Kui-Wai, Li and Bharat R., Hazari (2015): The Possible Tragedy of Quantitative Easing: An IS-LM Approach. Published in: E-axes No. On Monetary Policy and Central Banking (1 May 2015)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64652.pdf Download (74kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The object of this paper is to demonstrate the possible risks of quantitative easing in the long run. The analysis is conducted in the conventional framework of IS-LM curves in a sequential model, which assumes that the independence of supply and demand curves does not necessarily hold. It is established that this lack of independence coupled with a very flat (or kinked) IS curve may lead to falls in income in second period as a consequence of quantitative easing. Such easing may alter the behavior of investors who get encouraged to undertake very risky and leveraged investments. Thus, short term gains may be outweighed by long term losses from quantitative easing. In some cases such easing may create bubbles in the economy, for example, in the housing and stock markets which collapse at some point in time.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Possible Tragedy of Quantitative Easing: An IS-LM Approach |
English Title: | The Possible Tragedy of Quantitative Easing: An IS-LM Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Interest rate, quantitative easing, IS-LM framework, non-independence of supply and demand curves |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy |
Item ID: | 64652 |
Depositing User: | Dr Kui-Wai Li |
Date Deposited: | 29 May 2015 04:13 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:39 |
References: | Castelnuovo, E., 2012, “Estimating the evolution of money’s role in the U.S. monetary business cycle”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44, 1, February, 23-52. Coibion, O., 2012, “Are the effects of monetary shocks big or small?”. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4, 2, 1-32. Friedman, Milton, 1968, “The role of monetary policy”. American Economic Review, 58, March, 1-17. Fuchs, Victor R., 1978, The Supply of Surgeons and the Demand for Operations, Working Paper No. 236, Center for Economic Analysis of Human Behavior and Social Institutions, Stanford: National Bureau of Economic Research, March. Fujiki, H., Okina, K., and Shiratsuka, S., 2001, “Monetary policy under zero interest rate: Viewpoints of central bank economists”. Monetary and Economic Studies, February, 89-130. Gambacortia, Leonardo, Hofmann, B. and Peersman, G., 2014, “The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross-country analysis”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46, 4, June, 615-642. Gomis-Porqueras, P., and Sanches, D., 2013, “Optimal monetary policy in a model of money and credit”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45, 4, June, 701-730. Hamilton, James D., and Wu, J. C., 2012, “The effectiveness of alternative monetary policy tools in a zero lower bound environment”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44, 1, February, 3-46. Judd, John P. and Rudebusch, Glenn D., 1998, “Taylor’s rule and the Fed: 1970–1997”. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 3, 3–16. Kimura, T., and Small, D., 2004, Quantitative Monetary Easing and Risk and Financial Asset Market, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board, Washington D. C., September. Li, K.-W., 2013, “The U.S. monetary performance prior to the 2008 crisis”. Applied Economics, 45, 24, August, 3449-3460. Li, K.-W., 2014, “Could there be a "Sub-market Interest Rate" in the IS-LM Framework?”, E-axes, Research Paper on Monetary Policy and Banking, New York, May. Mehra, Yash P. and Minton, Brian D., 2007, “A Taylor rule and the Greenspan era”. Economic Quarterly, 93 (3), 229-250. Mendoza, E. G., and Vincenzo, Q., 2010, “Financial globalization, financial crisis and contagion”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57, 24-39. Mumtaz, H., and Zanetti, F., 2012, “The impact of volatility of monetary policy shocks”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45, 4, June, 535-558. Schwartz, A. J., 2009, “Origins of the financial market crisis of 2008”. Cato Journal, 29, 1, 19-23. Schmidt, S., 2013, “Optimal monetary and fiscal policy with a zero bound on nominal interest rates”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45, 7, October, 1335-1350. Shirakawa, M. (2002). One Year Under “Quantitative Easing”, IMES Discussion Paper No.2002-E-3, Bank of Japan, Tokyo. Soros, George, 1995, Soros on Soros: Staying Ahead of the Curve. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Sraffa, Piero, 1926, “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions”, Economic Journal,36, 44, December, 535-550. Sraffa, Piero, 1960, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, J. B., 2012, First Principles: Five Keys to Restoring America’s Prosperity. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Thornton, D. L., 2010, “Would QE2 have a significant effect on economic growth, employment, or inflation?”. Economic Synopses, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 29, 1-2. Wright, J., 2011, What does Monetary Policy Do to Long-term Interest Rate at Zero Lower Bound?, John Hopkins University Working Paper. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64652 |