sierra and N.R. Jennings, Agents that reason and negotiate by arguying. Logic and Computation 8 3 (1998), pp. 261–292.

Ch. Perelman, El Imperio Retórico, Bogotá, Editorial Norma, 1998.

Pollok, J., Defeasible Reasonig. Cognitive Science 11 (1987), 481-518; [Sim89] Simari, G.R. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Tesis PhD, Eashington University. Department of Computer Science, (Dic.1984).

Pollok, J.L., Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.

Prakken, H. Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. En Proceedings of Heli 2000 (2000).

Prakken, H., y Vreeswijk, G. Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. En Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, Ed. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999.

Prakken, H., y Sartor, G. A system for defeasible argumentation with defeasible priorities. En Workshop on Computational Dialectics. Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR) Bonn, Alemania, 1993.

Prakken, H., Sartor, G., Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 7 (1997), 25-75.

Reyter, R. A Logic for Defeault Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1, 2 (April 1980), 81-132.

A. Rao and M. Georgeff, Modeling rational agents within BDI architecture. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference of Knowledge Representation, Cambridge, MA, , Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA , 1991, pp. 473–484.

Russo, A. Modal labelled Deductive System. Tesis PhD, Imperial College, London, UK, 1996.

Simari,G.R., y Loui, R.P. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992), 125-157.

Simari, G. R., Chesñevar, C.I., y García, A.J. The role of dialectics in defeasible argumentation. En Anales de la XIV Conferencia Internacional de la Sociedad Chilena para Ciencias de la Computación (Noviembre 1994), Universidad de la Concepción, Concepción (Chile).

Simari,G.R., y Loui, R.P. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992), 125-157.

Simari, G.R., Chesñevar, C.I., The role of dialecticas in defeasible argumentation, anales de la XIV Conferencia Internacional de la Sociedad Chilena para Ciencias de la Computación (Noviembre 1994), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción (Chile).

Simari, G. R., Chesñevar, C.I., y García, A.J. The role of dialectics in defeasible argumentation. En Anales de la XIV Conferencia Internacional de la Sociedad Chilena para Ciencias de la Computación (Noviembre 1994), Universidad de la Concepción, Concepción (Chile).

John Searle, Speech Acts, Cambridge, University Press Cambridge, 1969. (trad. Española, Actos de Habla, Editorial Cátedra, Madrid, 1989.) ; Expresión and Meaning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.

Vreeswijk, G.A., Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. Tesis PhD. Vrije University, Amsterdam (Holanda), 1993.

D.N. Walton.. Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J, USA, 1996.