Globalization and Environment: Can Pollution Haven Hypothesis alone explain the impact of Globalization on Environment?

Dinda, Soumyananda (2006): Globalization and Environment: Can Pollution Haven Hypothesis alone explain the impact of Globalization on Environment?

Abstract

The economic literature on trade and environment seeks empirically test hypotheses about how trade affects the environment. It is important to resolve current policy debates. Applying panel data technique we examine the impacts of globalization on pollution level, pollution intensity and relative change of pollution for the developed (OECD), developing (Non-OECD) country groups, and the world as a whole. This paper examines the factor endowment and pollution haven hypotheses that predict how trade affects the environment. Interaction effects also play a crucial role to determine the impact of globalization on environment. In this study we use CO2 emission data and observe that the impact of globalization on environment heavily depends on the basic characteristics of a country and its dominating comparative advantage. The empirical results suggest that globalization increases CO2 emission, which is the main culprit of the global warming.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pollution Haven Hypothesis, Factor Endowment Hypothesis, Globalization, PHH, FEH, and interaction effect
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

• Agras, J. and D. Chapman (1999): “A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis”, Ecological Economics 28(2), 267 - 277.

• Antweiler, W., B. R. Copeland and M. S. Taylor (2001): “Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?”, American Economic Review 91(4), 877 – 908.

• Baltagi, B. H. (1999): Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

• Bommer, Rolf (1999): “Environmental Policy and Industrial Competitiveness: The Pollution Haven Hypothesis Reconsidered”, Review of International Economics 7(2), 342 – 355.

• Brock, W. A. and M. S. Taylor (2004): “Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics”, NBER Working Paper 10854.

• Cole, M. A. (2004): “Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages”, Ecological Economics 48 (1), 71-81.

• Cole, M. A. (2003): “Development, trade, and the environment: how robust is the Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Environment and Development Economics 8, 557 – 580.

• Coondoo, D. and S. Dinda (2002): “Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis”, Ecological Economics 40 (3), 351 -367.

• Copeland, B. R., and M. S. Taylor (2004): “Trade, Growth and the Environment”, Journal of Economic Literature XLII, 7 – 71.

• Copeland, B. R., and M. S. Taylor (1995): “Trade and environment: a partial synthesis”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 765 - 771.

• Dinda, S., and D. Coondoo (2006): “Income and Emission: A Panel Data based Cointegration Analysis”, Ecological Economics 57(2), 167 - 181.

• Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1991): Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER working paper 3914.

• Hettige, H., R. E. B. Lucas and D. Wheeler (1992): “The Toxic Intensity of Industrial Production: Global patterns, Trends and Trade Policy”, American Economic Review 82, 478 - 481.

• Hettige, H., M. Mani and D. Wheeler (2000): “Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited”, Journal of Development Economics 62, 445 - 476.

• Kuznets, Simon (1955): “Economic Growth and income inequality”, American Economic Review 45, 1 - 28.

• Liang, F. H., (2006): “Does Foreign Direct Investment Harm the Host Country’s Environment? Evidence from China”, UC Berkeley, mimeo.

• Liddle, B. (2001): “Free trade and the environment-development system”, Ecological Economics 39, 21 – 36.

• Lopez, R. (1994): “The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization”, Journal of Environmental Economics and management 27, 163 - 184.

• Low, P. and A. Yeats (1992): “Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate?” In P. Low (ed.), International Trade and environment., World Bank., Washington, D.C.

• Lucas, R. E. B., D. Wheeler and H. Hettige (1992): “Economic development, Environmental Regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960 – 1988”, in P. Low (ed.) International Trade and the Environment, World Bank discussion paper 159, World Bank., Washington, D.C.

• Mani, M. and D. Wheeler (1998): “In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy: 1960 – 1995”., Journal of Environment and Development 7(3), 215 - 247.

• Mukhopadhyay, K., Chakraborty, D. and Dietzenbacher, E., (2005): “Pollution Haven and Factor Endowment Hypotheses Revisited: Evidence from India”, paper presented in the Fifth International Input-Output Conference at Renmin University in Beijing, China, during June 27 – July 1.

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory, CDIAC, Environmental Science Division, 1998, Estimates of global, regional and national CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning, cement manufacturing and gas flaring: 1755 – 1996, available at http://www.cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp030/global97.ems, (updated 2000).

• Rothman, D. S. (1998): Environmental Kuznets curve- real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-base approaches, Ecological Economics 25, 177-194.

• Summers, R. and A. Heston (1994): “Penn World Table (Version 5.6): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons:1950–1992”, NBER, PWT5.6, available at http://www.nber.org/pwt5.6.

• Suri, V. and D. Chapman (1998): Economic growth, trade and the energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve, Ecological Economics 25, 195 -208.

• Temurshoev, U., (2006): “Pollution Haven Hypothesis or Factor Endowment Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Examination for the US and China”, CERGE-EI, Working paper 292.

• Tisdell, C. (2001): “Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO”, Ecological Economics 39, 185 -196.

• Wheeler, D. (2000): “Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Pollution in Developing Countries”, World Bank Development Research Group Working Paper No. 2524.

• World Bank (1992): World Development Report 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.