Senderski, Marcin (2014): Maintenance costs of public roads: Do empirical data confirm the superiority of concrete over asphalt? Published in: Dni Betonu 2014
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63035.pdf Download (375kB) | Preview |
Abstract
One of the cornerstones of far-sighted infrastructure management is that it involves a life-cycle consideration, as endorsed notably by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration. Decisions on investments should be considered in terms of product performance over time. In spite of the initial construction cost, all constituents of maintenance (i.e. cost to be borne during road’s assumed lifespan to keep the specified service level) should be quantified to equip the public investor with full information on pavement’s long-run prospects. The major part of the existing research in this field rests on theoretical calculations which, although sound and scientifically rigid, may not always translate accurately to the actual wear and tear of pavements. Maintenance costs are also delivered to the broad public by tools like Canadian CANPav™ or Polish Kalkulator drogowy, none of which is faultless. This paper aims to apply the real life statistics on concrete versus asphalt construction costs, assembled from the commune of Grybów in southern Poland. Despite limited time series, it is still instructive to cast a closer glance at these few actual figures instead of proving concrete pavements’ long-term advantage on the basis of theoretical or anecdotal evidence. Moreover, the paper addresses the underestimated issue of local concrete roads that often gives way to more rewarding research on high-traffic-volume concrete pavements. The analysis revealed that for a 30-year horizon, given very conservative assumptions as to the discount rate, inflation rate, and the scope and frequency of pavement rehabilitation, concrete pavements are still more economical relative to bituminous pavements. For a representative road section, the net present value of future cash flows related to its maintenance was 5.67% lower in PCC concrete technology. The life-cycle saving may go up to as much as 33-35% when excessively cautious assumptions are lifted.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Maintenance costs of public roads: Do empirical data confirm the superiority of concrete over asphalt? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | concrete infrastructure; concrete roads; local roads; concrete pavements; asphalt pavements; LCCA; womb-to-tomb; cradle-to-grave |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning |
Item ID: | 63035 |
Depositing User: | Marcin Senderski |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2015 15:06 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2019 02:00 |
References: | Akbarian, M., & Ulm, F.-J. (2012). Model Based Pavement-Vehicle Interaction Simulation for Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements. Cambridge, MA. Arcata Partners. (2012). Ewolucja cen asfaltów w Polsce oraz wrażliwość firm budownictwa drogowo-mostowego na ceny materiałów. Warszawa. ASAMER. (2012). 20 years of motorway renovation. ASAMER: The Information Magazine for Employees, Customers and Partners, 4–12. Asphalt Pavement Alliance. (2011). Life-cycle cost analysis: A position paper. Lanham, MD. Bianchi, T., & Guidi, V. (2010). The Comparative Survey on the National Public Procurement Systems Across the PPN. Rome, IT. Cement Manufacturers’ Association. (2006). Cement Concrete Roads Vs Bituminous Roads - A Cost Analysis. Grameen Sampark. January-June. Cole, L. W. (n.d.). Use of Life Cycle Cost Analysis to Determine the Cost-Effectiveness of Concrete Pavement Design Features (Vol. 134). Skokie, IL. Concrete Paving Association of Minnesota. (n.d.). Concrete vs . Asphalt. White Bear Lake, MN. CTC & Associates LLC. (2011). Using Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Highway Project Development. DROCAD Sp. z o.o. (2014). Kalkulator drogowy. Retrieved from http://kalkulatordrogowy.pl/ Hall, K., Dawood, D., Vanikar, S., Tally Jr., R., Cackler, T., Correa, A., … Voigt, G. (2007). Long-Life Concrete Pavements in Europe and Canada: International Technology Scanning Program. Washington, DC. IPWEA. (2011). International Infrastructure Management Manual (4th ed.). Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia & NAMS.AU. Jackiewicz-Rek, W., & Konopska-Piechurska, M. (2013). Zrównoważony rozwój technologii nawierzchni betonowych – aspekty funkcjonalne. Budownictwo Technologie Architektura, 1(61), 36–40. Lapointe, K. (2012). Concrete vs. asphalt on roads, who wins? Daily Commercial News. Retrieved from http://dcnonl.com/article/id48193/--concrete-vs-asphalt-on-roads-who-wins Lindsey, L., Schmalensee, R., & Sacher, A. (2011). The Effects of Inflation and Its Volatility on the Choice of Construction Alternatives. Cambridge, MA. Mack, J. W. (2011). Accounting for inflation in LCCA. Skokie, IL. Milachowski, C., Stengel, T., & Gehlen, C. (2011). Life cycle assessment for road construction and use. Munich: IECA & EUPAVE. MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub. (2011). Adopting a Life-Cycle Perspective. MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub. Ochsendorf, J., Norford, L. K., Brown, D., Durschlag, H., Hsu, L. S., Love, A., … Wildnauer, M. (2011). Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Building Life Cycle. Cambridge, MA. ORGBUD-SERWIS Sp. z o.o. (2012). Analiza ruchu cen dla wybranych materiałów stosowanych w budownictwie drogowym w okresie od I kw. 2008 r. do III kw. 2012 r. Retrieved from http://www.orgbud.pl/serwis/aktual/artykul120.php Piechnik, P. (2010). Powódź, jakiej najstarsi grybowianie nie pamiętają…. Kurier Grybowski 2(45), 2–3. Poland’s Ministry of Finance. (2013). Wytyczne dotyczące założeń makroekonomicznych na potrzeby wieloletnich prognboz finansowych jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Warszawa: Ministry of Finance. Retrieved from http://www.mf.gov.pl/documents/764034/1002167/Wytyczne+jst+-+aktualizacja+listopad+2013 Ready Mixed Concrete Association of Ontario, & Cement Association of Canada. (2014). CANPav. Retrieved from http://www.canpav.com/ Sajdak-Chudzik, D. (2010, March). Drogi z betonu cementowego w powiecie nowosądeckim. Magazyn Autostrady, 18–19. Scheving, A. G. (2011). Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Asphalt and Concrete Pavements. Reykjavík University. Supreme Audit Office. (2014). NIK about local roads. Retrieved from http://www.nik.gov.pl/en/news/nik-on-local-roads.html Wilde, W. J., Waalkes, S., & Harrison, R. (1999). A life cycle cost analysis of rigid pavements. Austin, TX. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63035 |