On the Missing Macroeconomics of Social Liberalism: From Physiocrats to Pre-war Chicagoans and Freiburg

Soldatos, Gerasimos T. (2014): On the Missing Macroeconomics of Social Liberalism: From Physiocrats to Pre-war Chicagoans and Freiburg. Published in: Contribuciones a la Economía

Abstract

Put in terms of the two fundamental theorems of welfare economics, social or welfare liberalism is being defined as the tenet criticizing classical liberalism for neglecting the second theorem, having nothing to say about the “liberalism” of macroeconomic policymaking. This note claims that the macroeconomic dimension of social liberalism is the one advanced by pre-war, Old Chicago, which, based on the quantity theory of money, was maintaining (i) that it abides by laissez-faire but against classical liberalism’s laissez faire of “let the cycle run its course”, and given (ii) that Old Chicago was seeing government intervention necessary for income-redistribution reasons, too. Which of the two liberalisms holds the true version of laissez faire? Going back to the Physiocrats who had coined the term, one realizes that they had done so from the welfare liberalist point of view abstracting from the macro-monetary issues raised of Jean Bodin separately. This abstraction continues until today neglecting the “fact” that what Old Chicago had really done was to integrate into social liberalism the quantity-theory-of-money macro-monetary considerations having started with Bodin. The German “experiment” with the Freiburg-School-inspired Soziale Marktwirtschaft - an experiment in social liberalism - attests to the need for “Chicago rules” if social liberalism is to stand out as a different system altogether. In sum, the only microeconomics-cum-macroeconomics consistent with the true, the socio-liberal laissez-faire is the Old Chicago economics. Examples in classical liberalism are Monetarism and Austrian economics whereas Keynesianism and Marxism abandon laissez faire altogether.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Liberalism, Physiocrats, Pre-war Chicagoans, Soziale Marktwirtschaft, Macro-Monetary Economics
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems

References

Arnold, Matthew, (1965 [1869]), “Culture and Anarchy with Friendship's Garland and Some Literary Essays”, in Robert H. Super (ed.), The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, vol.5, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.

Barry, Norman P., (1984), “Unanimity, Agreement, and Liberalism: A Critique of James Buchanan's Social Philosophy”, Political Theory, 12(4), 579-596.

Bezbakh, Pierre, (2011), “Vincent de Gournay, un Libéral Protectionniste”, LE MONDE ECONOMIE, 14.02.2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2011/02/14/vincent-de-gournay-un-liberal-protectionniste_1479707_3232.html.

Bodin, Jean , (1997 [1568-78]), Response to the Paradoxes of Malestroit, trans. and eds. Henry Tudor and R. W. Dyson, Bristol, Thoemmes Continuum.

Boldeman, Lee, (2007), “The Cult of the Market: Economic Fundamentalism and its Discontents”, ANU E Press: Canberra, http://press.anu.edu.au//cotm/pdf/whole_book.pdf.

Brack, Duncan, Richard S. Grayson and David Howarth, eds., (2007), Reinventing the State: Social Liberalism for the 21st Century, London, Methuen Ltd.

Buchanan, James M., (2010), “Chicago School Thinking: Old and New”, Paper presented at the 11th Summer Institute for the History of Economics at the University of Richmond, online available: http://jepson.richmond.edu/conferences/adam-smith/paper2010buchanan.pdf.

Cranston, Maurice, (2006 [1967]), “Liberalism”, in Donald M. Borchert, ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 5, pp. 319-323, New York, Thomson Gale.

d'Argenson, René de Voyer, (1751), “Lettre au sujet de la dissertation sur le commerce du marquis de Belloni”, Journal Oeconomique , p.111. http://books.google.gr/books?id=k4ABAAAAYAAJ&vq=morbleu&dq=editions:NYPL33433007441680&lr=&pg=RA3-PA111&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Davis, Ronnie J., (1968), Chicago Economists, Deficit Budgets, and the Early 1930s, American Economic Review, 58(3), 476-481.

De Long, Bradford J., (1990), In Defense of Henry Simons’ Standing as a Classical Liberal, Cato Journal, 9(3), 601-618.

Faccarello, Gilbert and Philippe Steiner, (2012),” ‘Philosophie économique’ and Money in France, 1750-1776: The Stakes of a Transformation”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(3), 325-353.

