New findings from the TTO for income approach to elicit willingness to pay for a QALY

Attema, Arthur and Krol, Marieke and van Exel, Job and Brouwer, Werner (2014): New findings from the TTO for income approach to elicit willingness to pay for a QALY.

Abstract

Willingness to pay (WTP) elicitations suffer from various methodological problems. This paper tests a recently proposed alternative approach to value WTP for health, making use of trade-offs between income and lifetime or quality of life. We apply three experimental elicitation procedures and analyze the responses under an additive and a multiplicative utility function over health and income. We report several interesting results. First, the data are highly skewed, but if we trim the 5% lowest and highest values, we obtain plausible WTP estimates. Second, the results differ considerably between procedures, indicating that WTP estimates are sensitive to the assumed utility function. Third, respondents appear to be loss averse for both health and money, which is consistent with assumptions from prospect theory. Finally, our results also indicate that respondents are more willing to trade quality of life than life years.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: loss aversion; time tradeoff method; QALY; utility of health and wealth; willingness to pay
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I10 - General

References

-Abellán-Perpinán JM, Pinto JL, Méndez-Martinez I, Badia-Llach X. Towards a better QALY model. Health Economics 2006;15; 665-676.

-Abelson P. The Value of Life and Health for Public Policy. Economic Record 2003;79; S2-S13.

-Arnesen T, Trommald M. Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable?--A systematic review of TTO methodologies. Health Economics 2005;14; 39-53.

-Attema AE, Brouwer WBF, l'Haridon O. Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment. Journal of Health Economics 2013;32; 1057-1065.

-Attema AE, Bleichrodt H, Wakker PP. A direct method for measuring discounting and QALYs more easily and reliably. Medical Decision Making 2012;32; 583-593.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. The validity of QALYs under non-expected utility. The Economic Journal 2005;115; 533-550.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2002;46; 315-337.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Abellán-Perpinán JM. A consistency test of the time trade-off. Journal of Health Economics 2003;22; 1037-1052.

-Bobinac A, van Exel NJA, Rutten FFH, Brouwer WBF. Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: The Individual Perspective. Value in Health 2010;13; 1046-1055.

-Bobinac A, van Exel J, Rutten FFH, Brouwer WBF. GET MORE, PAY MORE? An elaborate test of construct validity of willingness to pay per QALY estimates obtained through contingent valuation. Journal of Health Economics 2012;31; 158-168.

-Bobinac A, van Exel J, Rutten FFH, Brouwer WBF. The Value of a QALY: Individual Willingness to Pay for Health Gains Under Risk. PharmacoEconomics 2014;32; 75-86.

-Claxton K, Paulden M, Gravelle H, Brouwer W, Culyer AJ. Discounting and decision making in the economic evaluation of health‐care technologies. Health Economics 2011;20; 2-15.

-Claxton, K., Walker, S., Palmer, S., Sculpher, M. 2010. Appropriate perspectives for health care decisions.

-College Voor Zorgverzekeringen (Dutch board of insurers). Dutch guidelines for pharmacoeconomic researchwww.ispor.org/PEguidelines/source/PE_guidelines_english_Netherlands.pdf. December 2013.

-Culyer A, McCabe C, Briggs A, Claxton K, Buxton M, Akehurst R, Sculpher M, Brazier J. Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2007;12; 56-58.

-Dalmau-Matarrodona E. Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros. Estimating the determinants of individuals' willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery. Health Economics 2001;10; 101-118.

-Dolan P, Edlin R. Is it really possible to build a bridge between cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis? Journal of Health Economics 2002;21; 827-843.

-Domeij D, Johannesson M. Consumption and Health. The B.E.Journal of Macroeconomics 2006;6; 1-30.

-Eeckhoudt L, Godfroid P, Marchand M. Risque de santé, médecine préventive et médecine curative. Revue D'Economie Politique 1998;108; 321-337.

-Finkelstein A, Luttmer EFP, Notowidigdo MJ. WHAT GOOD IS WEALTH WITHOUT HEALTH? THE EFFECT OF HEALTH ON THE MARGINAL UTILITY OF CONSUMPTION. Journal of the European Economic Association 2013;11; 221-258.

-Frew EJ, Whynes DK, Wolstenholme JL. Eliciting Willingness to Pay: Comparing Closed-Ended with Open-Ended and Payment Scale Formats. Medical Decision Making 2003;23; 150-159.

-Gyrd-Hansen D. Willingness to pay for a QALY. Health Economics 2003;12; 1049-1060.

-Gyrd-Hansen D, Kjær T. Disentangling WTP per QALY data: different analytical approaches, different answers. Health Economics 2012;21; 222-237.

