Tragedy of Commonly-Shared Debts

Wayne, James J. (2014): Tragedy of Commonly-Shared Debts.

Abstract

The debates about how to deal with government budget deficits are raging all over the world. In the US, the federal government was forced to shut down for 16 days in October, 2013 because of the failure to pass a budget through congresses, and barely averted a default of federal government obligations due to failure to raise the federal debt ceiling limit. The city of Detroit filed the largest municipal bankruptcy in the US history on July 18, 2013, despite Michigan State constitution’s balanced budget requirement. In Europe, the sovereign debt crisis has dragged down the entire EU economy since late 2009 with no end in sight. In Japan, the government debt to GDP ratio is well over 200%, which is one of the highest in the world. In the world of academics, the debates of government budget deficits have become the key battlegrounds of different schools of thoughts of economics and political ideologies. Economists and political scientists could not even agree to a framework to solve budget deficit problems, and let alone settle these debates. This paper provides a permanent and equilibrium solution to government budget deficits. Surprisingly the solution comes from the first principles of quantum politics. The political equilibrium structure has the time translational symmetry in treating different generations equally. One result of applying physics laws of social science to study the most stable political structure is that the most stable political structure is not only to require the majority voters must deal with minority voters fairly to avoid the tyranny of the majority, but also to require the voting generation must exercise their fiduciary duty to their children and unborn future generations. In terms of government budget deficits, the fiduciary duty means that the current voting citizens must take the full responsible of the current government budget deficits or surplus. The permanent equilibrium solution of government budget deficits is legally and personally held all the voting citizens accountable for the current fiscal surplus and deficit at all levels of governments. In contrast to the balanced budget approaches, the permanent equilibrium solution in this paper allows deficit spending and the accumulation of government debts as long as the government debts must be paid off by the responsible borrowers and voters. This method to solve the government budget deficit problem is an excellent example of applications of law of equilibrium, which can be used to solve economic, political, and other social problems in a value-free way. The permanent solution to government budget deficits presented in this paper is consistent with a different line of reasoning in economics, which is known as the tragedy of the commons. In cases of government budget deficits, the tragedy of fiscal abuse happens because the US Constitution fails to protect interests of the future generations. Through the commonly-shared responsibility for government debts, current voters and their political representatives have financially taken unfair advantage of their children and the future generations, who virtually have no political power.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: fiscal policy, government debt, tragedy of the commons, equilibrium, physics laws of social science, Richardian equivalence, generational accounting, quantum politics, quantum economics
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt

References

1. Chris Cox and Bill Archer, 2012. “Cox and Archer: Why $16 trillion Only Hints at the True U.S. Debt”, online.wsj.com, November 28, 2012

2. Laurence Kotlikoff, 2013. “Assessing Fiscal Sustainability”, Mercatus Center, George Mason University, http://www.mercatus.org

3. James J. Wayne, 2014. “A Physics Solution to the Hardest Problem in Social Science: Physics Foundation of Permanent World Peace”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59634 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59634/ ).

4. James J. Wayne, 2005. “Physics Laws of Social Science”, Lawrence Cedar House, New Jersey

5. James J. Wayne, 2013. “Physics Laws of Social Science”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 47811 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47811/ ).

6. James J. Wayne, 2013. “Fundamental Equation of Economics”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59574 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59574/ ).

7. James J. Wayne, 2014. “A Scientific Macroeconomic Model Derived from Fundamental Equation of Economics”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59591 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59591/ ).

8. James J. Wayne, 2014. “Arrow of Time Phenomena in Social Science and Sixteen Global Mega Trends of Human Society”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59685 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59685/ ).

9. Garret Hardin, 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162 (3859): 1243-1248

10. Garret Hardin, 1998. “Extensions of “The Tragedy of the Commons””, Science, 280 (5364): 682

11. Garret Hardin, 1985. “Filters Against Folly”, Viking-Penguin, New York

12. James R. McGoodwin, 1990. “Crisis in the World’s Fisheries”, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

13. Elinor Ostrom, 1990. “Governing the Commons”, Cambridge University Press, New York

14. Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1986. "Deficit Delusion." The Public Interest (Summer 1986): 53-65.

15. Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1989. "From Deficit Delusion to the Fiscal Balance Rule—Looking for a Meaningful Way to Describe Fiscal Policy." National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 2841, February 1989.

16. Alan J. Auerbach, Jagadeesh Gokhale, and Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1991. "Generational Accounts—A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting." In Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 5, edited by David Bradford. 1991.

17. Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1992. “Generational Accounting: Knowing Who Pays and When for What We Spend”, Free Press, New York

18. James J. Wayne, 2014. “Fundamental Design Flaws of United States Constitution”, working paper, Munich University Library, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 59664 (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59664/ ).

19. Geoffrey Canada, Stanley Druckenmiller and Kevin Warsh, 2013. “Generational Theft Needs to Be Arrested”, online.wsj.com, February 14, 2013

20. David Richardo, 1820. “Essay on the Funding System”, in The Works of David Richardo. With a Notice of the Life and Writing of the Author, by J.R. McCulloch, London: John Murry, 1888.

21. James M. Buchanan, 1976. “Perceived Wealth in Bonds and Social Security: A Comment”, Journal of Political Economy 84 (2): 337-342

22. Martin Feldstein and Alan J. Aurbach, eds., 1985. “Handbook of Public Economics”, North Holland

23. Robert J. Barro, 1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1095-1117

24. Robert J. Barro, 1979. “On the Determination of the Public Debt”, Journal of Political Economy 87 (5): 940-971

25. Whitehouse.gov, 2014. “Historic Tables: Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-) as Percentage of GDP: 1930-2019”, Office of Management and Budget.