Jensen, Henning Tarp and Sherman, Robinson and Tarp, Finn (2008): Measuring Agricultural Policy Bias: General Equilibrium Analysis of Fifteen Developing Countries. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61489.pdf Download (215kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The measurement issue is the key issue in the literature on trade policy-induced agricultural price incentive bias. This paper introduces a general equilibrium effective rate of protection (GE-ERP) measure, which extends and generalizes earlier partial equilibrium nominal protection measures. For the 15 sample countries, the results indicate that the agricultural price incentive bias, which was generally perceived to exist during the 1980s, was largely eliminated during the 1990s. The results also demonstrate that general equilibrium effects and country-specific characteristics – including trade shares and intersectoral linkages – are crucial for determining the sign and magnitude of trade policy bias. The GE-ERP measure is therefore uniquely suited to capture the full impact of trade policies on agricultural price incentives. A Monte Carlo procedure confirms that the results are robust with respect to tradability assumptions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Measuring Agricultural Policy Bias: General Equilibrium Analysis of Fifteen Developing Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | CGE, Agricultural Policy, Food Policy |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy |
Item ID: | 61489 |
Depositing User: | Finn Tarp |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2015 01:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:56 |
References: | Abler, David G., Adrian G. Rodriguez, and James S. Shortle, (1999). “Parameter Uncertainty in CGE Modeling of the Environmental Impact of Economic Policies.” Environmental and Resource Economics Vol. 14(1). Agénor, Pierre-Richard, Mustapha K. Nabli, Tarik Yousef, and Henning T. Jensen, (2007). “Labor Market Reform, Growth, and Unemployment in Labor-Exporting Countries in the Middle East and North Africa.” Journal of Policy Modelling Vol. 29(2). Anderson, Kym, (2006). “Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 88(5), pp. 1135-46. Anderson, Kym, (2007). “Outline of the research project on Distortions to Agricultural Incentives.” World Bank, Washington DC. Anderson, Kym, William J. Martin and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe (2005). “Would Multilateral Trade Reform Benefit Sub-Saharan Africans.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3616, World Bank, Washington DC. Anderson, Kym, William J. Martin and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe (2006a). “Distortions to World Trade: Impacts on Agricultural Markets and Farm Incomes.” Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 28(2), pp. 168-94. Anderson, Kym, William J. Martin and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe (2006b). “Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What’s at Stake for Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3848, World Bank, Washington DC. Anderson, Kym, Marianne Kurzweil, William J. Martin, Damiano Sandri, and Ernesto Valenzuela (2008). “Methodology for Measuring Distortions to Agricultural Incentives.” Agricultural Distortions Research Project Working Paper No. 2, World Bank, Washington DC. Arndt, Channing, Henning T. Jensen, Sherman Robinson, and Finn Tarp (2000). “Marketing Margins and Agricultural Technology in Mozambique.” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 37(1), pp. 121-37. Bautista, Romeo M., Sherman Robinson, Peter Wobst, and Finn Tarp (2001). “Policy Bias and Agriculture: Partial and General Equilibrium Measures.” Review of Development Economics, Vol. 5(1), pp. 89-104. Bautista, Romeo M. and Alberto Valdés, eds. (1993). The Bias Against Agriculture. San Francisco: ICS Press. Devarajan, Shantayanan and Chalongphob Sussangkarn (1992). “Effective Rates of Protection When Domestic and Foreign Goods Are Imperfect Substitutes: The Case of Thailand.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74(4), pp. 701- 711. Jensen, Henning T. and Finn Tarp (2002). “CGE Modelling and Trade Policy: Reassessing the Agricultural Bias.” Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 53(2), pp. 383-405. Jensen, Henning T., Sherman Robinson and Finn Tarp (2002). “General Equilibrium Measures of Agricultural Bias in Fifteen Developing Countries”. IFPRI, Trade and Macroeconomics Division Discussion Paper No. 105, Washington, IFPRI. Krueger, Anne O. (1992). The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy, Volume 5. A World Bank Comparative Study. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank. Krueger, Anne O. (1998). “Why Trade Liberalization is Good for Growth.” Economic Journal, Vol. 108 (September), Issue 450, pp. 1513-1522. Krueger, Anne O., Maurice Schiff, and Alberto Valdés (1988). “Agricultural Incentives in Developing Countries: Measuring the Effect of Sectoral and Economywide Policies.” World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 2(3), pp. 255-71. Lipton, Michael (1977). Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Löfgren, Hans, Rebecca L. Harris, and Sherman Robinson (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS. Microcomputers and Policy Research 5, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Melo, Jaime de and Sherman Robinson (1981). “Trade Policy and Resource Allocation in the Presence of Product Differentiation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 63 (May), pp. 169-177. Srinivasan, T. N. and Jagdish Bhagwati (2001). ”Outward-Orientation and Development: Are the Revisionists Right?” in Trade, Development and Political Economy: Essays in Honour of Anne Krueger, Deepak Lal & Richard Shape (Eds.) Schiff, Maurice and Alberto Valdés (1992). The Political Economy of Agricultural Pricing Policy, Volume 4. A Synthesis of the Economics in Developing Countries. A World Bank Comparative Study. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61489 |