Local Tax Limits, Student Achievement, and School-Finance Equalization

Davis, Matt and Vedder, Andrea and Stone, Joe (2015): Local Tax Limits, Student Achievement, and School-Finance Equalization.

Abstract

Evidence that local tax and expenditure limits (TELs) for public K-12 schools lower student achievement is widely attributed to the effects of reduced funding, but our results cast doubt on reduced funding as the primary explanation for negative effects of TELs in the context of school-finance equalization (SFE) and instead suggest the importance of predictable funding. Students in districts subject to more severe local tax limits in Oregon score less well on eighth-grade tests in mathematics, but reduced funding is not the reason. Our analysis expands prior work by accounting for the extent to which TELs are actually binding, as well as for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary effects of TELs. Distinguishing pecuniary and non-pecuniary effects allows us to document that the negative effect of TELs in Oregon is not due to reduced expenditures. The state’s school-finance equalization (SFE) tends to offset funding differentials, so TELs have no significant effect on funding, but even if TELs did affect funding, the negative effect of TELs on achievement is significant even if district expenditures are held constant. Instead, the negative effect of more restrictive TELs appears to work by disrupting local planning. We isolate this effect by distinguishing the more uncertain first year of each biennial budget from the second year. Our quasi-experimental design accounts for district and year fixed effects, as well as for district-specific variations in expenditures and student attributes. Results are robust to a placebo test to reveal spurious correlation and to several alternative specifications.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: taxes expenditures, limitations, students,achievement, school finance equalization
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H0 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General

References

Bettinger, E. and E. Williams .2013. ‘Federal and State Financial Aid during the Great Recession’ NBER working paper

Archibald, R. B. and David H. Feldman. 2006. ‘Higher Education Spending and the Tax Revolt.’ Journal of Higher Education 77.4: 618-44.

Bania N, Gray J A. And J. A. Stone 2007. ‘Growth, Taxes, and Government Expenditures: Growth Hills for U.S. states.’ National Tax Journal 60(2): 193-204.

Ehrenberg, R. G. 2006. What’s happening to American Public Higher Education? The Shifting Financial Burden. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, MD.

Farrell, P. L. and G. S. Kienzl. 2009. ‘Are State Non-Need, Merit-Based Scholarship Programs Impacting College Enrollment?’ Education Finance and Policy, 4:2, 150-74

Fisher, R. C. 1982. ‘Income and grant effects on local expenditure: The flypaper effect and other difficulties,’ Journal of Urban Economics 12:3, 324-45.

Hahn, J., Hausman, J., and G. Kuersteiner. 2007. Long difference estimation for dynamic panel models with fixed effects.’ Journal of Econometrics, 140:2, 574-617.

Hurley, D. J. and others. 2014. ‘A Proposed Federal Program to Stop Privatization of Public Higher Education. Policy Matters, January, 1-17.

Humphries, B. 2000. ‘Do Business Cycles Affect State Appropriations to Higher Education?’Southern Economic Journal 67:2 397-418.

Kane, T. J., Orszag, P. R. and D. L. Gunter. 2003. State Fiscal Constraints and Higher Education Spending: the role of Medicaid and the business cycle. Brookings.

Mehiriz.K. and R. Marceau. 2014. ‘The Flypaper Effects of Intergovernmental grants to Quebec Municipalities,’ Public Budgeting and Finance. 34:1, 85-102.

Mofidi, A. and J. A. Stone. 1990. “Do State and Local Taxes Affect Economic Growth?” The Review of Economics and Statistics 72:4, 686-691.

Quinn, G. P. and M. J. Keough. 2001. Design and Analysis for Biologists, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.

Reed, R. 2008. ‘The Robust Relationship between Taxes and U. S. State Income Growth.’ National Tax Journal 61:5-80.

Rizzo, M. J. 2004. ‘A (Less Than) Zero-Sum Game? State Funding for Public Education: How Public Higher Education Institutions Have Lost.’ Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell U. Singell, L. D., Jr., Waddell, G. R., and Brad R. Curs. 2006. ‘Hope for the Pell? The Impact of Merit Aid on Needy Students’. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 79-99.

Singell. L. D., Jr. and J A. Stone. 2002. ‘The Good, the Poor, and the Wealthy: Who Responds More to College Financial Aid.’ Bulletin of Economic Research 54:2, pp. 393-407.

Singell, Larry D, Waddell, G. R. and B. Curs. 2007. ‘Money for Nothing? The Impact of Changes in the Pell-grant rogram on Institutional Revenues and the Placement of Needy Students.’ Education Finance and Policy 2:3, 228-261.

Stone, J. A. 2012. ‘State Funding for Higher education: Explaining the Great Retreat.’ MPRA working paper 39732.

Tucker, Harvey J. 1982. ‘It’s About Time: The Use of Time-Series Analysis in Cross Sectional Political Research.’ American Journal of Political Science 26:1, 167-196.

Turner, L. 2012. ‘The Incidence of Student Financial Aid: Evidence from the Pell Program.’ Ph.D. dissertation Columbia U. S. Department of Education. 2011-12 Federal Student Aid Handbook, 3:2-3.

Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press