Gravity for Outsourcing: an Application with Input-Output Dataset.

de Mello-Sampayo, Felipa (2014): Gravity for Outsourcing: an Application with Input-Output Dataset.

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of gravity on outsourcing. We derive a gravity equation from the classical spatial supply problem in which firms purchase some of their inputs from other firms paying the required transport costs. We also allow for different levels of productivity of the firms and build a gravity equation from entropy maximization. Even if the gravity equations look similar, we show that their underlying structures are different. In general terms, countries are viewed as competing with each other for interaction. The competing destinations gravity model represents a step forward in the recognition of interdependencies in spatial choice. Thus, we include a variable to explain the spatial structure of outsourcing countries in a geographical system. We find much stronger support for the gravity equation derived from the probabilistic input demand function than for the deterministic gravity model. The model shows that outsourcing is carried out mostly because of factor cost differentials and technological differences, but that distance and the gravity of other countries adversely affect trade in intermediate goods and services.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Outsourcing, Gravity Model, Trade, MNEs, Poisson regression
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models

References

Anderson, J. E. (1979), “A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation.”, American Economic Review 69, 106-116.

Anderson, J. E. (2010), The gravity model., Technical report, NBER Working Paper No. 16576.

Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003), “Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle”, American Economic Review 93, 170-192.

Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2004), “Trade costs.”', Journal of Economic Literature 42, 691-751.

Anderson, J. E. and Yotov, Y. V. (2010), “The changing incidence of geography.”, American Economic Review 100, 2157-86.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2001), “The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity.”, Journal of International Economics 53, 1-27.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2002), On the endogeneity of international trade flows and free trade agreements., Technical report, University of Notre Dame, Working Papers August 2002.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2007), “Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?”, Journal of International Economics 71, 72-95.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009), “Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade cost effects using the gravity equation.”, Journal of International Economics 77, 77-85.

Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. (2014), Panel data gravity models of international trade., Technical report, CESIFO Working Paper No. 4616.

Bergstrand, J. H. (1985), “The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence.”, Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 474-81.

Bergstrand, J. H., Egger, P. and Larch, M. (2007), Gravity redux: Structural estimation of gravity equations with asymmetric bilateral trade costs., Technical report, University of Notre Dame, Working Papers October 2007.

Braconier, H., Norback, P.-J. and Urban, D. (2005), “Reconciling the evidence of the knowledge capital model.”, Review of International Economics 13, 770-86.

Brainard, S. L. (1997), “An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade.”, American Economic Review 87, 520-44.

Chaney, T. (2008), “Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade.”, American Economic Review 98, 1707-21.

de Mello-Sampayo, F. (2009), “Competing-destinations gravity model: an application to the geographic distribution of FDI”, Applied Economics 41, 2237-53.

Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (2002), “Technology, geography, and trade.”, Econometrica 70, 1741-79.

Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. (2004), “Distance, trade and FDI: A SUR.”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 19, 227-46.

Evenett, S. and Keller, W. (2002), “On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation.”, Journal of Political Economy 110, 281-316.

Feenstra, R. (2004), Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Fotheringham, A. S. (1983a), “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations”, Environment and Planning A 15, 15-36.

Fotheringham, A. S. (1983b), “Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance for production-constraint gravity models”, Environment and Planning A 15, 1121-32.

Fotheringham, A. S. (1984), “Spatial ows and spatial patterns.”, Environment and Planning A 16, 529-42.

Grossman, G. M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006a), The rise of offshoring: It's not wine for cloth anymore, The New Economic Geography: Effects and Policy Implications, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

Grossman, G. M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006b), Trading tasks: A simple theory of off-shoring, Working Paper 12721, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Guimaraes, P., Figueiredo, O. and Woodward, D. (2003), “A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem.”, Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 201-04.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2002), Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade., Technical report, CEPII, Working Paper No 2002-01.

Heckman, J. (1979), “Sample selection bias as a specification error.”, Econometrica 47, 153-61.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J. and Rubinstein, Y. (2008), “Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes.”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 441-487.

Kleinert, J. and Toubal, F. (2010), “Gravity for FDI.”, Review of International Economics 18, 1-13.

Redding, S. J. and Venables, A. J. (2003), “South-East-Asian export performance: External market access and internal market supply.”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 17, 404-41.

Roy, J. R. (2004), Spatial Interaction Modelling: A regional Science Context, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

Santos-Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2006), “The log of gravity.”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 641-58.

Thorsen, I. and Gitlesen, J. P. (1998), “Empirical evaluation of alternative model specifications to predict commuting flows.”, Journal of Regional Science 38, 272-92.

Wooldridge, J. M. (1999), “Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models.”, Journal of Econometrics 90, 77-97.