Sen, Debapriya and Stamatopoulos, Giorgos (2010): When an inefficient competitor makes higher profit than its efficient rival.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59639.pdf Download (369kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider a Cournot duopoly with strategic delegation, where quantities of firms are chosen by their managers. A firm can offer its manager one of the two incentive contracts: the profit incentive or the revenue incentive. We show that in this setting there are Nash equilibria in which an inefficient firm obtains higher profit than its efficient rival. This result continues to hold under a robust set of correlated equilibria.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | When an inefficient competitor makes higher profit than its efficient rival |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | duopoly; managerial contract; Nash equilibrium; correlated equilibrium; anticoordination games |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games |
Item ID: | 59639 |
Depositing User: | Debapriya Sen |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2014 04:43 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:44 |
References: | Calvo-Armengal, A. (2003), The set of correlated equilibria of 2times 2 games. Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series No. 79. Fershtman C., K.L. Judd (1987), Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly, American Economic Review, 77, 927-940. Kopel M., C. Loffler (2008), Commitment, first-mover and second-mover advantage, Journal of Economics, 94, 143-166. Kopel M., C. Riegler (2009), Delegation in an R&D game with spillovers, in B. Baltagi, E. Sadka (eds.) Contributions to Economic Analysis, Emerald Publishing. Lambertini L., M. Trombetta (2002), Delegation and firms' ability to collude, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,47, 359-373. Miller N., A Pazgal (2001), The equivalence of price and quantity competition with delegation, Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 284-301. Mujumdar S., D. Pal (2007), Strategic managerial incentives in a two-period Cournot duopoly, Games and Economic Behavior, 58, 338-353. Pal R. (2010), Cooperative managerial delegation, R&D and collusion. Bulletin of Economic Research, 62, 155-169. Saracho A. (2002), Patent licensing under strategic delegation, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11, 225-251. Sklivas S. (1987), The strategic choice of managerial incentives, Rand Journal of Economics, 18, 452-458. Szymanski S. (1994), Strategic delegation with endogenous costs: A duopoly with wage bargaining, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 105-116 Vickers J. (1985), Delegation and the theory of the firm, Economic Journal, 95, 138-147. Zhang J., Z. Zhang (1997), R&D in a strategic delegation game, Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 391-398. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59639 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
When an inefficient firm makes higher profit than its efficient rival. (deposited 16 Jun 2010 14:02)
- When an inefficient competitor makes higher profit than its efficient rival. (deposited 03 Nov 2014 04:43) [Currently Displayed]