Impact of lawyers' invisible disabilities on their professional challenges and their perception of their performance

Zats, Ronit (2014): Impact of lawyers' invisible disabilities on their professional challenges and their perception of their performance. Published in: International Research Journal of York University , Vol. 1, No. 1 (May 2014): pp. 107-128.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to learn about the difficulties stemming from invisible disorders in the practice of law, what do lawyers with invisible disorders do to cope with their disorders, what are their considerations in choosing their job specialty, what is their motivation to choose law as their profession and practice it, and how do they define their professional success and failure. Practicing law is challenging in many aspects. First, one is at a position to be knowledgeable about legislation, which has a dynamic nature. There is a constant need for recognizing the issues at hand, while acting fast to find proper legislative solutions to represent the client as best as possible. To do this, a lawyer is ought to be able to properly analyze the case, be knowledgeable about relevant laws and legislation, be detail-oriented, be able to multi-task and manage large amount of information, to properly assess what the main issue at hand is, and efficiently manage the case. Practicing law also requires proper communication and having the ability to connect between details - all of which must be accomplished within a strict timeline. Therefore, to succeed as a lawyer, one should be focused, be able concentrate on a high level, and have good organizational and time management skills. Some lawyers are struggling with invisible disabilities, such as attention deficits and hyperactivity disorders, as well as learning disabilities, and for them practicing law is a double-challenge. Similarly to their colleagues, they are required to practice law as demanded by their profession, but (and mainly) cope with their invisible disorder to professionally succeed. Often individuals with invisible disabilities are unaware of their situation and to the fact that these may have been the source for their difficulties in school or at work. For example, they may have difficulties to carry through assignments from beginning to end, to focus on one task, and they may unsuccessfully try to concurrently engage in many tasks. During school they may overcome their disorder by creating coping mechanisms, such as studying in groups, rewriting assignments, and reading class' notes taken by classmates, to compensate for their disabilities. Usually such coping strategies masked their disorder from them and their surroundings. Nevertheless, other individuals with sucfh disorders are aware of their situation, thereby they have been getting accommodations to their disabilities while in school (e.g. time-adjustment during exams, fitting the type of exams to their capabilities, and tutoring). Like other students with invisible disabilities, law students with these kinds of difficulties may eventually do very well in school. The main challenge for these lawyers is in the workforce. Practicing law is a very competitive occupation. The institution of law, the clients and colleagues, and the community – all have high expectation from lawyers. In Israel there is not enough awareness for the possibility that professionals who practice law may be struggling with invisible disabilities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: lawyer, inviible disabilities, performance
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K0 - General > K00 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M59 - Other

References

A report from the American Bar Association for the legal profession.J. W. Parry & W.J. Phelan, IV (Eds.).The Second National Conference on the employment of lawyers with disabilities. American Bar Association: Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law. June 15-16, 2009, Washington, DC.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 2008. Section 12102 – Definition of disability,Title 42, Chapter 126, Retrieved: 01.04.13; http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08mark.htm#12102

Anctil, T. M., Ishikwa, M. E., & Scott, A. T. (2008). Academic identity development through self-determination: Successful college students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 164-174.

Axelrod, B. (2012). Things my father did not have time to teach me and I do not want to save my children. Greenhouse Literary.

Basas, C.G. (2010). The new boys: Women with disabilities and the legal profession BerkeleyJournal ofGenderLaw&Justice. 25, 32-124

Biederman, J & Farone, S.V. (2005). What is the prevalence of adult ADHD? Results of a population screen of 966 adults. Journal of Attention Disorders,9(2), 384-391.

Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research.Nurse Education Today, 11, 461-466.

Castan.M, Paterson.J, Richardson.P, Watt.H and Dever.M (2010). Early optimism? First-year law students' work expectations and aspirations, Legal Education 20.

Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin& Y. Lincoln (eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry(2nded.)249-291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Chapman.K, and Bowering.J, (2001). Lawyers with Disabilities: Identifying Barriers to Equality, Law Society of British Columbia , A report of the Disability Research Working Group prepared for the Equity and Diversity Committee.

Davis N. A. (2005). Invisible Disability, Ethics, 116 (1), 153-213.

Dong, Sand Oire. S. N. (2012). A Comparison of Perceptions of Factors in the Job Accommodation Process Among Employees With Disabilities, Employers, and Service Providers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin XX(X) 1–8.

DSM-IV-TR (2000). American Psychiatric Association; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: (4th Edition) Washington: DC, American Psychiatric Press.

Einat, A.(2009), a hard landing, learningdisabilities employment arena. Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House.

Elo,S. & Kyngas,H. (2008). The qualitative conent analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing,62 (1), 107-115.

Familant, B.C. (1998). The Essential Functions of Being a Lawyer with a Non-Visible Disability: On the Wings of a Kiwi Bird. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review15, 517-574.

Graaf, R , Kessler; R. C., & Fayyad (2008). Survey Initiativeon the performance of workers: results from theattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) The prevalence and effects of adult WHO World Mental Health. Occup Environ Med 2008 65: 835-842

Hensel, W.F. (2008). The Dısabılıty Dılemma: A Skeptıcal Bench &Bar, University of Pittsburgh Law Review,69 , ‏ 637-656.

Job Accommodation Network (2013).Accommodation and compliance series: Employees with Learning Disabilities. Morgantown, WV: A service of the U.S Department of Labor's Office of Disability Employment Policy.

Kravets, S., Faust, M., Lipshitz, S., and Shalhav, S. (2006). Students with nonverbal learning disabilities: Study of learning disabilities and social adaptation. http://www.ldonline.org/article/6113.

Lathamp, P. & Lathamp. H. P (2000),Attention Deficit Disorder and the law, Published by J K L Communications Learning Disabilities Association of America (2013a). LDA position statement: What are learning disabilities? Retrieved: 01.04.13 http://www.ldanatl.org/about/position/papers/LDA-Position- Statement_What-Are-Learning-Disabilities_Oct-2012.pdf

Lynn.P. (2006).Lawyers with ADHD. 23 GPSolo, 32-37. Mapou, R. L. (2009). Adult learning disabilities and ADHD: Research-informed assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Miles, M. B. &Huberman, A. M. (1994).Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mech L.D., Adams L.G., Meier T.J., Burch J.W., Dale B.W. (1998) The Wolves of Denali. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Olney, M. F. & Kim, A. (2001). Beyond adjustment: Integration of cognitive disability into identity. Disability and Society, 16(4), 563-583.

Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J. (2004). Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 803-815.

Ramsay, J. (2010). Nonmedication treatments for adult ADHD: Evaluating impact on daily functioning and well-being.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Sampat, N.M., and Grant, E.V. (2012). The aspiring attorney with ADHD: Bar accommodations or a bar to practice? Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal, 291- 352.

Shekedi.A (2007).Words that Try to Touch: Qualitative Research - Theory and Application. Tel Aviv: Ramot publishing - Tel Aviv University.

Williford, R.S., Basas, C. A., & Enyart, S.L. (Ed). (2012). Lawyers, Lead On: Lawyers with Disabilities Share Their Insights. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.