Faguet, Émile, (1903), Le Libéralisme, Paris, Société Française d'Imprimerie et de Librairie.

Farhi, Emmanuel and IvanWerning, (2012), “On the Inefficiency of Financial Market Equilibria in Macroeconomic Models with Nominal Rigidities”, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper, http://www.bostonfed.org/Macro-Finance-2013/papers/farhi-werning.pdf.

Farrell, M.J., (1976), “Liberalism in the Theory of Social Choice”, Review of Economic Studies, 43(1), 3-10.

Fine, Sidney. (1964), Laissez Faire and the General-Welfare State, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.

Froese, Katrin, (2001), Beyond Liberalism: The Moral Community of Rousseau's Social Contract, Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(3), 579-600.

Gerlach, Christian, (2005), Wu-Wei in Europe - A Study of Eurasian Economic Thought, London School of Economics Working Paper No 12/05.

Goldschmidt, Nils (2004), “Alfred Müller-Armack and Ludwig Erhard: Social Market Liberalism”, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, No. 04/12.

Goldschmidt, Nils and Michael Wohlgemuth (2008), “Social Market Economy: Origins, Meanings and Interpretations”, Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 261–276.

Grandvilliers, Jean de, (1914), Essai sur le Libéralisme Allemand, Paris, M. Giard & É. Briére.

Green, Thomas Hill, (1999 [1883]) Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, Kitchener, Ontario, Batoche Books.

Higgs, Henry, (2001 [1897]), The Physiocrats: Six Lectures on the French Économistes of the 18th Century, Kitchener, Ontario, Batoche Books.

Kitch, Edward W., ed., (1983). “The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 163-234.

Köhler, Ekkehard and Stefan Kolev, (2011), “The Conjoint Quest for a Liberal Positive Program: ‘Old Chicago’, Freiburg and Hayek”, Hamburg Institute of International Economic Research Paper, No. 109, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48271.

Knight, Frank H., (1939), Ethics and Economic Reform: I. The Ethics of Liberalism, Economica, New Series, 6, 21, 1-29. Leonard, Thomas C., (2009), “American Economic Reform in the Progressive Era: Its Foundational Beliefs and Their Relation to Eugenics”, History of Political Economy, 41(1), 109-141.

Maverick, Lewis A., (1946), “Francois de Quesnay: Le Despotisme de la Chine (Paris 1767)”, in China−A Model for Europe, San Antonio, TX, Anderson.

McElroy, Wendy, (2010), “The Physiocrats”, The Future of Freedom Foundation Articles, http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/physiocrats/.

Mintz, Eric, (2009), Politics, Power, and the Common Good, 2nd ed., Toronto, Pearson Education.

Müller-Armack, Alfred (1978), The Social Market Economy as an Economic and Social Order, Review of Social Economy, 36, 325–331.

Pack, Spencer J., (2010), Capitalism as a Moral System: Adam Smith's Critique of the Free Market Economy, London, Edward Elgar.

Patinkin, Don, (1969), The Chicago Tradition, The Quantity Theory, And Friedman, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 46-70.

Richardson, James L., (2001), Contending Liberalisms in World Politics, London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.

Röpke, Wilhelm (1979), Die Gesellschaftskrisis der Gegenwart, 6th ed., Stuttgart, Rentsch-Verlag.

Samuels, Warren J. (1961), “The Physiocratic Theory of Property and State”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(1), 96-111.

Simons, Henry C. (1936), Rules Versus Authorities in Monetary Policy, Journal of Political Economy, 44(1), 1-30.

Starbuck, William H., (2003), “The Origins of Organization Theory”, in Haridimos Tsoukas and Christian Knudsen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Chapter 5, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, Joseph E., (2007), “The Pact with the Devil”. Beppe Grillo's Friends interview, http://www.beppegrillo.it/eng/2007/01/stiglitz.html.

Tavlas, George S., (1997), Chicago, Harvard, and the Doctrinal Foundations of Monetary Economics, Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 153-177.

Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques, (1844 [1759]), “Eloge de Vincent de Gournay”, in Eugène Daire (ed.), Oeuvres de Turgot, vol. 1, Paris, Guillaumin.