Torero, Maximo and Viceisza, Angelino (2014): To remit, or not to remit: that is the question. A remittance field experiment. Forthcoming in: the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2015)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61786.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We conduct a remittance field experiment among Salvadoran migrants in the metro DC area. Migrants need to decide whether or not to remit funds to a recipient in El Salvador and if so how much. We maintain a (2x2) design in which the remittance budget has a value of $400 or $200, and the remitted funds arrive as cash or grocery vouchers that are non-transferable and applicable to basic necessities that do not include alcohol and cigarettes. Each migrant is randomly allocated to one of the resulting four treatments. We test across these treatments whether control over remittance spending in the form of grocery vouchers affects remittance behavior. We find the following. Our quantitative findings suggest that migrants prefer a remittance to arrive as cash than as groceries when stakes are high. This result is robust to inclusion of a wide set of covariates and is consistent with a conceptual framework in which migrants have preferences over how recipients spend remittances. Our qualitative findings suggest that migrants integrate amounts sent in the experiment with the external environment for sending remittances. We explore the mechanisms underlying the main effect and find that migrants who more recently sent a remittance and, in certain specifications, male migrants exhibit a greater preference for cash. Some implications of our findings are discussed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | To remit, or not to remit: that is the question. A remittance field experiment |
English Title: | To remit, or not to remit: that is the question. A remittance field experiment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | remittance, field experiment, remittance spending, El Salvador |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation |
Item ID: | 61786 |
Depositing User: | Dr Maximo Torero |
Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2015 14:50 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 21:26 |
References: | Agarwal, R. and A. W. Horowitz (2002). Are International Remittances Altruism or Insurance? Evidence from Guyana Using Multiple-Migrant Households. World Development 30(11), 2033–2044. Ambler, K. (2013). Don’t tell on me: Experimental evidence of asymmetric information in transnational households. Andreoni, J. and B. D. Bernheim (2009). Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects. Econometrica 77(5), 1607–1636. Andreoni, J., W. T. Harbaugh, and L. Vesterlund (2008). Altruism in Experiments (2nd edition ed.). New York, NY: North Holland. Ashraf, B. N. (2009). Spousal Control and Intra-Household Decision Making : An Experimental Study in the Philippines. The American Economic Review 99(4), 1245–1277. Ashraf, N., D. Aycinena, C. Martinez, and D. Yang (2011). Remittances and the problem of control: A field experiment among migrants from el salvador. Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes Toward Risk, Experimental Measurement in Rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(August), 395–407. Central Intelligence Agency (2010). World Factbook. Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency. Chen, J. J. (2013). Identifying non-cooperative behavior among spouses: Child outcomes in migrantsending households. Journal of Development Economics 100(1), 1 – 18. Chin, A., L. Karkoviata, and N.Wilcox (2011). Impact of bank accounts on migrant savings and remittances: Evidence from a field experiment. Croson, R. and U. Gneezy (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 1–27. de Brauw, A. (2011, February). Migration and child development during the food price crisis in el salvador. Food Policy 36(1), 28–40. de la Bri`ere, B., E. Sadoulet, A. de Janvry, and S. Lambert (2002). The roles of destination, gender, and household composition in explaining remittances: an analysis for the Dominican Sierra. Journal of Development Economics 68(2), 309–328. de Laat, J. (2008). Household Allocations and Endogenous Information. Edwards, A. C. and M. Ureta (2003). International migration, remittances, and schooling: evidence from El Salvador. Journal of Development Economics 72(2), 429–461. Faini, R. (2007). Remittances and the brain drain: Do more skilled migrants remit more? World Bank Economic Review 21(2), 177–191. Funkhouser, E. (1995). Remittances from International Migration: A Comparison of El Salvador and Nicaragua. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 137–146. Hoddinott, J. (1992). Modelling remittance flows in Kenya. Journal of African Economies 1(2), 206–232. Hoddinott, J. (1994). A Model of Migration and Remittances Applied to Western Kenya. Oxford Economic Papers 46(3), 459–476. Hoddinott, J. and L. Haddad (1995, February). Does female income share influence household expenditures? evidence from cote d’ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57(1), 77–96. International Organization for Migration (2010). Moldovan Migrants’ Health: Impact of the socio-economic welfare. Chisinau, Moldova: International Organization for Migration. Johnson, G. E. and W. E. Whitelaw (1974). Urban-Rural Income Transfers in Kenya: An Estimated- Remittances Function. Economic Development and Cultural Change 22(3), 473. Laury, S. K. (2006). Pay One or Pay All: Random Selection of One Choice for Payment. Lucas, R. E. B. and O. Stark (1985). Motivations to Remit: Evidence from Botswana. The Journal of Political Economy 93(5), 901–918. Ratha, D., S. Mohapatra, and A. Silwal (2009). Migration and Remittance Trends 2009, A better-thanexpected outcome so far, but significant risks ahead. Migration and Development Brief 11, 1–14. Strauss, J. and D. Thomas (1995). Human Resources: Empirical Modeling of Household and Family Decisions (3rd edition ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Terrazas, A. (2010). Migration Policy Institute. US in Focus-Salvadoran Immigrants in the United States. Thaler, R. H. and E. J. Johnson (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. 36(6), 643–660. The World Bank (2011). Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011. Washington, DC: TheWorld Bank. Thomas, D. (1990). Like Father, Like Son; Like Mother, Like Daughter: Parental Resources and Child Height. Journal of Human Resources 29(4), 950–988. Thomas, D. (1994). Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach. Journal of Human Resources 25(4), 635–664. Udry, C. (1996). Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104(5), pp. 1010–1046. US Census (2008). American Community Survey. Yang, D. (2006). Why Do Migrants Return to Poor Countries? Evidence from Phillipine Migrants’ Exchange Rate Shocks. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4), 715–735. Yang, D. (2008). International Migration, Remittances, and Household Investment: Evidence from Phillipine Migrants’ Exchange Rate Shocks. Economic Journal 118, 591–630. Yang, D. (2011). Migrant remittances. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3), 129–52. Yang, D. and H. Choi (2007). Are remittances insurance? Evidence from rainfall shocks in the Philippines. World Bank Economic Review 21(2), 219–248. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61786 |