Donald, Vandegrift and Michael, Lahr (2007): Open Space Purchases, House Prices, and the Tax Base.
Download (856kB) | Preview
This paper examines the effect of public acquisitions of open space on house prices and the municipal tax base. While a series of studies show that open space acquisitions raise values of nearby properties, no research to date appears to focus upon the effect of open space acquisitions upon local tax base. Existing studies focus on the effect of open space acreage on house prices. We examine the effect of open space expenditures on house prices at the municipal level. We find that a one-dollar increase in open space expenditures per housing unit is associated with average house prices that are about $13 higher and with a tax base that is about $15 lower per acre. Open space expenditures per housing unit also show a consistent positive effect on the percentage change in house prices over the period 1995-2000. However, we find no statistically significant effect from open space expenditures on the percentage change in the tax base over the period 1995-2000. Local funding (rather than state funding) for open space has a smaller impact on house prices but the effect is significant only in some specifications. Despite the negative effect of open space purchases on the tax base, we find that higher open space expenditures are associated with lower tax rates. In addition, we find that while higher tax rates are associated with a lower tax base, a larger tax base does depress tax rates. The percentage change in the general property tax rate over the period 1995-2000 shows a significant negative effect on the percentage change in the tax base per acre over the period.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Open Space Purchases, House Prices, and the Tax Base|
|Keywords:||Open Space, Tax Base, Municipality, Tax Rate|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R51 - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations
|Depositing User:||Michael Lahr|
|Date Deposited:||05. Dec 2007 15:19|
|Last Modified:||12. Mar 2015 02:50|
Anderson, Soren and West, Sara, 2006, “Open Space, Residential Property Values and Spatial Context,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 773-789.
Bates, Laurie, and Santerre, Rexford, 2001, “The Public Demand for Open Space: The Case of Connecticut Communities,” Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 97-111.
Bolitzer, B. and Netusil, N. R., 2000, “The Impact of Open Spaces on Property Values in Portland Oregon,” Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 185-193.
Breffle, William S., Morey, Edward R., and Lodder, Tymon S., 1998, “Using Contingent Valuation to Estimate a Neighborhood’s Willingness to Pay to Preserve Undeveloped Urban Land,” Urban Studies, 35, 715-727.
Brett, Craig and Pinske, Joris, 2000, “The Determinants of Municipal Tax Rates in British Columbia,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, 695-714.
Champ, Patricia, and Loomis, John B., 1998, “WTA Estimates Using the Method of Paired Comparison,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 375-386.
Costanza, Robert, Wilson, Matthew, Troy, Austin, Voinov, Alexey, Liu, Shuang, and D’Agostino, John, 2006, “The Value of New Jersey’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital,” Report #SR04-075, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
Cropper, Maureen L., Deck, Leland B., and McConnell, Kenneth E., 1988, On the Choice of Functional Forms for Hedonic Price Functions,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 668-675.
Drake, L., 1992, “The Non-Market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 19, 351-354.
Earnhardt, Dietrich, 2006, “Using Contingent-Pricing Analysis to Value Open Space and Its Duration at Residential Locations,” Land Economics, 82, 17-35.
Geoghegan, Jacqueline, Wainger, Lisa, and Bockstael, Nancy, 1997, “Spatial Landscape Indices in a Hedonic Framework: An Ecological Analysis Using GIS,” Ecological Economics, 23, 251-264.
Geoghegan, Jacqueline, 2002, “The Value of Open Spaces in Residential Land Use,” Land Use Policy, 19, 91-98.
Hoyt, W., 1991, “Property Taxation, Nash Equilibrium, and Market Power,” Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 123-131.
Irwin, Elena, 2002, “The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values,” Land Economics, 78, 465-480.
Kline, Jeffrey and Dennis Wichelns, 1998, “Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Preserving Farmland and Open Space,” Ecological Economics, 26, 211-224.
Ladd, Helen F. and Bradbury, Katherine L., 1988, “City Taxes and Property Tax Bases,” National Tax Journal, 41, 503-23.
Lang, Kevin and Jian, Tianlun, 2004, “Property Taxes and Property Values: Evidence from Proposition 2 ½” Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 439-457.
Lutzenhiser, Margot, and Netusil, Noelwah, 2001, “The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home’s Sale Price,” Contemporary Economic Policy, 19, 291-298.
Pruckner, G., 1995, “Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 22, 173-190.
Shultz, Steven D. and King, David A., 2001, “The Use of Census Data for Hedonic Price Estimates of Open Space Amenities and Land Use,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 239-252.
Wildasin, David, 1988, “Nash Equilibrium in Models of Fiscal Competition,” Journal of Public Economics, 35, 229-240.