Baerg, Nicole Rae and Lowe, Will (2015): Estimating Central Bank Preferences Combining Topic and Scaling Methods.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61534.pdf Download (678kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Scholars often use Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) votes to estimate the preferences of central bankers. However, rarely do committee members on the FOMC cast dissenting votes. This article demonstrates the usefulness of using what central bankers say in FOMC meetings rather than how they vote to better measure central bank preferences. Using automated text analysis tools and scaling methods, we develop a new measure of central bank preferences on the FOMC leading up to the financial crisis (2005 - 2008).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Estimating Central Bank Preferences Combining Topic and Scaling Methods |
English Title: | Estimating Central Bank Preferences Combining Topic and Scaling Methods |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Central Banking, Federal Reserve Bank, Monetary Policy, Ideal Point Estimation, Textual Analysis |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies |
Item ID: | 61534 |
Depositing User: | Nicole Rae Baerg |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2015 14:47 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:08 |
References: | Adolph, Christopher. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality. Cambridge University Press. Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993–1022. Chang, Jonathan, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Sean Gerrish, Chong Wang and David M. Blei. 2009. “Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models.” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems pp. 288–296. Clinton, Joshua, Simon Jackman and Douglas Rivers. 2004. “The statistical analysis of roll call data.” American Political Science Review 98(02):1–16. Gerlach-Kristen, Petra and Ellen E. Meade. 2010. “Is There a Limit on FOMC Dissents? Evidence from the Greenspan Era.” (2010-16). Goodman, Leo A. 1985. “The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries.” The Annals of Statistics 13(1):10–69. Hallerberg, Mark and Joachim Wehner. 2013. “The Technical Competence of Economic Policy- Makers in Developed Democracies.” Working Paper . Havrilesky, Thomas and John Gildea. 1991. “The policy preferences of FOMC members as revealed by dissenting votes: Comment.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (1):130–138. Lowe, Will. 2013. “There’s (basically) only one way to do it.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Meeting 2013. Lowe, Will, Ken Benoit, Michael Laver and Slava Mikhaylov. 2011. “Scaling policy positions from coded units of political texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly (1):123–155. Meade, Ellen and David Stasavage. 2008. “Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the US Federal Reserve.” Economic Journal 118(528):695–717. Meade, Ellen E. 2005. “The FOMC: Preferences, Voting, and Consensus.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (2):93–101. Meade, Ellen E. and D. N. Sheets. 2005. “Regional Influences on FOMC Voting Patterns.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (4):661–677. Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2014. The politics of parliamentary debate: Parties, rebels and representation. Cambridge University Press. Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2013. Deliberating American monetary policy: a textual analysis. MIT Press. Slapin, Jonathan B. and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2008. “A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3):705–722. Taylor, John. 1993. “Discretion vs Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy pp. 195–214. 25 Thornton, Daniel L. and David C. Wheelock. 2014. “Making Sense of the Dissents: A History of FOMC Dissents.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 96(3):213–227. Wang, Xuerui, Andrew Mccallum and Xing Wei. 2007. “Topical n-grams: Phrase and topic discovery, with an application to information retrieval.” In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining . Young, Kevin and Christopher Gandrud. 2013. “How the Fed Manages its External Environment: An Analysis of Social Network and Topical Responses (1997-2012).” APSA 2013 Annual Meet- ing Paper . |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61534 |