Md., Samsur Jaman (2014): Monitoring Structural Changes in NER: -An Empirical Analysis of Mizoram.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_60270.pdf Download (192kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper adopts a recent development in the estimation and testing of multiple structural breaks in linear growth model to identify the phases of economic growth in Mizoram since 1980. Breakdates and growth rates of different phases are estimated using the recent developed methodology of Bai and Perron(2003). It is evident from the estimation that most of the breakdates lie mainly in 1984-85, 1992-93, and 1998-99. From the estimation, it is further noticed that GSDP (Gross State Domestic Product) of Mizoram has two breakdates 1984-85 and 1990-91. Corresponding to these breakdates there are three different growth phases are also noticed. During 1980/81-1984/85, the first phase of growth, the economy grows at 11.7% which is declining to 6.55% during 1984/85-1990/91, the second phase and slightly increases the annual growth rate to 6.8% during 190/91-2008/09, the third phase.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Monitoring Structural Changes in NER: -An Empirical Analysis of Mizoram |
English Title: | Monitoring Structural Changes in NER: -An Empirical Analysis of Mizoram |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Structural breaks, BIC, OLS-CUSUM test, Sectoral linkage |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence |
Item ID: | 60270 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Md. Samsur Jaman |
Date Deposited: | 30 Nov 2014 19:05 |
Last Modified: | 06 Oct 2019 17:09 |
References: | 1. Acharya, S (2002): ‘India’s Medium-term Growth Prospects’, Economic and Political Weekly, July 13: 2897-2906. 2. Bai, J (1997): ‘Estimation of a Change Point in Multiple Regression Models’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79: 551-63. 3. Bai, J, P Perron (1998): ‘Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes’, Econometrica, 66: 47-78. 4. Bai, J, P Perron (2003): Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18: 1-22. 5. Balakrishnan, P (2005): ‘Macroeconomic Policy and Economic Growth in the 1990s’, Economic and Political Weekly, September 3: 3969-77. 6. Balakrishnan, P, Parameswaran, M (2007): ‘Understanding Economic Growth in India: A prerequisite.’, Economic and Political Weekly, July 14, 2007: 2915-2922. 7. Ben-David, Dan and David H Papell (1998): ‘Slowdowns and Meltdowns: Postwar Growth Evidence from 74 Countries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 561-71. 8. Blunch, N.H., and D. Verner (2006). Shared sectoral growth versus the dual economy model: Evidence from Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, and Zimbabwe. Journal Compilation, African Development Bank, 2006. 9. Boyce, J K (1986): ‘Kinked Exponential Models for Growth Rate Estimation’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48: 385-91. 10. Deng, Ai and Pierre Perron (2005): ‘A Comparison of Alternative Asymptotic Frameworks to Analyse a Structural Change in a Liner Time Trend’, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Boston University. 11. Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057-1072. 12. Fischer, S (2003): ‘Globalisation and Its Challenges’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 93: 1-30. 13. Hansen, B E (2001): ‘The New Econometrics of Structural Change: Dating Breaks in US Labour Productivity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15: 117-28. 14. Hatekar, N and A Dongre (2005): ‘Structural Breaks in India’s Growth: Revisiting the Debate with Longer Perspective’, Economic and Political Weekly, April 2: 1432-35. 15. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistics analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254. 16. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1992). Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 211-244. 17. Kaur, P (2007): ‘Growth Acceleration in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, April 14:1380-86. 18. Kohli, A (2006): ‘Politics of Economic Growth in India, 1980-2005, Part I: The 1980s’, Economic and Political Weekly, April 1: 1251-59. 19. Nagaraj, R (2006): Aspects of India’s Economic Growth and Reforms, Academic Foundation, New Delhi. 20. Nayar, B R (2006): ‘When Did the ‘Hindu’ Rate of Growth End?’, Economic and Political Weekly, May 13: 1885-90. 21. Nayyar, D (2006): ‘Economic Growth in India in Independent India: Lumbering Elephant or Running Tiger?’, Economic and Political Weekly, April 15: 1451-58. 22. Panagariya, A (2004): ‘Growth and Reforms during 1980s and 1990s’, Economic and Political Weekly, June 19: 2581-94. 23. Perron, P and X Zhu (2005): ‘Structural Breaks with Deterministic and Stochastic Trends’, Journal of Econometrics, 129: 65-119. 24. Rodrik, D, A Subramanian (2005): ‘From ‘Hindu Growth’ to Productivity Surge: The Mystery of Indian Growth Transition’, IMF Staff Papers, 52: 193-228. 25. Virmani, A (2006): ‘India’s Economic Growth History: Fluctuations, Trends, Break Points and Phases’, Indian Economic Review, 41: 81-103. 26. Vogel, S. J. (1994). Structural changes in agriculture: Production linkages and agricultural demand-led industrialization. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(1): 136–156. 27. Wallack, J S (2003): ‘Structural Breaks in Indian Macroeconomic Data’, Economic and Political Weekly, October 11: 4312-15. 28. Wang, Z (2006): ‘The Joint Determination of the Number and the Type of Structural Changes’, Economic Letters, 93: 222-27 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/60270 |