-Hackl F, Pruckner GJ. Warm glow, free-riding and vehicle neutrality in a health-related contingent valuation study. Health Economics 2005;14; 293-306.

-Hayes K, Lockwood M, Anderson G. Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements in the Upper Narragansett Bay. Marine Resource Economics 1992;7; 75-85.

-Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG. Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year: In Search of a Standard. Medical Decision Making 2000;20; 332-342.

-Johannesson M, Johansson P. Is the valuation of a QALY gained independent of age? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Health Economics 1997;16; 589-599.

-Johannesson M, Meltzer D. Editorial: Some reflections on cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Economics 1998;7; 1-7.

-Johnson FR, Desvousges WH, Ruby MC, Stieb D, De Civita P. Eliciting Stated Health Preferences: An Application to Willingness to Pay for Longevity. Medical Decision Making 1998;18; S57-S67.

-Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 1979;47; 263-291.

-King JT, Tsevat J, Lave JR, Roberts MS. Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Implications for Societal Health Care Resource Allocation. Medical Decision Making 2005;25; 667-677.

-Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Silverdahl M, Hermansson C, Lindberg M. Quality of life, health-state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with psoriasis and atopic eczema. The British Journal of Dermatology 1999;141; 1067-1075.

-Mason H, Jones-Lee M, Donaldson C. Modelling the monetary value of a QALY: a new approach based on UK data. Health Economics 2009;18; 933-950.

-Moffett ML, Suarez-Almazor M. Prospect theory in the valuation of health. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2005;5; 499-505.

-NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisalhttp://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/technologyappraisalprocessguides/guidetothemethodsoftechnologyappraisal.jsp. 20 February 2012.

-O’Brien B, Drummond M. Statistical Versus Quantitative Significance in the Socioeconomic Evaluation of Medicines. PharmacoEconomics 1994;5; 389-398.

-Olsen JA, Donaldson C, Pereira J. The insensitivity of `willingness-to-pay' to the size of the good: New evidence for health care. Journal of Economic Psychology 2004;25; 445-460.

-Pennington M, Baker R, Brouwer W, Mason H, Hansen DG, Robinson A, Donaldson C, the EuroVaQ Team. COMPARING WTP VALUES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF QALY GAIN ELICITED FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Health Economics 2013; n/a-n/a.

-Pinto-Prades JL, Loomes G, Brey R. Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY. Journal of Health Economics 2009;28; 553-562.

-Robinson A, Gyrd-Hansen D, Bacon P, Baker R, Pennington M, Donaldson C. Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: The ‘chained’ approach. Social Science & Medicine 2013;92; 92-104.

-Samuelsen CH, Augestad LA, Stavem K, Kristiansen IS, Rand-Hendriksen K. Anchoring bias in the Lead-Time Time Time Trade-Off. 29th EuroQoL plenary. 2012.

-Shiroiwa T, Igarashi A, Fukuda T, Ikeda S. WTP for a QALY and health states: More money for severer health states? Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2013;11; 22.

-Sloan FA, Viscusi WK, Chesson HW, Conover CJ, Whetten-Goldstein K. Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: The evidence for multiple sclerosis. Journal of Health Economics 1998;17; 475-497.

-Smith RD. The relative sensitivity of willingness-to-pay and time-trade-off to changes in health status: an empirical investigation. Health Economics 2001;10; 487-497.

-Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 2000;38; 332-382.

-Stewart JM, Eamon O, Donaldson C, Shackley P. Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care? Journal of Health Economics 2002;21; 585-599.

-Tengstam S. DISABILITY AND MARGINAL UTILITY OF INCOME: EVIDENCE FROM HYPOTHETICAL CHOICES. Health Economics 2014;23; 268-282.

-Ternent L, Tsuchiya A. A Note on the Expected Biases in Conventional Iterative Health State Valuation Protocols. Medical Decision Making 2013;33; 544-546.

-Tilling C, Krol M, Attema AE, Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, van Exel NJA, Brouwer WBF. Exploring a new method for deriving the monetary value of a QALY. SSRN Working paper. 2014. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2539653.

-Treadwell JR, Lenert LA. Health Values and Prospect Theory. Medical Decision Making 1999;19; 344-352.

-Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992;5; 297-323.

-van Exel NJA, Brouwer WBF, van den Berg B, Koopmanschap MA. With a little help from an anchor: Discussion and evidence of anchoring effects in contingent valuation. The Journal of Socio-Economics 2006;35; 836-853.

-Viscusi WK, Evans WN. Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications. The American Economic Review 1990;80; 353-374.

-Wakker P, Deneffe D. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown. Management Science 1996;42; 1131-1150.