Kuhlmann, Stefan and Boekholt, Patries and Georghiou, Luke and Guy, Ken and Heraud, Jean-Alain and Laredo, Philippe and Lemola, Tarmo and Loveridge, Denis and Luukkonen, Terttu and Moniz, António and Polt, Wolfgang and Rip, Arie and Sanz-Menendez, Luis and Smits, Ruud (1999): Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Published in: ASTPP Thematic Network, TSER No. Final Report (June 1999): pp. 1-87.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_6426.pdf Download (395kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Science and technology (S&T) are considered to be a central source, or at least a basic medium, of societal and industrial innovation, while innovation is conceived to basically feed the regeneration of our welfare. The suppliers of S&T in Europe as well as the users of their „products“, are confronted with a number of challenges today. We want to stress here that it was not the primary goal of our Advanced Science & Technology Policy Planning (ASTPP) Network to come up with proposals how the strategic character of European S&T policies could be strengthened. The ASTPP-network instead focuses on one aspect: the provision of strategic intelligence necessary to identify and develop strategic choices. The underlying hypothesis is that the existing body of experiences with technology foresight, technology assessment and S/T policy evaluation provides a basis for the development of an advanced S&T policy „planning“ approach by trying to enhance, interlink or even integrate the growing, but still dispersed experience in these three areas of intelligence. By „intelligent“ we mean that the inter-relatedness of S&T, industrial efforts, societal needs and political interventions becomes more transparent so that interactive collaboration between them will be facilitated.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | innovation; Technology Policy; technology foresight; assessment; evaluation |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination |
Item ID: | 6426 |
Depositing User: | António Moniz |
Date Deposited: | 24 Dec 2007 00:14 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 04:56 |
References: | Callon, M.; Laredo, P.; Mustar, P. (1997): The strategic management of research and technology, Paris, Economica International. Den Hertog, P.; Bilderbeek, R.; Maltha, S. (1997): "Intangibles. The soft side of innovation", Futures, 29 (1), pp. 33- 45. Edqvist, Ch. (ed.) (1997): Systems of Innovation. Technology, institutions and organisations, London/Washington, Pinter. Freeman, C. (1987): Technology policy and economic performance: Lesson from Japan, London, Pinter. Gibbons, M. et al. (1994): The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in comtemporary societies, London, Sage Publ. Georghiou, L. (1995): "Research evaluation in European Nation Science and Technology Systems", Research evaluation, vol. 5 (1), pp. 3 - 10. Georghiou, L. (1998): "The UK TF programme", Futures, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 359-377. Grupp, H. (ed.) (1992); Dynamics of science-based innovation, Berlin, Springer. Kodama, F. (1995): Emerging patterns of innovation. Sources of Japan's technology edge, Boston, Harvard Business School Press. Kuhlmann, S. (1998): "Moderation of policy-making? Science and technology policy evaluationbeyond impact management. The case of Germany", Evaluation, Vol. 4 (2), pp. 130 - 148. Lundvall, B-A. (1992): National Systems of Innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, London, Pinter. Lundvall, B-A.; Borrás, S. (1998): The globalising learning economy. Implications for innovation policy, Luxemburg, European Commission. Martin, Ben: Foresight in Science and Technology. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management vol. 7 (1995), no. 2. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993): National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press. OECD (1997): Policy evaluation in innovation and technology, Paris, OECD. Porter, M. E. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations, London, Macmillan. Rip, A.; van den Meulen, B. (1997): The post-modern research system, in Barré, R. et al (eds): Science in tomorrow's Europe, Paris, Economica International, pp. 51-67. Smits, Ruud: The problematic but promising relationship between technology assessment, foresight and evaluation, in: Reader of the 3rd ASTPP workshop, Amsterdam 1996 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/6426 |