Dietrich, Franz (2006): Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. Forthcoming in: Journal of Economic Theory
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview 
PDF
MPRA_paper_63250.pdf Download (298kB)  Preview 
Abstract
I propose a relevancebased independence axiom on how to aggregate individual yes/no judgments on given propositions into collective judgments: the collective judgment on a proposition depends only on people's judgments on propositions which are relevant to that proposition. This axiom contrasts with the classical independence axiom: the collective judgment on a proposition depends only on people's judgments on the same proposition. I generalize the premisebased rule and the sequentialpriority rule to an arbitrary priority order of the propositions, instead of a dichotomous premise/conclusion order resp. a linear priority order. I prove four impossibility theorems on relevancebased aggregation. One theorem simultaneously generalizes Arrow's Theorem (in its general and indifferencefree versions) and the wellknown Arrowlike theorem in judgment aggregation.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  judgment aggregation, relevance connections vs. logical connections between issues, generalized Arrow theorem, generalized premisebased rule, sequential priority rule, general priority rule, priority graph, aggregation of nonbinary evaluations 
Subjects:  D  Microeconomics > D7  Analysis of Collective DecisionMaking > D70  General D  Microeconomics > D7  Analysis of Collective DecisionMaking > D71  Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations 
Item ID:  63250 
Depositing User:  Franz Dietrich 
Date Deposited:  26 Mar 2015 19:32 
Last Modified:  03 Oct 2019 10:15 
References:  Balinski, M, Laraki, R (2010) Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing, MIT Press Bradley, R (2006) Taking advantage of difference in opinion, Episteme 3: 141155 Chapman, B (2002) Rational Aggregation, Polit Philos Econ 1(3): 337354 Claussen, C, Roisland, O (2010) A quantitative discursive dilemma, Social Choice and Welfare 35(1): 4964 Dietrich, F (2006a) Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems, J Econ Theory 126(1): 286298 Dietrich, F (2006b) Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others, first version, available at www.franzdietrich.net and as Meteor Research Memorandum RM/07/002, Maastricht University Dietrich, F (2007) A generalised model of judgment aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare 28: 52965 Dietrich, F (2014) Scoring rules for judgment aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare 42(4): 873911 Dietrich, F, List, C (2007a) Judgment aggregation by quota rules, Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4): 391424 Dietrich, F, List, C (2007b) Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare 29: 1933 Dietrich, F, List, C (2008) Judgment aggregation without full rationality, Social Choice and Welfare 31: 1539 Dietrich, F, List, C (2010a) Judgment aggregation on restricted domains, Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 512543 Dietrich, F, List, C (2010b) The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory, Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3: 21534 (Corrigendum on the authors' homepages) Dietrich, F, List, C (2013) Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case, Social Choice and Welfare 40: 106795 Dietrich, F, Mongin, P (2010) The premisebased approach to judgment aggregation, Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 562582 Dokow, E, Holzman, R (2010a) Aggregation of binary evaluations, Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 495511 Dokow, E, Holzman, R (2010b) Aggregation of nonbinary evaluations, Advances in Applied Mathematics 45: 487504 Dokow, E, Holzman, R (2010c) Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions, Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 544561 Duddy, C, Piggins, A (2013) Manyvalued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary, Journal of Economic Theory 148(2):793805 Duddy, C, Piggins, A, Zwicker, W (2014) Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Bordalike approach, working paper Fenstad, JF (1980) General recursion theory: an axiomatic approach, Springer Gaertner, W. (2006) A Primer in Social Choice Theory, Oxford University Press GĂ¤rdenfors, P (2006) An Arrowlike theorem for voting with logical consequences, Economics and Philosophy 22(2): 181190 Genest, C, Zidek, JV (1986) Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and Annotated Bibliography, Statistical Science 1(1): 113135 Hartmann, S, Pigozzi, G, Sprenger, J (2010) Reliable methods of judgment aggregation, Journal for Logic and Computation 20: 603617 Konieczny, S, PinoPerez, R (2002) Merging information under constraints: a logical framework, J Logic Comput 12(5): 773808 Lang, J, Pigozzi, G, Slavkovik, M, van der Torre, L (2011) Judgment aggregation rules based on minimization. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on the Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK XIII), ACM, pp. 238246 List, C (2003) A Possibility Theorem on Aggregation over Multiple Interconnected Propositions, Mathematical Social Sciences 45(1): 113 (Corrigendum in Mathematical Social Sciences 52:109110) List, C (2004) A model of pathdependence in decisions over multiple propositions, Am Polit Sci Rev 98(3): 495513 List, C (2005) Group knowledge and group rationality: a judgment aggregation perspective, Episteme 2(1): 2538 List, C, Pettit, P (2002) Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result, Economics and Philosophy 18: 89110 List, C, Pettit, P (2004) Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. Synthese 140(12): 207235 Miller, M, Osherson, D (2008) Methods for distancebased judgment aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare 32(4): 575601 Mongin, P (2005) Spurious Unanimity and the Pareto Principle, LSE Choice Group Working Papers 1 (5) Mongin, P (2008) Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation, Journal of Economic Theory 141: 100113 Nehring, K (2003) Arrow's theorem as a corollary. Econ Letters 80(3): 379382 Nehring, K (2005) The (im)possibility of a Paretian rational, working paper, Univ California at Davies Nehring, K, Pivato, M, Puppe, C (2011) Condorcet admissibility: indeterminacy and pathdependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions, working paper, University of California at Davis Nehring, K, Puppe, C (2002) Strategyproof social choice on singlepeaked domains: possibility, impossibility and the space between, working paper, Univ California at Davies Nehring, K, Puppe, C (2005) The structure of strategyproof social choice, part II: nondictatorship, anonymity and neutrality, working paper, Karlsruhe Univ Nehring, K., Puppe, C (2008) Consistent judgment aggregation: the truthfunctional Case, Social Choice and Welfare 31: 4157 Pauly, M, van Hees, M (2006) Logical constraints on judgment aggregation, J Philos Logic 35: 569585 Pigozzi, G (2006) Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argumentbased account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation, Synthese 152(2): 285298 Pivato, M (2009) The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare, 33: 55974 Rubinstein, A, Fishburn, P (1986) Algebraic aggregation theory, J Econ Theory 38: 6377 Wilson, R (1975) On the Theory of Aggregation, J Econ Theory 10: 8999 Zwicker, W (2011) Towards a Borda count for judgment aggregation, extended abstract, Conference `Judgment Aggregation and Voting', Karlsruhe Institute of Technology 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/63250 
Available Versions of this Item

Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. (deposited 25 Sep 2014 17:09)
 Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. (deposited 26 Mar 2015 19:32) [Currently Displayed]