Zou, Tieding (2014): 养老金亏空、延迟退休与改革阻力—— 基于投票理论视角.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65147.pdf Download (351kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article employed a voting model to describe the optimum strategy for later retirement. The results indicated that, later retirement just a emergency measure to pension shortfall. The preference to later retirement was related with the gap between actual age and legal retirement age. The pensioner who has retired would support, and the worker who’s age was near to legal retirement age would against, but the worker who’s age was far away to legal retirement age was uncertainty. Generally speaking, high skilled labor was more like to later retirement than low skilled labor. But actually, the preference to later retirement not only related with the burdens and benefits of pension reform, but also related with the feeling of burden, and the growth speed of wage , social position and job satisfaction. The resistance to reform was mainly comes from the pensioners who near to legal retirement age that still working and the low skilled labor wich far away from legal retirement age. Government should concentrate on giving a successfully persuasion to the opponents, and the input of human capital also should be raised.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | 养老金亏空、延迟退休与改革阻力—— 基于投票理论视角 |
English Title: | Pension Shortfall, Later Retirement and Resistance to Reform —— Based on the Perspective of Voting Theory |
Language: | Chinese |
Keywords: | Pension; Pension Shortfall; Pension Reform; Later Retirement; Voting Theory |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus |
Item ID: | 65147 |
Depositing User: | Tieding zou |
Date Deposited: | 01 Jul 2015 14:44 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 07:25 |
References: | 蔡昉,2010:《人口转变、人口红利与刘易斯转折点》,《经济研究》第4期,第4-13页。 程永宏,2005:《现收现付制与人口老龄化关系定量分析》,《经济研究》第3期,第57-68页。 丁一、吕学静,2013:《提高退休年龄与开发高技能老年人才资源:作用机制及制度设计》,《经济学家》第10期,第29-39页。 郭庆旺、贾俊雪、赵志耘,2007:《中国传统文化信念、人力资本积累与家庭养老保障机制》,《经济研究》第8期,第58-72页。 雷晓燕、谭力、赵耀辉,2010:《退休会影响健康吗?》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1539-1558页。 林忠晶、龚六堂,2007:《退休年龄、教育年限与社会保障》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第211-230页。 林宝,2010:《人口老龄化对企业职工基本养老保险制度的影响》,《中国人口科学》第1期,第84-112页。 刘欣、朱妍,2011:《中国城市的社会阶层与基层人大选举》,《社会学研究》第6期,第34-58页。 刘万,2013:《延迟退休一定有损退休利益吗?——基于对城镇职工不同退休年龄养老金财富的考察》,《经济评论》第4期,第27-36页。 彭浩然、陈斌开,2012:《鱼和熊掌能否兼得:养老金危机的代际冲突研究》,《世界经济》第2期,第84-97页。 王亚柯、王宾韩、冰洁等,2013:《我国养老保障水平差异研究——基于替代率与相对水平的比较分析》,《管理世界》第8期,第109-117页。 王宇熹、汪泓、肖峻,2010:《养老保险体系可持续发展路径分析与政策选择——以上海为例》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第2期,第45-53页。 孙玄,2005:《关于退休年龄的思考》,《人口与经济》第3期,第67-71页。 徐晓华,2012:《中国基本养老保险金缺口的宏观控制》,《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》第5期,第105-112页。 姚远,2012:《退休年龄调整:为何如此纠结?》,《人口研究》第6期,第27-45页。 原新,2006:《缓解老龄化压力, 推迟退休有效吗?》,《人口研究》第4期,第47-54页。 邹铁钉、叶航,2014:《养老保险体制改革》,《统计研究》第2期,第24-34页。 邹铁钉、叶航,2014:《形式公平与运行效率的替代效应——基于实质公平的养老改革》,《经济研究》第3期,第115-129页。 曾燕、郭延峰、张玲,2013:《基于长寿风险与OLG 模型的延迟退休决策》,《金融经济学研究》第4期,第83-93页。 曾益、任超然、汤学良 ,2013:《延长退休年龄能降低个人账户养老金的财政补助吗?》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第12期,第81-96页。 Arrow, K. J. , 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, New York. Becker, G. S. , 1976, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, The University of Chicago Press. Blöndal, S. and Scarpetta, S. , 1997, "Early Retirement in OECD Countries: The Role of Social Security Systems", OECD Economic Studies, 29(2): 7-54. Browning, E. K. , 1975, "Why the social insurance budget is too large in a democracy", Economic inquiry, 13(3): 373-388. Casamatta, G. , Cremer, H and Pestieau, P. , 2005, "Voting on Pensions with Endogenous Retirement Age", Internatinal Tax and Public Finance, 12(1): 7-28. Forteza, A. , 2002, "Electoral competition and the unfunding of public pension programs", Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, Working Paper 11200. Lacomba, J. A and Lagos. F. M. , 2007, "Political election on legal retirement age", Social Choice Welfare , 29(1):1–17. Marquardt, M and Peters, W. , 1997, Collective Madness: How Ageing Influences Majority Voting on Public Pensions, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Press. Olson, M. , 1965, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press. Sen, A. K. , 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, University of Michigan Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65147 |